<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maersk Staying In SC Through 2014</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/10/22/maersk-staying-in-sc-through-2014/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/10/22/maersk-staying-in-sc-through-2014/</link>
	<description>Politics, Sports and Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:07:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/10/22/maersk-staying-in-sc-through-2014/#comment-72918</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=31779#comment-72918</guid>
		<description>It is always about the money. A few years back , Maersk was 50% of Charleston&#039;s container business. How much did the SPA reduce its rate to get Maersk to keep some of their business at Charleston? 

Ideally, with a truly transparent state government, taxpayers should know the economics of a business venture they own. Especially since we are constructing another terminal, with no guarantee of any business, while struggling to maintain the volume handled way back in 1998.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is always about the money. A few years back , Maersk was 50% of Charleston&#8217;s container business. How much did the SPA reduce its rate to get Maersk to keep some of their business at Charleston? </p>
<p>Ideally, with a truly transparent state government, taxpayers should know the economics of a business venture they own. Especially since we are constructing another terminal, with no guarantee of any business, while struggling to maintain the volume handled way back in 1998.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jed</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/10/22/maersk-staying-in-sc-through-2014/#comment-72878</link>
		<dc:creator>Jed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 01:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=31779#comment-72878</guid>
		<description>Wonder if we&#039;ll ever see the details of the deal. Clearly Maersk got some serious concessions here, but even without the absurdly overstated economic impact that the SPA claims, it still means a lot of jobs that won&#039;t be leaving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonder if we&#8217;ll ever see the details of the deal. Clearly Maersk got some serious concessions here, but even without the absurdly overstated economic impact that the SPA claims, it still means a lot of jobs that won&#8217;t be leaving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newzjunkie</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/10/22/maersk-staying-in-sc-through-2014/#comment-72875</link>
		<dc:creator>newzjunkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=31779#comment-72875</guid>
		<description>The issue all along was Bernie and his arrogance! Now that HE is gone - problem resolved. It was never about the Unions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The issue all along was Bernie and his arrogance! Now that HE is gone &#8211; problem resolved. It was never about the Unions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

