<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: America Is &#8220;Miss Independent&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/10/22/america-is-miss-independent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/10/22/america-is-miss-independent/</link>
	<description>Politics, Sports and Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:28:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/10/22/america-is-miss-independent/#comment-72989</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 06:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=31768#comment-72989</guid>
		<description>Great picture of Miss Independent. Love Kelly Clarkson! 
There is no perfect party, but I will stick with the Democrats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great picture of Miss Independent. Love Kelly Clarkson!<br />
There is no perfect party, but I will stick with the Democrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/10/22/america-is-miss-independent/#comment-72946</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=31768#comment-72946</guid>
		<description>There is a way to get them both back on the straight and narrow.
Repeat after me...
TERM LIMITS...TERM LIMITS...TERM LIMITS...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a way to get them both back on the straight and narrow.<br />
Repeat after me&#8230;<br />
TERM LIMITS&#8230;TERM LIMITS&#8230;TERM LIMITS&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/10/22/america-is-miss-independent/#comment-72892</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 08:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=31768#comment-72892</guid>
		<description>Easy, but true.  Both parties suck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Easy, but true.  Both parties suck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronbo</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/10/22/america-is-miss-independent/#comment-72873</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=31768#comment-72873</guid>
		<description>The fact that so many voters don&#039;t identify with a party tells you they want to identify with a party that&#039;s, conveniently, matching up to your POV? Okay, that&#039;s a nice little fantasy.  
Maybe many of these voters are apolitical, or for other reasons aren&#039;t going to identify with a party.  Any party.  Maybe their views are not homogeneous and they are actually quite diverse, so your neat little &quot;fiscally conservative, socially libertarian&quot; construct won&#039;t fit (you think the greens will fit that? just to pick one group). 
WaPo published a lengthy analysis of independent voters back in 2007, and they don&#039;t all just happen to fit your conservative-libertarian label.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/30/AR2007063000859.html
Money quote: 
&quot;The survey data established five categories of independents: closet partisans on the left and right; ticket-splitters in the middle; those disillusioned with the system but still active politically; ideological straddlers whose positions on issues draw from both left and right; and a final group whose members are mostly disengaged from politics.&quot;

Doesn&#039;t sound like a ready-made market for your Goldwater Republican-lite vision to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that so many voters don&#8217;t identify with a party tells you they want to identify with a party that&#8217;s, conveniently, matching up to your POV? Okay, that&#8217;s a nice little fantasy.<br />
Maybe many of these voters are apolitical, or for other reasons aren&#8217;t going to identify with a party.  Any party.  Maybe their views are not homogeneous and they are actually quite diverse, so your neat little &#8220;fiscally conservative, socially libertarian&#8221; construct won&#8217;t fit (you think the greens will fit that? just to pick one group).<br />
WaPo published a lengthy analysis of independent voters back in 2007, and they don&#8217;t all just happen to fit your conservative-libertarian label.<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/30/AR2007063000859.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/30/AR2007063000859.html</a><br />
Money quote:<br />
&#8220;The survey data established five categories of independents: closet partisans on the left and right; ticket-splitters in the middle; those disillusioned with the system but still active politically; ideological straddlers whose positions on issues draw from both left and right; and a final group whose members are mostly disengaged from politics.&#8221;</p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t sound like a ready-made market for your Goldwater Republican-lite vision to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morons</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/10/22/america-is-miss-independent/#comment-72858</link>
		<dc:creator>Morons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=31768#comment-72858</guid>
		<description>This was Kelly Clarkson before the cheeseburgers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was Kelly Clarkson before the cheeseburgers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

