<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Legislative Audit Council Responds, Leventis Still Silent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/10/21/legislative-audit-council-responds-leventis-still-silent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/10/21/legislative-audit-council-responds-leventis-still-silent/</link>
	<description>Politics, Sports and Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:24:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silence Dogood</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/10/21/legislative-audit-council-responds-leventis-still-silent/#comment-73036</link>
		<dc:creator>Silence Dogood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 02:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=31695#comment-73036</guid>
		<description>I have been following these stories as you have put them out there, but there continues to be some disconect logically speaking.  Apparently the audit wasn&#039;t that bad...so if Leventis was sneaking stuff into the report to settle a political score, he must be one hell of an idiot if the LAC report was not that damning.

Secondly, if Leventis leaked the report information to WIS, why weren&#039;t the terrible things he thought were going to be in the report actually in it??? Or was he just speculating on the report instead of leaking anything - spectulation is still against the law in this state (not yet anyway).  This is really a nothing-burger of a story, yet you keep pushing it for some reason.  Whatever that reason is, well...now that might be interesting, but I bet that isn&#039;t very interesting either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been following these stories as you have put them out there, but there continues to be some disconect logically speaking.  Apparently the audit wasn&#8217;t that bad&#8230;so if Leventis was sneaking stuff into the report to settle a political score, he must be one hell of an idiot if the LAC report was not that damning.</p>
<p>Secondly, if Leventis leaked the report information to WIS, why weren&#8217;t the terrible things he thought were going to be in the report actually in it??? Or was he just speculating on the report instead of leaking anything &#8211; spectulation is still against the law in this state (not yet anyway).  This is really a nothing-burger of a story, yet you keep pushing it for some reason.  Whatever that reason is, well&#8230;now that might be interesting, but I bet that isn&#8217;t very interesting either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ynot</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/10/21/legislative-audit-council-responds-leventis-still-silent/#comment-72764</link>
		<dc:creator>Ynot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=31695#comment-72764</guid>
		<description>Leventis is busy Sic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leventis is busy Sic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

