A “True American?”

By fitsnews • on October 8, 2009
Comment Print

statue of liberty

Sometimes it’s tough to tell who plays for America and who plays for … well, the other guys.

Take Mark Lloyd – the Federal Communications Commission “diversity czar” who has expressed starstruck support for Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez, and yet utter contempt for the U.S. First Amendment.

Amazingly, Lloyd received a ringing endorsement this week from recently-appointed FCC Commissioner Mignon Clyburn.  Take a look at Clyburn sticking up for Lloyd  in this exclusive interview granted to Ashley Hester of FITS News …

As you can see in the video above, Clyburn was asked point blank if Lloyd’s support of the Chavez regime and his efforts to regulate media content here in America were “in keeping with the mission of the FCC or any other U.S. government agency for that matter.”

“I will say to you that I did not read whatever his alleged statement is,” Clyburn said in a somewhat rambling response, later hinting that Lloyd may have said some things “that might have been misinterpreted.”

“I know him to be a true American,” Clyburn said later in the interview. “I know him to be a lover of this country. I know him to be a committed employee. That’s the Mark Lloyd I know.”

Clearly, Clyburn doesn’t know Lloyd very well at all.

While Lloyd’s love of America is dubious at best, his love of the Chavez regime in Venezuela is boundless.

“In Venezuela, with Chavez, (it) is really an incredible revolution – a democratic revolution – to begin to put in place things that are going to have an impact on the people of Venezuela,” Lloyd said at a 2008 media conference.  “The property owners and the folks who then controlled the media in Venezuela rebelled – worked, frankly, with folks here in the U.S. government – worked to oust (Chavez). But he came back with another revolution, and then Chavez began to take very seriously the media in his country.”

Indeed he did begin to “take very seriously” the media, actually shutting down a network that disagreed with him.  Of course that was just one component of what Lloyd calls a “democratic” revolution that also saw the government seize private property and nationalize Venezuelan industry.

But it’s not just Lloyd’s support of Chavez that’s so disturbing – it is his radical views on the Fourth Estate here in America.

“My focus here is not freedom of speech or the press,” Lloyd writes in his 2006 book, Prologue to a Farce. “This freedom is all too often an exaggeration. At the very least, blind references to freedom of speech or the press serve as a distraction from the critical examination of other communications policies.”

Uh, no.  Freedom of speech and of the press is the only communications policy that matters.  Or at least that’s the way it should be.

Not to Lloyd, though.

“[T]he purpose of free speech is warped to protect global corporations and block rules that would promote democratic governance,” Lloyd writes later in his book.

Huh?  Say what?

The last time we checked, the purpose of free speech was to protect the democratic process from people who would seek to undermine it … people like Lloyd, quite frankly.

It gets worse, though.  According to Lloyd, the best way to deal with media outlets that don’t subscribe to the government’s views is to threaten them, harass them, sue them and … if necessary … take away their licenses.  He also supports forcing commercial owners who don’t tow the government line to pay fines and fee to support government broadcasting, basically replacing “dissenting” voices with government-sanctioned content.

Amazing, isn’t it?

And this guy works for the American government … your government … in a position that was created especially for him by the administration of  President Barack Obama.

But according to Mignon Clyburn, whose job it is to regulate the marketplace of ideas in this country, we shouldn’t worry because Lloyd is a “true American” who “loves his country.”

If that’s true, people, then this country is in serious, serious trouble …

fitsfinger

Comments

By Calhoun Fawls on October 8th, 2009 at 7:19 am

What is this lady on. Those eyes look spaced out.

By Philip Branton on October 8th, 2009 at 7:47 am

Obviously…Calhoun Falls

She has no clue that we are ALL being BURPED on METHANE SCAMMING across our entire state….!!!

Mrs. Mignon would be LIVID with her Father is she KNEW about this technology…
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8290130.stm

…and realized that ALL landfills could be closed down but the Good ol’ Boys are raping everyone’s tax wallet. Our state newspapers are just playing along to not ROCK the BOAT of both parties….!!!!

Mike ROSE is really getting one over on MRS. Mignon to pocket the Tire Kingdom campaign stash in Berkeley County…!!! So much for the JAFRA Ports Inland Port bonanza…!!!

By beentook2 on October 8th, 2009 at 8:30 am

To Calhoun. That is the result of bright lights hitting the face of a cockroach. As for Lloyd he is a “true” cockroach. He enjoys being a cockroach and he will forever be a cockroach. I reckon I now need to prepare to be threatened, harassed and sued by this cockroach.

By LikeaBoss on October 8th, 2009 at 10:22 am

Behold the down side of nepotism.

By Eric on October 8th, 2009 at 11:57 am

Venezuela is a horribly run country and it should be a model for what NOT to do. One can literally have their house stolen from them by the government and they will only give pennies on the dollar for what it is worth. Supporting Chavez in any way is totally incomprehensible.

By Joseph Reynolds on October 8th, 2009 at 12:34 pm

Can you PLEASE ban phillip branton??

By fitsnews on October 8th, 2009 at 12:38 pm

Joseph,

Ban a commenter? That’s a little FCC-ish, don’t you think?

As curious as some of Mr. Branton’s musings may be, he has the same right to try and gain acceptance for his thoughts in the marketplace of ideas as anyone else.

-FITS

By Laura Campbell on October 8th, 2009 at 8:25 pm

Could you at least fire Mande’s ass, per her article “Swayze & Polanski:The Parallels”, or ban, yes ban, her from writing articles on serious issues like child sex abuse?

Everyone, check it out. An article basically stating that Patrick Swayze’s character in the movie “Dirty Dancing” should be considered a child sex offender if people are going to demand Polanski come back to America & serve prison time.

I know it sounds unbelievable, but before you call me crazy, read it. Read the responses to the article.

I support that Sic and FITS are trying to address serious political problems. I understand the need for anonymous sources. I understand fighting fire with fire. However, that article should never have appeared anywhere, if for no other reason than the blatant ridiculousness of it, or, by posting it, to simply let people know some sick individuals have this point of view. If it weren’t about such a serious issue, it would warrant no response.

FITS, I noticed you don’t have that article or the SC “Another Day, Another Scandal” article on the homepage SC Politics. Apparently, you’re at least decent enough not to remove Mande’s article entirely.

However, address the issue & deal with the fact that other blogs & some MSM will probably rake you over the coals on this one. Not to mention that anyone “reporting” or simply discussing anything should never say, “I just don’t feel like getting into the ins and outs of it, so I’m dodging your question,” or “I never let facts get in the way of my opinion,” and there’s more.

Again, what must victims of child sex abuse think about people like Mande posting such an article?

By Interloper on October 8th, 2009 at 11:04 pm

Seems to me that you have a problem with black people having minds of their own. Both Clyburn and Lloyd are just as entitled to have and express their opinions as you are. There’s no color test for that.

By Toyota Kawaski on October 9th, 2009 at 8:26 am

Interloper did you really put Clyburn et al and minds in the same sentence?

Leave a Comment