Instigator Of Prisons “Witch Hunt” Under Fire
The instigator of a “witch hunt” against the S.C. Department of Corrections is now coming under intense fire himself for failing to disclose the politically-incorrect motives behind his recent all-out assault on the state agency and its director, Jon Ozmint.
S.C. Senator Phil Leventis (D-Sumter) is also facing a SLED investigation for improperly obtaining – and then publishing – information from an unreleased Legislative Audit Council (LAC) report in an effort to pursue his vendetta.
Ozmint declined to speak to FITS about the particulars of the case, referring us to public documents and citing a desire to wait until the controversial audit report was published.
According to documents and sources who spoke with FITS, however, the back story on this investigation will blow your doors off.
The three-year saga between the Senator and the Corrections director apparently began in late 2006, when Leventis was approached by two nurses at the Department of Corrections to complain about racial discrimination and other wrongdoings allegedly committed by their supervisor and one of her assistants.
Specifically, the two employees “repeatedly used the N-word” in reference to African-American inmates and, in at least one case, co-workers.
Upon learning of these accusations, Leventis replied that the supervisor in question was one of his neighbors as well as a worker on his political campaigns. And so rather than reporting the accusations to the Department or to SLED, he allegedly informed his longtime friend of the nature of the charges – and provided the identities of the two individuals who were making the complaints.
Eventually, the accusations were reported to the Department of Corrections – which began an internal investigation in April of 2007.
“The investigation took several months and revealed violations including racial discrimination and creation of a hostile work environment,” according to a confidential Department memo obtained by FITS.
Dozens of current and former Corrections employees were interviewed during the course of the investigation, which reached several harrowing conclusions.
“The documents proved misconduct and, across racial lines, virtually all of the witnesses corroborated the complaints of discrimination,” the memo reveals. “They stated that this supervisor used racial slurs and epithets, that she belittled and harassed African-American medical staff, and that she refused to treat black officers who were injured or ill.”
Based on this investigation, both Sen. Leventis’ neighbor/ campaign worker and her subordinate were fired, but not before Leventis began a pattern of threatening behavior that has continued to this day.
After first learning of the accusations, Leventis is alleged to have placed a threatening call to his friend’s immediate supervisor at Corrections, threatening prosecution if his friend were fired. That threat has been documented by a sworn affidavit.
After the firing, however, is when Leventis stepped up his attack.
With permission from powerful Republican Sen. Hugh Leatherman and the support of S.C. Sen. Mike Fair – who chairs the Senate Penology Committee – Leventis started a jihad against the Department that included hearings based on “allegations” provided exclusively by the two fired employees.
On top of that, he testified on behalf of the two fired employees before the state’s grievance panel and changed his Senate Finance subcommittee assignment in an effort to draft budget provisos that would adversely impact Corrections, historically one of the state’s most woefully-underfunded agencies.
Leatherman, Fair and several other Senators also joined Leventis in requesting an audit of Corrections – which is where Leventis’ jihad may have finally crossed the line from political “witch hunt” and entered the realm of illegality.
Specifically, Leventis is alleged to have had a hand in the drafting of some of the tools used by the audit, as well as guiding the direction of the report and receiving updates on its findings. Leventis also appears to have been provided with a copy of the final report, which as of Wednesday has yet to be publicly released.
In fact, in a September 14, 2009 interview with WIS TV 10 in Columbia, Leventis basically discloses the content of the report, even prefacing his remarks by saying that “in the (audit) report it’s going to note …”
Each of the alleged instances of Leventis’ meddling – as well as the improper release of audit information – are expressly prohibited by state law.
Sources familiar with the content of the audit say that there are a few “minor issues” but that the report essentially gives Corrections “a clean bill of health.”
So … did Leventis’ personal vendetta lead to an attempt to influence the LAC report improperly, perhaps even illegally? And did he receive a copy of its findings in advance – and then publicize those findings in violation of state law?
A source at SLED told FITS that the agency is investigating Leventis’ conduct to determine if laws were broken.
If he did, it will no doubt result in a huge scandal not only for the Senator, but also for the Legislative Audit Council – which is supposed to be one of government’s most trustworthy, reputable agencies.
This is the second time this month that the LAC has come under fire – and deservedly so.
The agency is reportedly dragging its feet on an audit of the Workers’ Compensation Commission that is critical to South Carolina’s competitiveness as a state.
What’s the hold-up? Well, in the words of its director, the LAC is “fully staffed on other requests.”
Among those requests? A politically-motivated travel audit requested by S.C. Senate President Glenn McConnell – one of many travel investigations stemming from the scrutiny that has followed S.C. Gov. Mark Sanford’s “Argentine Connection.”
Oh, and this Department of Corrections “witch hunt.”
Meanwhile, Leventis continues to blast Corrections on a daily basis, calling on Sanford to fire Ozmint as recently as last week. He continues to deny that the firing of his racist campaign staffer has anything to do with his attacks.








Comments
By Brandon on September 23rd, 2009 at 3:43 pm
Repeat after me:
TERM LIMITS…TERM LIMITS…TERM LIMITS…
By Laura Campbell on September 23rd, 2009 at 5:16 pm
IF the above is true, how about putting him under real fire, as in firing his a##? Or does he have it like some politicos and others in Chesterfield County?
Electing them is like willingly giving oneself a case of ghonorrhea.
If we elect these people and pay them, why can’t we get them out of office when the evidence is presented and proved to be true? I know the dirty reasons, but still…
Do the people, and those decent who run for office, have any power anymore? Is it going to take an outright revolution in this country and the suffering of many to get our governing body back in order? Does the corrupt status quo not realize that the failing and suffering of those who elect and pay them will be their failing and suffering as well?
American Civil War, anybody? The French Revolution? The 1960s and ’70s in America? Ringing a bell, anyone? The common people were not the only ones who suffered and died.
Who will pay them if the common man has no job or is locked up or dead? These idiots learn nothing from history, the churches they attend, or the people they “represent”.
By Mab on September 23rd, 2009 at 6:21 pm
Leventis is bad news: a cancerous agent in law enforcement.
~My 59 1/2 cents~
By shay on September 23rd, 2009 at 7:58 pm
I ran across Ozmint years ago when he was with the AG’s office – State Grand Jury, I think – and he was nothing but professional. If the story’s true, I hope it comes to public light.
By Stinkbait on September 23rd, 2009 at 8:07 pm
Jon Ozmint and his distant predecessor, Bill Leeke, may be charm school dropouts, but they share qualities of professional integrity, vision & leadership seldom seen in state government. Ozmint came to SCDC with no prison experience, but has kept the roof on despite inmate population increases, legislature’s irresponsible budget reductions & more than a fair share of assorted loonies & homesteaders.
By scooter on September 23rd, 2009 at 8:21 pm
If true, sounds bad. But, Ozmint is not a stand up guy, either. SCDC has had problems for years now, and it is partly based on the denial of treatment for the inmates. We will get no change in behavior by simply locking people away. TREATMENT will help a number of folks change their behavior, thinking and skill levels. Some people will never change. But there are many, many people there that can change; they need the opportunity, and training and education to do so. You can not beat a dog until he loves you. And you can not turn your back on other people and say you are helping them change.
By BIN News on September 23rd, 2009 at 9:28 pm
Experience has proven that when sic(k) willie bloviates like the South bound end of a North bound constipated pig, he is usually lying or posting rumors he can’t prove. Like every day? What a stunning not-shock.
At least he has admitted on WISTV that he posts rumors which may not be true. You know. Wacko things he has no idea about. Fiction?
By Stinkbait on September 24th, 2009 at 4:41 am
Regrettably, Scooter has a valid point, but has laid blame in the wrong place. As necessary as treatment programs are, the underlying responsibility is to protect public safety. The legislature’s lack of collective guts to impose anything but across-the-board budget cuts requires SCDC to absorb the same percentage share of the pain as the cosmotology board & Confederate Relic Room. Nobody in SCDC ever underestimated the importance of proactive inmate programs, but there’s too little resources now for much more than feeding, fighting & headcounting. Given the circumstances, SCDC is doing far better than should be expected — & Senator Leventis’ vendetta is very unhelpful.
By Bin There on September 24th, 2009 at 8:24 am
Senator McConnell is not the Senate Majority Leader. He is President Pro Tempore…if you are going to blog it, get it right…
By Silence Dogood on September 25th, 2009 at 8:16 pm
Who is Leventis confidant (neighbor) that he is allegedly protecting? This story seems to be in two places at once on the LAC – either Leventis knew the results and improperly released them to WIS or there is nothing daming in the report as later indicated in the story – it doesn’t seem like it could be both???
By Martha Washington on October 17th, 2009 at 1:01 pm
People need to realize that everything is SMOKE AND MIRRORS. Things are not as they seem.
I repeat: things are not as they seem. What is released to the media is a version of what is really happening. This ios the case in ALL NEWS from government entites and banks and the like. They twist and manipulate and put out lies about people trying to expose them.
So i have no opinion on Leventis, but i am sure there is more to this than meets the eye.
The prison system is riddled with extortion. There are so many companies that sell primarily to the prison system and pad their bills of laden. You heard of the $500 toilet seat?
What would you think if own law enforcement leaders and car dealerships were working together dealing drugs?
Also, governments will be letting out criminals and illegal aliens as the economy worsens. If you dont have a gun, you’d BETTER get one because the loosed criminals will be coming to a town near you.