Keeney’s “Colleagues” Discuss Her Outing

chatter teeth

It hasn’t quite reached the crescendo of the FITS comment boards, but members of the erotic fiction website once frequented by Bridget Keeney (a.k.a. former S.C. Board of Education Chairwoman Kristin Maguire) are also having a field day over our recent “Sex Education” story.

Over a hundred comments have already been posted in response to our link, which was posted to the website by a member who once swapped erotic stories with Maguire’s alleged alter-ego.

So what do Maguire’s one-time “porn pen pals” think of her being outed?

You can read the responses for yourself by clicking here

Follow FITSNews on Twitter and like us on Facebook

Tags: , ,

Comments

  1. By BIN News Editorial Staff September 8, 2009 at 7:35 pm

    Who cares about “Bridget”? No one. Except the brazillions of SC school kids who you and Howie would leave behind with his voucher scam. Howie’s voucher scam is even more dead than Jakie could have even imagined. The only place to find a voucher clown these days in hiding under a rock. Right place.

    BIN News Editorial Staff
    Flair and Balanced
    But Trying Not to Gloat Too Much

    Reply

  2. By Todd September 8, 2009 at 11:26 pm

    BIN: My child is in a public high school in Richland 1 because I cannot afford private schools. The language arts teachers are so pathetic we have had to hire a tutor to teach my child to write an essay for the SAT. The whining principal constantly tells us he cannot hire language arts teachers in this district who know how to write an essay or actually can speak the king’s English. He cannot upset the race balance. Oh, yeah. They have advanced degrees from colleges in our state that receive special consideration. Richland 1′s Board could give a rat’s ass about educating children so long as their chosen ones receive fat salaries.

    Reply

  3. By CNSYD September 9, 2009 at 5:09 pm

    A superintendent of vocational ed told me years ago he was visited by the OCR. They asked him what was the percentage of the minorities that were employed by his district. He replied that he had never really ever figured that out but give him a few minutes. He did a calculation and replied that it was 12%. The OCR rep went beserk and screamed that a county that had a majority black population only employed 12% in the vocational ed system! That is disgraceful! The superintendent replied that the question posed was not how many blacks were employed but how many minorities. So he had given him the percentage of whites as the were the minority. The rep got all flustered and screamed “that is not how you determine a minority!”. So do you better understand the problem?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

*