<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Palmetto One: Aloft Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/08/26/palmetto-one-aloft-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/08/26/palmetto-one-aloft-again/</link>
	<description>Politics, Sports and Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 20:47:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oh Really?</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/08/26/palmetto-one-aloft-again/#comment-65971</link>
		<dc:creator>Oh Really?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 16:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=28047#comment-65971</guid>
		<description>N1SC as listed on the http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N1SC Generally if a tail number is removed it returns a message like this http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N8JR  While I too checked the FAA N Number Registry (certainly knew some pilots would pick up on that) the point was that a generally accepted tracking site, was made unavailable or worse, in error, on the tracking of taxpayer assets.  Something flew with that tail number 33 weeks ago that was registered to the State of South Carolina.  Good Day...out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>N1SC as listed on the <a href="http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N1SC" rel="nofollow">http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N1SC</a> Generally if a tail number is removed it returns a message like this <a href="http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N8JR" rel="nofollow">http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N8JR</a>  While I too checked the FAA N Number Registry (certainly knew some pilots would pick up on that) the point was that a generally accepted tracking site, was made unavailable or worse, in error, on the tracking of taxpayer assets.  Something flew with that tail number 33 weeks ago that was registered to the State of South Carolina.  Good Day&#8230;out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gina</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/08/26/palmetto-one-aloft-again/#comment-65905</link>
		<dc:creator>Gina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=28047#comment-65905</guid>
		<description>so who was flying?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so who was flying?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clemson Flyer</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/08/26/palmetto-one-aloft-again/#comment-65809</link>
		<dc:creator>Clemson Flyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=28047#comment-65809</guid>
		<description>N1SC is registered as a Beech 300 by the FAA (http://registry.faa.gov/aircraftinquiry/NNum_Results.aspx?NNumbertxt=N1SC).  The aircraft has likely opted out of public availability of flight tracking (http://www.nbaa.org/ops/security/barr/).  This is probably for security concerns, as flight logs for the aircraft are posted for public inspection on the Division of Aeronautics website.

The online tracking sites that show the last flight being 33 weeks ago are likely from either a glitch in the database, a typo on a flight plan, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>N1SC is registered as a Beech 300 by the FAA (<a href="http://registry.faa.gov/aircraftinquiry/NNum_Results.aspx?NNumbertxt=N1SC" rel="nofollow">http://registry.faa.gov/aircraftinquiry/NNum_Results.aspx?NNumbertxt=N1SC</a>).  The aircraft has likely opted out of public availability of flight tracking (<a href="http://www.nbaa.org/ops/security/barr/" rel="nofollow">http://www.nbaa.org/ops/security/barr/</a>).  This is probably for security concerns, as flight logs for the aircraft are posted for public inspection on the Division of Aeronautics website.</p>
<p>The online tracking sites that show the last flight being 33 weeks ago are likely from either a glitch in the database, a typo on a flight plan, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More Plane Talk from FAA</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/08/26/palmetto-one-aloft-again/#comment-65807</link>
		<dc:creator>More Plane Talk from FAA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=28047#comment-65807</guid>
		<description>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
FAA REGISTRY 
N-Number Inquiry Results 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 

N1SC is Assigned 
  
  
 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 Aircraft Description  
  
  Serial Number FL-9  Type Registration Government   
 Manufacturer Name BEECH  Certificate Issue Date 01/30/1998  
 Model B300  Status Valid  
 Type Aircraft Fixed Wing Multi-Engine Type Engine Turbo-prop  
 Pending Number Change None Dealer No  
 Date Change Authorized None Mode S Code 50000625  
 MFR Year 1990 Fractional Owner NO   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 Registered Owner  
  
  Name STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA    
 Street PO BOX 280068   
    
 City COLUMBIA  State SOUTH CAROLINA   
 County RICHLAND  Zip Code 29228-0068  
 Country UNITED STATES   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 Airworthiness  
  
  Engine Manufacturer P&amp;W  Classification Standard   
  Engine Model PT6A SER  Category Commuter   
   A/W Date 03/30/1993</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>FAA REGISTRY<br />
N-Number Inquiry Results </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>N1SC is Assigned </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p> Aircraft Description  </p>
<p>  Serial Number FL-9  Type Registration Government<br />
 Manufacturer Name BEECH  Certificate Issue Date 01/30/1998<br />
 Model B300  Status Valid<br />
 Type Aircraft Fixed Wing Multi-Engine Type Engine Turbo-prop<br />
 Pending Number Change None Dealer No<br />
 Date Change Authorized None Mode S Code 50000625<br />
 MFR Year 1990 Fractional Owner NO   </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p> Registered Owner  </p>
<p>  Name STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA<br />
 Street PO BOX 280068   </p>
<p> City COLUMBIA  State SOUTH CAROLINA<br />
 County RICHLAND  Zip Code 29228-0068<br />
 Country UNITED STATES   </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p> Airworthiness  </p>
<p>  Engine Manufacturer P&amp;W  Classification Standard<br />
  Engine Model PT6A SER  Category Commuter<br />
   A/W Date 03/30/1993</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plane Talk</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/08/26/palmetto-one-aloft-again/#comment-65805</link>
		<dc:creator>Plane Talk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=28047#comment-65805</guid>
		<description>Aircraft Registration (N1SC)
Aircraft Summary 
Summary Owner Airworthiness Serial Number 
1990 BEECH B300
Fixed wing multi engine
(19 seats / 2 engines) STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
COLUMBIA, SC
(Government) Standard/Commuter FL-9 
Aircraft Details 
Engine Weight Speed Mode S Code 
P&amp;W PT6A SER 
Horsepower: 750 (Turbo-prop) 12,500-19,999lbs Not defined 50000625 
Registration Details 

Status Certificate Issue Date Airworthiness Date Last Action Date 
Triennial mailed  1998-01-30 1993-03-30 2008-04-15</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aircraft Registration (N1SC)<br />
Aircraft Summary<br />
Summary Owner Airworthiness Serial Number<br />
1990 BEECH B300<br />
Fixed wing multi engine<br />
(19 seats / 2 engines) STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA<br />
COLUMBIA, SC<br />
(Government) Standard/Commuter FL-9<br />
Aircraft Details<br />
Engine Weight Speed Mode S Code<br />
P&amp;W PT6A SER<br />
Horsepower: 750 (Turbo-prop) 12,500-19,999lbs Not defined 50000625<br />
Registration Details </p>
<p>Status Certificate Issue Date Airworthiness Date Last Action Date<br />
Triennial mailed  1998-01-30 1993-03-30 2008-04-15</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oh Really?</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/08/26/palmetto-one-aloft-again/#comment-65785</link>
		<dc:creator>Oh Really?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=28047#comment-65785</guid>
		<description>The tail number on that plane is registered to the state but for a Cessna 172, which is about $2 million dollars difference in price.  I wonder how the FAA and the state have gotten that wrong in the database.  According to FAA records via flightaware.com that tail number (N1SC)has not filed a flight plan in over 33 weeks. Hard to believe the FAA would allow that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tail number on that plane is registered to the state but for a Cessna 172, which is about $2 million dollars difference in price.  I wonder how the FAA and the state have gotten that wrong in the database.  According to FAA records via flightaware.com that tail number (N1SC)has not filed a flight plan in over 33 weeks. Hard to believe the FAA would allow that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not Sayin', Just Sayin'</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/08/26/palmetto-one-aloft-again/#comment-65751</link>
		<dc:creator>Not Sayin', Just Sayin'</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=28047#comment-65751</guid>
		<description>Ah, a tourism development mission to Marlboro, Darlington, Chesterfield Counties. They couldn&#039;t squeeze in Dillon County, too? After all, it does have the greatest tourist draw of the four counties: South of the Border.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, a tourism development mission to Marlboro, Darlington, Chesterfield Counties. They couldn&#8217;t squeeze in Dillon County, too? After all, it does have the greatest tourist draw of the four counties: South of the Border.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

