<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Whose &#8220;Nat-see&#8221; Flic Is Better?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/08/22/whose-nat-see-flic-is-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/08/22/whose-nat-see-flic-is-better/</link>
	<description>Politics, Sports and Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:11:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: People soo STUPID</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/08/22/whose-nat-see-flic-is-better/#comment-65425</link>
		<dc:creator>People soo STUPID</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=27744#comment-65425</guid>
		<description>We all know that Bard would not say that about Tom Cruise.  I&#039;ve seen Valkyrie and I went to see Inglourious Bastards.  Two completely different movies, each were great movies in my opinion.  The media loves to kick up dirt or even create dirt where it never even existed.  

Has anyone seen Tom Cruise official blog?  Found it on Tom Cruise official website www.TomCruise.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all know that Bard would not say that about Tom Cruise.  I&#8217;ve seen Valkyrie and I went to see Inglourious Bastards.  Two completely different movies, each were great movies in my opinion.  The media loves to kick up dirt or even create dirt where it never even existed.  </p>
<p>Has anyone seen Tom Cruise official blog?  Found it on Tom Cruise official website <a href="http://www.TomCruise.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.TomCruise.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: political hack</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/08/22/whose-nat-see-flic-is-better/#comment-65315</link>
		<dc:creator>political hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 14:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=27744#comment-65315</guid>
		<description>They need to make a modern movie about World War I, but make it well, so we really know how far we really haven&#039;t advanced as a civilized society.

Don&#039;t let Michael Bay get ahold of any historical war movie, Pearl Harbor was utter garbage.

Nod goes to the Dirty Dozen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They need to make a modern movie about World War I, but make it well, so we really know how far we really haven&#8217;t advanced as a civilized society.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t let Michael Bay get ahold of any historical war movie, Pearl Harbor was utter garbage.</p>
<p>Nod goes to the Dirty Dozen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technology</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/08/22/whose-nat-see-flic-is-better/#comment-65305</link>
		<dc:creator>Technology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=27744#comment-65305</guid>
		<description>That doesn&#039;t sound like Brad. It will probably turn out to be a lie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That doesn&#8217;t sound like Brad. It will probably turn out to be a lie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yella Bellied Coward</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/08/22/whose-nat-see-flic-is-better/#comment-65292</link>
		<dc:creator>Yella Bellied Coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 04:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=27744#comment-65292</guid>
		<description>Patton will always take the cake in this genre, with Saving Private Ryan a distant second... and though it isn&#039;t a movie, I would have to say Band of Brothers is a close third.

WWII movies never get old, and it is a testament to those who gave of themselves that their work is deserving of great films 60+ years after their return from battle. God Bless that generation for literally saving the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patton will always take the cake in this genre, with Saving Private Ryan a distant second&#8230; and though it isn&#8217;t a movie, I would have to say Band of Brothers is a close third.</p>
<p>WWII movies never get old, and it is a testament to those who gave of themselves that their work is deserving of great films 60+ years after their return from battle. God Bless that generation for literally saving the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BIN News</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/08/22/whose-nat-see-flic-is-better/#comment-65286</link>
		<dc:creator>BIN News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 02:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=27744#comment-65286</guid>
		<description>sic(k) willie. The original inglourious bastard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sic(k) willie. The original inglourious bastard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doyle</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/08/22/whose-nat-see-flic-is-better/#comment-65278</link>
		<dc:creator>Doyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 00:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=27744#comment-65278</guid>
		<description>How about &quot;The Dirty Dozen&quot; and &quot;The Great Escape&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about &#8220;The Dirty Dozen&#8221; and &#8220;The Great Escape&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

