White House Spam
We were going to do an article today about how U.S. Secretary General … err President Barack Obama could reform health care in this country by blocking pharmaceutical spam.
Seriously, people … every five seconds another friggin’ Cialis or Viagra spam-mail pops up in our comments section, which understandably infuriates our founding editor.
“Like Mix-A-Lot said I am long, strong and I’m down to get the friction on,” Sic says angrily. “Why do they keep spamming me with this crap I don’t need?”
Unfortunately, instead of working to prevent spam, Obama and his socialized medicine minions are flooding American email inboxes with unsolicited emails about their “health care reform” plan.
And Americans are pissed off about it.
From Politico:
The complaints concerned a 1,500-word e-mail sent Thursday in the name of White House senior adviser David Axelrod, including “8 common myths about health insurance reform.” The e-mail mimicked the style of chain e-mails attacking President Barack Obama’s health-reform plan. The subject line: “Something worth forwarding.”
The White House had sent other e-mails to the list without complaint.
Fox News’ Major Garrett had a lengthy exchange about the matter with White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs at the televised briefing on Thursday.
Garrett said: “[F]olks have emailed me … [who] would like to know how they get an e-mail from the White House when they have never asked for one.”
Gibbs replied: “I’d have to look and see.”
Yeah, you “look and see.” Spammer.
Three days later, the Obama administration said that it was “implementing measures to make subscribing to e-mails clearer.”
Wait … does that mean this is all the “spamee’s” fault?
Comments
By PasserBy on August 18th, 2009 at 4:54 pm
No, it can’t be the “spamee’s” fault, but there is no other answer. Therefore, the only solution: we need a new gov’t agency in charge of dealing with “spamee’s guilt”, and a new federal czar & agency to handle it. We can call him ‘King [of] Spam’ as a term of endearment.
By PasserBy on August 19th, 2009 at 6:36 am
No, it can’t be the “spamee’s” fault, but there is no other answer. Therefore, the only solution: we need a new gov’t agency in charge of dealing with “spamee’s guilt”, and a new federal czar & agency to handle it. We can call him ‘King [of] Spam’ as a term of endearment.
Sorry, forgot to add great post! Can’t wait to see your next post!