<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sick To Our Stomachs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/07/28/sick-to-our-stomachs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/07/28/sick-to-our-stomachs/</link>
	<description>Unfair ... Imbalanced</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 03:55:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/07/28/sick-to-our-stomachs/comment-page-1/#comment-62798</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=26317#comment-62798</guid>
		<description>Tort Reform is a red herring.  We already have tort &quot;reform&quot; in South Carolina, and it has not materially reduced the cost of care.  At first we were told frivolous law suites were the cause of the health care crisis.  Then we found out that the total awards for of all malpractice actions nation wide, legitimate and &quot;frivolous&quot;, made up less than 1.00% of medical costs, and significantly less than the drug industry spends on advertising to the public for ed medication each year. Nonetheless we enacted non-economic damages caps in SC and as predicted by the opponents of that bill, it has not materially reduced the cost of insurance or medical care in SC, or increased the percentage of people insured.   

Now they have abandoned the frivolous law suit argument, and say it is defensive medicine caused by frivolous law suits that is the real problem.  So let me get this straight.  You are a doctor.  A guy comes into your office and says I am having difficulty breathing and my chest hurts.  You can listen to his heart, have him breath and say sounds like a chest cold to me, charge him $50 and send him on his way (90% of the time you will be right); or you can say, “Let’s do an EKG,” rule out heart attack and charge him $300.  Is the very small possibility of being sued really the motivating factor in your decision here, and what is the right decision?  If the doc goes with the chest cold option, you have a heart attack, lose your job, lose your family’s health care coverage, lose your home, are forced into bankruptcy, and the response of the doc is, oops I guess you are in that unlucky 10%, but at least we saved you $300, how will you feel?

Regardless of which of the three major groups you are in on this issue (i.e government health care (Democrats), do nothing material (Republicans), or everyone should be responsible for their own health care and let the sick people who can&#039;t afford health insurance die (Libertarians)) we need to stop letting the insurance industry, the drug industry and the medical profession shift the blame for the cost of health care in the country.  Small Businesses, like mine, can no longer afford the current health care system.  It has to change in some way, and soon.  Otherwise more and more people will be without health insurance as small businesses are forced to drop employee coverage.  While I am willing to listen to all options, so far the Republican response to small business can be boiled down to, stop insuring your employees their health care is their problem not yours.  The problem is that is not true.  Sick employees are my problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tort Reform is a red herring.  We already have tort &#8220;reform&#8221; in South Carolina, and it has not materially reduced the cost of care.  At first we were told frivolous law suites were the cause of the health care crisis.  Then we found out that the total awards for of all malpractice actions nation wide, legitimate and &#8220;frivolous&#8221;, made up less than 1.00% of medical costs, and significantly less than the drug industry spends on advertising to the public for ed medication each year. Nonetheless we enacted non-economic damages caps in SC and as predicted by the opponents of that bill, it has not materially reduced the cost of insurance or medical care in SC, or increased the percentage of people insured.   </p>
<p>Now they have abandoned the frivolous law suit argument, and say it is defensive medicine caused by frivolous law suits that is the real problem.  So let me get this straight.  You are a doctor.  A guy comes into your office and says I am having difficulty breathing and my chest hurts.  You can listen to his heart, have him breath and say sounds like a chest cold to me, charge him $50 and send him on his way (90% of the time you will be right); or you can say, “Let’s do an EKG,” rule out heart attack and charge him $300.  Is the very small possibility of being sued really the motivating factor in your decision here, and what is the right decision?  If the doc goes with the chest cold option, you have a heart attack, lose your job, lose your family’s health care coverage, lose your home, are forced into bankruptcy, and the response of the doc is, oops I guess you are in that unlucky 10%, but at least we saved you $300, how will you feel?</p>
<p>Regardless of which of the three major groups you are in on this issue (i.e government health care (Democrats), do nothing material (Republicans), or everyone should be responsible for their own health care and let the sick people who can&#8217;t afford health insurance die (Libertarians)) we need to stop letting the insurance industry, the drug industry and the medical profession shift the blame for the cost of health care in the country.  Small Businesses, like mine, can no longer afford the current health care system.  It has to change in some way, and soon.  Otherwise more and more people will be without health insurance as small businesses are forced to drop employee coverage.  While I am willing to listen to all options, so far the Republican response to small business can be boiled down to, stop insuring your employees their health care is their problem not yours.  The problem is that is not true.  Sick employees are my problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dusk McCoy</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/07/28/sick-to-our-stomachs/comment-page-1/#comment-62763</link>
		<dc:creator>Dusk McCoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 02:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=26317#comment-62763</guid>
		<description>The Truth,
           Let&#039;s not forget dialysis patients, as pt with ESRD on dialysis therapy have a 90% mortality rate over 5 years. I&#039;m sure the neonatologists, nephrologists, geriatricians, pulmonologists, and oncologists are pissed.

          At least the trial lawyers will fat and happy with their man calling the shots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Truth,<br />
           Let&#8217;s not forget dialysis patients, as pt with ESRD on dialysis therapy have a 90% mortality rate over 5 years. I&#8217;m sure the neonatologists, nephrologists, geriatricians, pulmonologists, and oncologists are pissed.</p>
<p>          At least the trial lawyers will fat and happy with their man calling the shots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/07/28/sick-to-our-stomachs/comment-page-1/#comment-62747</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=26317#comment-62747</guid>
		<description>Hey Pat Hendrix,

&quot;I bet you a thousand dollars that Demint doesn’t know what country Waterloo is in. He probably thinks it’s a theme ride at Six Flags.&quot;


=


You are a condescending, liberal douchebag.  If you love socialized medicine so damn much, then move to Canada...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Pat Hendrix,</p>
<p>&#8220;I bet you a thousand dollars that Demint doesn’t know what country Waterloo is in. He probably thinks it’s a theme ride at Six Flags.&#8221;</p>
<p>=</p>
<p>You are a condescending, liberal douchebag.  If you love socialized medicine so damn much, then move to Canada&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Hendrix</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/07/28/sick-to-our-stomachs/comment-page-1/#comment-62725</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Hendrix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=26317#comment-62725</guid>
		<description>Rick,

On the larger point, we couldn&#039;t agree more. If you want to see real change in this country, start with a constitutional amendment to have term limits. Both parties are beholden to special interest groups. Note that both parties, and Bush and Obama, supported TARP. Enough said.

As for tort reform, I don&#039;t know if that would be enough to substantively change the cost equation. I suspect not. But I agree that it should be on the table.

Pat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick,</p>
<p>On the larger point, we couldn&#8217;t agree more. If you want to see real change in this country, start with a constitutional amendment to have term limits. Both parties are beholden to special interest groups. Note that both parties, and Bush and Obama, supported TARP. Enough said.</p>
<p>As for tort reform, I don&#8217;t know if that would be enough to substantively change the cost equation. I suspect not. But I agree that it should be on the table.</p>
<p>Pat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/07/28/sick-to-our-stomachs/comment-page-1/#comment-62721</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=26317#comment-62721</guid>
		<description>Pat, and if you had his plan you wouldn&#039;t complain either. The point I&#039;m trying to make is these guys know what you&#039;re going to get and want no part of it. Until they&#039;re forced to live by the laws they write, all the complaining won&#039;t change a thing. This isn&#039;t a party issue, it&#039;s your parents and grandparents that pay the price for our not standing up and refusing to be herded like animals to the slaughter. Look Pat, these guys think they&#039;re not only smarter than you, their heros in their mind trying to convince you of their worthiness so you&#039;ll vote for them. Ultimetly these clowns couldn&#039;t care less about you and thats across party lines. They have only one interest, getting re-elected. As long as enough noise is made about reform and the need for it, like a teenager trying to get his first taste, they&#039;ll try anything to convince you they love you and wouldn&#039;t think less of you in the morning. You want reform in the health system....look first to tort reform and the costs associated with defensive medicine, but being lawyers, why would they cut their own opportunities to feed at the trough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat, and if you had his plan you wouldn&#8217;t complain either. The point I&#8217;m trying to make is these guys know what you&#8217;re going to get and want no part of it. Until they&#8217;re forced to live by the laws they write, all the complaining won&#8217;t change a thing. This isn&#8217;t a party issue, it&#8217;s your parents and grandparents that pay the price for our not standing up and refusing to be herded like animals to the slaughter. Look Pat, these guys think they&#8217;re not only smarter than you, their heros in their mind trying to convince you of their worthiness so you&#8217;ll vote for them. Ultimetly these clowns couldn&#8217;t care less about you and thats across party lines. They have only one interest, getting re-elected. As long as enough noise is made about reform and the need for it, like a teenager trying to get his first taste, they&#8217;ll try anything to convince you they love you and wouldn&#8217;t think less of you in the morning. You want reform in the health system&#8230;.look first to tort reform and the costs associated with defensive medicine, but being lawyers, why would they cut their own opportunities to feed at the trough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Truth</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/07/28/sick-to-our-stomachs/comment-page-1/#comment-62719</link>
		<dc:creator>The Truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=26317#comment-62719</guid>
		<description>This is going to be Obama&#039;s Waterloo!  It is truly interesting that Teddy &quot;the swimmer&quot; Kennedy would not qualify for his treatment for brain cancer under this new Obamacare plan.  I wonder if people really understand what this means for them personally.  No cardiac bypass at 50 yoa (just not worth it).  If you apply cost analysis to making healthcare decisions (as Obama has suggested) the following would certainly be excluded:
1. AIDS / HIV care - not cost effective
2. Cancer treatment for most cancers (excludes basal cell, endometrial, and a few other curable cancers.
3. Heart bypass after 60 yoa
4. Cardiac stenting after 65 yoa
5. Premature infant care if born earlier than 32 weeks (not cost effective)
6. Any correction of heart defects on infants.
ect, ect, ect.

You democrats might get what you are asking for.  We expect you to agree with the damn plan too!  I will fight it until then.  When Obama was asked during his pitiful press conference if he would live with the same guidelines, he avoided the answer.  What a pompous SOB!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is going to be Obama&#8217;s Waterloo!  It is truly interesting that Teddy &#8220;the swimmer&#8221; Kennedy would not qualify for his treatment for brain cancer under this new Obamacare plan.  I wonder if people really understand what this means for them personally.  No cardiac bypass at 50 yoa (just not worth it).  If you apply cost analysis to making healthcare decisions (as Obama has suggested) the following would certainly be excluded:<br />
1. AIDS / HIV care &#8211; not cost effective<br />
2. Cancer treatment for most cancers (excludes basal cell, endometrial, and a few other curable cancers.<br />
3. Heart bypass after 60 yoa<br />
4. Cardiac stenting after 65 yoa<br />
5. Premature infant care if born earlier than 32 weeks (not cost effective)<br />
6. Any correction of heart defects on infants.<br />
ect, ect, ect.</p>
<p>You democrats might get what you are asking for.  We expect you to agree with the damn plan too!  I will fight it until then.  When Obama was asked during his pitiful press conference if he would live with the same guidelines, he avoided the answer.  What a pompous SOB!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roofus</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/07/28/sick-to-our-stomachs/comment-page-1/#comment-62712</link>
		<dc:creator>roofus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=26317#comment-62712</guid>
		<description>T4,
         Look at DeMin&#039;ts web site, I mean &quot;web number&quot; according to VP Biden...his proposals are there...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T4,<br />
         Look at DeMin&#8217;ts web site, I mean &#8220;web number&#8221; according to VP Biden&#8230;his proposals are there&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T4</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/07/28/sick-to-our-stomachs/comment-page-1/#comment-62708</link>
		<dc:creator>T4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=26317#comment-62708</guid>
		<description>Roofus,

1. Please tell us what the Honorable Demint offers in the way of healthcare, then give me 5 dems. that have studied the proposal beyond the first page.  Afterall, we have to have a few &#039;socialist&#039; votes.  

2.Obviously, very few of you, if any, work in healthcare.  When was the last time you were released from a fee schedule to determine your own fees, which you knew were feasible for reimbursement.  Socialized medicine, Obama&#039;s plan...whatever.  It&#039;s already here!

3.  And define libertarian, I guarantee you everyone has a different definition...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roofus,</p>
<p>1. Please tell us what the Honorable Demint offers in the way of healthcare, then give me 5 dems. that have studied the proposal beyond the first page.  Afterall, we have to have a few &#8217;socialist&#8217; votes.  </p>
<p>2.Obviously, very few of you, if any, work in healthcare.  When was the last time you were released from a fee schedule to determine your own fees, which you knew were feasible for reimbursement.  Socialized medicine, Obama&#8217;s plan&#8230;whatever.  It&#8217;s already here!</p>
<p>3.  And define libertarian, I guarantee you everyone has a different definition&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Hendrix</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/07/28/sick-to-our-stomachs/comment-page-1/#comment-62706</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Hendrix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=26317#comment-62706</guid>
		<description>Rick,

That&#039;s the irony. Demint is already on a government health insurance plan. I notice that he and his family don&#039;t seem to complain.

Roofus, &quot;fleeting mirth&quot;? You&#039;ve been reading too many of Mande&#039;s posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the irony. Demint is already on a government health insurance plan. I notice that he and his family don&#8217;t seem to complain.</p>
<p>Roofus, &#8220;fleeting mirth&#8221;? You&#8217;ve been reading too many of Mande&#8217;s posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/07/28/sick-to-our-stomachs/comment-page-1/#comment-62693</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=26317#comment-62693</guid>
		<description>Yep Reuters and Yahoo news are impartial perveyors of unvarnished truth. The ultimate question that every American should be asking of the 3 branches of government is: Are you willing to remove yourself and family from all existing medical plans and forever more be a member of the care you are advocating. If not, then no American should buy into what these clowns are selling. If they show their commitment by being the first to enroll, then we can bet its pretty good. The disingenuousness of the legislative branch saying they cannot move to the proposed plan is a bold lie. They make the rules....They&#039;re just smart enough to remove themselves and their families from a plan that would kill Kennedy since his return on investment quotient would be nonexistent. And this doesn&#039;t address the cause of freedom and personal responsibility....something many liberals have no clue about except it makes them remove the blankets off their heads, crawl out from under the bed and realize there is no such thing as FAIR and mommy will not always make the bad man go away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep Reuters and Yahoo news are impartial perveyors of unvarnished truth. The ultimate question that every American should be asking of the 3 branches of government is: Are you willing to remove yourself and family from all existing medical plans and forever more be a member of the care you are advocating. If not, then no American should buy into what these clowns are selling. If they show their commitment by being the first to enroll, then we can bet its pretty good. The disingenuousness of the legislative branch saying they cannot move to the proposed plan is a bold lie. They make the rules&#8230;.They&#8217;re just smart enough to remove themselves and their families from a plan that would kill Kennedy since his return on investment quotient would be nonexistent. And this doesn&#8217;t address the cause of freedom and personal responsibility&#8230;.something many liberals have no clue about except it makes them remove the blankets off their heads, crawl out from under the bed and realize there is no such thing as FAIR and mommy will not always make the bad man go away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->