<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sotomayor: Dancing Around The Obvious</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/07/14/sotomayor-dancing-around-the-obvious/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/07/14/sotomayor-dancing-around-the-obvious/</link>
	<description>Politics, Sports and Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:36:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/07/14/sotomayor-dancing-around-the-obvious/#comment-61904</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 15:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=25564#comment-61904</guid>
		<description>I hate Lindsey Graham.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate Lindsey Graham.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not Sayin', Just Sayin'</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/07/14/sotomayor-dancing-around-the-obvious/#comment-61386</link>
		<dc:creator>Not Sayin', Just Sayin'</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=25564#comment-61386</guid>
		<description>A racist president picked a racist for the supreme court. Shocker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A racist president picked a racist for the supreme court. Shocker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Hendrix</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/07/14/sotomayor-dancing-around-the-obvious/#comment-61384</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Hendrix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=25564#comment-61384</guid>
		<description>&quot;But when I look at those cases, I have to say to myself, and I do say to myself, &quot;You know, this could be your grandfather, this could be your grandmother. They were not citizens at one time, and they were people who came to this country&quot;
When I get a case about discrimination, I have to think about people in my own family who suffered discrimination because of their ethnic background or because of religion or because of gender. And I do take that into account.&quot;

Italian Supremacist and Empath Justice Alito.

By the way, he sided in favor of the Italian-Americans in Ricci v. DeStefano.

In any event, I love the fact you have Jefferson Beauregard Sessions doing the questioning. Yeah, the same guy who said a white lawyer was a &quot;disgrace to his race&quot; for defending black defendants. And the same guy who said that he thought the KKK was okay until he discovered some of the members smoked weed. The same guy who referred to black lawyers as &quot;boys&quot; and warned a black employee that he &quot;better be careful what you say to white folks.&quot; According to testimony, he was just joking. Hillarious.

Brillaint move.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But when I look at those cases, I have to say to myself, and I do say to myself, &#8220;You know, this could be your grandfather, this could be your grandmother. They were not citizens at one time, and they were people who came to this country&#8221;<br />
When I get a case about discrimination, I have to think about people in my own family who suffered discrimination because of their ethnic background or because of religion or because of gender. And I do take that into account.&#8221;</p>
<p>Italian Supremacist and Empath Justice Alito.</p>
<p>By the way, he sided in favor of the Italian-Americans in Ricci v. DeStefano.</p>
<p>In any event, I love the fact you have Jefferson Beauregard Sessions doing the questioning. Yeah, the same guy who said a white lawyer was a &#8220;disgrace to his race&#8221; for defending black defendants. And the same guy who said that he thought the KKK was okay until he discovered some of the members smoked weed. The same guy who referred to black lawyers as &#8220;boys&#8221; and warned a black employee that he &#8220;better be careful what you say to white folks.&#8221; According to testimony, he was just joking. Hillarious.</p>
<p>Brillaint move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recovering Lobbyist</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/07/14/sotomayor-dancing-around-the-obvious/#comment-61382</link>
		<dc:creator>Recovering Lobbyist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=25564#comment-61382</guid>
		<description>I thought Senator Graham&#039;s comments were direct and on point.  Whether she is a racist, or not, is not as important as the fact that she made racist comments and got a pass from the PC police.  I think Graham sent a loud warning to the PC purveyors--if we are going to have political correctness, it will apply to everyone.  I doubt he accomplished much, but Senator Graham gets a thumbs up from me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Senator Graham&#8217;s comments were direct and on point.  Whether she is a racist, or not, is not as important as the fact that she made racist comments and got a pass from the PC police.  I think Graham sent a loud warning to the PC purveyors&#8211;if we are going to have political correctness, it will apply to everyone.  I doubt he accomplished much, but Senator Graham gets a thumbs up from me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toyota Kawaski</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/07/14/sotomayor-dancing-around-the-obvious/#comment-61379</link>
		<dc:creator>Toyota Kawaski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=25564#comment-61379</guid>
		<description>the &quot;Latina woman experience&quot; thats what Gov.Moonbeam had a taste of</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the &#8220;Latina woman experience&#8221; thats what Gov.Moonbeam had a taste of</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/07/14/sotomayor-dancing-around-the-obvious/#comment-61347</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 23:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=25564#comment-61347</guid>
		<description>true diversity exists in diversity of thought, not diversity of skin color.  is it more important to have nine justices who are all different colors but all think the same, or to have nine justices who can think independent, logical thoughts that lead them to fair and impartial judicial rulings?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>true diversity exists in diversity of thought, not diversity of skin color.  is it more important to have nine justices who are all different colors but all think the same, or to have nine justices who can think independent, logical thoughts that lead them to fair and impartial judicial rulings?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: w</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/07/14/sotomayor-dancing-around-the-obvious/#comment-61335</link>
		<dc:creator>w</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=25564#comment-61335</guid>
		<description>ugh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ugh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crooner</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/07/14/sotomayor-dancing-around-the-obvious/#comment-61331</link>
		<dc:creator>Crooner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=25564#comment-61331</guid>
		<description>Oh come on.  Do you really believe she thought that being a wise Latina woman would allow her to make better decisions?  Or is her assertion that it was for inspiration more likely?

Everyone views everything they face through the prism of their life experiences.  The white male experience isn&#039;t the default.  That&#039;s why diversity is important.  It&#039;s also why appeals courts consist of panels of judges instead of just one.

Interesting, though, watching one who was denied a seat on the bench by his racist past lead the charge for the Republicans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh come on.  Do you really believe she thought that being a wise Latina woman would allow her to make better decisions?  Or is her assertion that it was for inspiration more likely?</p>
<p>Everyone views everything they face through the prism of their life experiences.  The white male experience isn&#8217;t the default.  That&#8217;s why diversity is important.  It&#8217;s also why appeals courts consist of panels of judges instead of just one.</p>
<p>Interesting, though, watching one who was denied a seat on the bench by his racist past lead the charge for the Republicans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

