Or is it just a matter of what the interpretation of the words “hand him over on a silver platter” is?

Furthermore, I never stated 50% of Americans are pussies. The fact is, a vast majority of Americans support enhanced interrogation technigues. It is folks like default and you and your fellow kool-aid drinkers within the moveondotorg fold that think every word from Michael Moore’s food-gorged mouth are truth. A technique that causes NO physical damage would only be construed as torture within that cess-pool of whacked-out liberalism.

Where have all the Sam Nunn’s and Fritz Hollings of the Democrat Party gone?

Maybe, just maybe, the Russians know something you don’t.

The “nuclear shield” is the 21st century equivalent of the Maginot Line. No serious person thinks it could stop a ballistic strike, especially given the less than stellar “successful” tests. So yes, I’m still waiting to give my nod to it as a good use of defense dollars.

K Trane, where do I even begin? The Bush Adminstration took over a budget that was running an annual surplus of 300 billion and turned it into a trillion dollar deficit by the time he left office. The Obama Administration was left with a structural deficit and dredging economy that will leave us with a 1.8 debt (not 2.1). Yes, and the stimulus, which I did not support, will cause a one year spike in the debt. But aside from that one time expenditure, the Obama Adminstration has not behaved with anything approximating the recklessness of the previous adminstration which passed a tax cut that cost more than the stimulus and a war in Iraq that did as well. They also created an entirely new entitlement program that had no source of funding and did little more than ensure the profits of the phara companies. The expected costs according to CBO are 300 billion. According the CBO, which has an outstanding record, the Obama policies would create 900 billion less in deficits over 10 years than if we left the last adminstration’s policies in place (Bush and the congress used a series of gimmicks to mask the true numbers).

Here is a good read on the subject:

http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=2755

and

http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=46270d4d-61a1-4c1a-af71-92b5ddda9b6c

As for her percentages with the SC, I suggest you look at the record of Samuel Alito, who had a 100 percent strike out rate. Her percentage actually, is about average. Look into it.

We agree on corporate tax rates. They’re too high.

That never happened. You would know that if you read anything outside the conservative circle jerk of fitsnews. And even if true, the fact you personally called 50 percent of the country “pussies” has nothing to do with Bill Clinton. It does, however, call into question the personal stake you have in protecting this country. So let’s hear it, tough guy, what heavy lifting have you been doing?

After Bush and Cheney watched 9/11 happen on their watch they panicked.They made up the law as they went along. They went to Ashcroft’s hospital room and tried to get him to sign papers allowing spying on Americans.

We need an Attorney General with balls to prosecute these war criminals.Then start investigating and prosecuting companies who have stolen our money by war profiteering.

I don’t care if they never pass health care reform. I hope Congress does nothing but hold hearings on this illegal war .Please dont do anything for the next 4 years. All the laws Congress would pass are only to benefit the corporations that pay them off or make us go deeper into debt.

We prosecuted the woman who had the dog leash in Iraq and she was just following Rumsfeld’s and Cheney’s orders.

Let’s prosecute the powerful or we aren’t a nation of laws.

Is voting in a politician with a little over a year of experience as a Senator thinking intelligently?

Is placing a woman on the Supreme Court solely because she is a Latina woman (even though out of the 7 cases granted certiorari to the Supreme Court, she has been overruled by the Supreme Court 6 times) thinking intelligently? (Note: in the 1 case affirmed, her reasoning was unanimously faulted)

Is increasing Bush’s $200 Billion deficit to $2.1 Trillion dollars thinking intelligently?

Is raising the corporate tax rate to the point where businesses leave our country thinking intelligently? (Tim Horton’s just moved the Canada to take advantage of their tax incentives…Yes…Canada)

…Guess I’m a dumbass.

However, I don’t expect you to acknowledge that Reagan was right.

(Ironically, when N. Korea and Iran and China and Pakistan are dramatically increasing their missile technology, Obama has reduced funding on the defence shield)…Surpised anyone?