<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Educrat Union Seeks $300,000 In &#8220;Stimulus&#8221; Legal Fees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/07/09/educrat-union-seeks-300000-in-stimulus-legal-fees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/07/09/educrat-union-seeks-300000-in-stimulus-legal-fees/</link>
	<description>Politics, Sports and Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SCASA Grabs for a Slice of Stimulus Pie &#171; The Voice for School Choice</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/07/09/educrat-union-seeks-300000-in-stimulus-legal-fees/#comment-61079</link>
		<dc:creator>SCASA Grabs for a Slice of Stimulus Pie &#171; The Voice for School Choice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=25301#comment-61079</guid>
		<description>[...] Yesterday FITSNews broke the story on this latest SCASA money grab - [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yesterday FITSNews broke the story on this latest SCASA money grab &#8211; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BIN News Editorial Staff</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/07/09/educrat-union-seeks-300000-in-stimulus-legal-fees/#comment-61003</link>
		<dc:creator>BIN News Editorial Staff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=25301#comment-61003</guid>
		<description>And kudos to Kobayashi Maru! Great post! Thank goodness for the SCASA and others working in the best interests of all children in S.C. 

sic(k) willie and Howie&#039;s voucher clowns never miss a chance to take a cheap shot at public education. Attacking children; they&#039;re worse than the Borg. 

Howie&#039;s voucher clowns know vouchers are dead in SC. Doubledog dead now that voucher-clown-in-chief sanfraud is permanently in the political dog house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And kudos to Kobayashi Maru! Great post! Thank goodness for the SCASA and others working in the best interests of all children in S.C. </p>
<p>sic(k) willie and Howie&#8217;s voucher clowns never miss a chance to take a cheap shot at public education. Attacking children; they&#8217;re worse than the Borg. </p>
<p>Howie&#8217;s voucher clowns know vouchers are dead in SC. Doubledog dead now that voucher-clown-in-chief sanfraud is permanently in the political dog house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kobayashi Maru</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/07/09/educrat-union-seeks-300000-in-stimulus-legal-fees/#comment-60947</link>
		<dc:creator>Kobayashi Maru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=25301#comment-60947</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s see if I can get this straight: on the one hand, it&#039;s wrong for SCASA to use &quot;taxpayer money&quot; to fight the governor to bring $700 million in stimulus funds (taxpayer money) to our State?  On the other hand, it&#039;s OK for the governor to use clear taxpayer dollars to go to court to try and keep our state from pulling in stimulus funds that we&#039;re going to have to pay for anyway?

I&#039;d say it&#039;s a bargain to spend $150,000 (or even $300,000) for $700 million coming to our state, as opposed to the governor&#039;s failed idea of South Carolinian&#039;s tax dollars being used solely to pay for $700 million to other states.

Kudos to SCASA! Personally, I think the cost for this mess should come out of the governor&#039;s hide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see if I can get this straight: on the one hand, it&#8217;s wrong for SCASA to use &#8220;taxpayer money&#8221; to fight the governor to bring $700 million in stimulus funds (taxpayer money) to our State?  On the other hand, it&#8217;s OK for the governor to use clear taxpayer dollars to go to court to try and keep our state from pulling in stimulus funds that we&#8217;re going to have to pay for anyway?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s a bargain to spend $150,000 (or even $300,000) for $700 million coming to our state, as opposed to the governor&#8217;s failed idea of South Carolinian&#8217;s tax dollars being used solely to pay for $700 million to other states.</p>
<p>Kudos to SCASA! Personally, I think the cost for this mess should come out of the governor&#8217;s hide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thad Viers</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/07/09/educrat-union-seeks-300000-in-stimulus-legal-fees/#comment-60944</link>
		<dc:creator>Thad Viers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=25301#comment-60944</guid>
		<description>Shock!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shock!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toyota Kawaski</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/07/09/educrat-union-seeks-300000-in-stimulus-legal-fees/#comment-60928</link>
		<dc:creator>Toyota Kawaski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=25301#comment-60928</guid>
		<description>To bad they cant get money from Sanfraud</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To bad they cant get money from Sanfraud</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

