Comments on: Lloyd: Sanford Didn’t Misuse State Funds

By: SCHotline Staff

SCHotline Staff — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 19:48:53 +0000

South Carolinian’s Duped Again By SLED, McMaster? McClatchy: “Sanford’s trade mission to Argentina contradicted U.S. policy”

http://schotline.wordpress.com/2009/07/03/south-carolinians-duped-again-by-sled-mcmaster-mcclatchy-sanfords-trade-mission-to-argentina-contradicted-u-s-policy/

By: James the Foot Soldier

James the Foot Soldier — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:30:25 +0000

Scott – Gov. goes to Argentina and meets with Argentinian leaders and captains of industry down there (whatever industry that may be).

Trip is now legit.

Gov. spends time with the Dolly Lama while in Argentina. That doesn’t make the trip illegitimate – it just makes it smell really really bad.

By: liz

liz — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:50:30 +0000

Did anyone read Rolling Stone article on Goldman Sachs?? Matt T. said in that article that every market crash was instigated by Goldman Sachs.

Mark Sanford worked for Goldman Sachs in 1987.

Interestingly, the London AIG office opened that same year.

And that is the year that I have absolute PROOF of two Social Security accounts paying somewhere other than to the people they were supposed to be paying.

I’ll be available for questions and answers anytime anyone wants some.

By: randee

randee — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 01:28:13 +0000

Let’s face it–Sanford is a huge liability to the Reptards. Of couse the Dems want him to stick around for another 18 months, as it will pave the way for an almost certain Democrat goobernatorial victory.

By: PandaChris

PandaChris — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:49:06 +0000

Remember, this was not an OFFICIAL investigation….this means that Lloyd could make the rules up regarding the investigation and did not have to follow strict protocol as in a criminal investigation.

Sanford has already admitted and returned funds….and tell me, for the record, what jobs and/or business did we get from his trip to Argentina?

Guys, this is the real coverup..///a;; the posts, editorials, stories, etc. about the “true love affair” was just a lot of noise to take our eyes and minds off the misuse of funds.

By: madcock

madcock — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:42:09 +0000

Well, if Reggie is telling the truth, sounds like the state of SC owes King David several thousand dollars.

What a joke. If Reggie had any concern for his professional standards, he would have recused himself from this investigation because he was appointed by the LuvGuv, and asked for an independent arbiter to undertake the investigation.

If either party, Reggie or the Adulterer had the slightest concern that the mafia that calls itself the SC GOP, they would have asked for this indpendent investigation for the sake of their own reputations.

Unfortunatley, we live in one-party state, just like Cuba or China, with a compliant media that sits on incriminating e-mails for months, then breaks its neck to make sure Sanford knows they have proof of his adultery so he can change his story to fit the facts.

I would say God help us, but as you Repubs love to point out God is a Republican, so I guess we’re screwed there too.

By: Scott

Scott — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:25:53 +0000

While Lloyd is saying that Sanford didn’t misuse state funds, state funds were used to get him to Argentina….and if I remember correctly, the Commerce Department said that the Argentinian leg of the trip was added at the request of the Governor’s Office.

By: Eric

Eric — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:15:33 +0000

The Democrats are not pushing for an independent prosecutor for the Sanford mess because there is simply no need. The Republican Party is doing a fine job of immolating Sanford on their own! At best, Democrats would be accused of piling on to this slow motion train wreck. I suspect that Democrats are best served by having Sanford twist in the wind up through the 2010 campaign season.

By: jezebel

jezebel — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:14:53 +0000

People, the officials in SC are not Hollywood elite who expect security day and night. I know, I spent time there within the Columbia circle. You could ask his Chief of Staff and the SLED agent assigned to him but they aren’t going to reveal anything.

I have been thinking about two things. I read that Sanford was a follower of “The Family”. Can someone give me more insight into this fundamentalist group and what C Street might have meant in his growth? Also, everybody is applauding Jenny Sanford but she knew about this for at least 6 months (what was that letter she found? an email?) and pretended right along with Mark to go through that Cubby marriage conference in May. She waited until both school and the legislature was out before telling him to hit the road -which he did. She could have left at any time, and this sounds a little politically motivated to me.

Finally, what is this “book” Sanford said he was writing and needed time alone. Couldn’t he just go to his beach house, or even rent a hotel room in the state? Hate to say it now Markie, but unless that book is about you and your soul mate, nobody is going to be interested. I have to say I read a comment somewhere that was so cute, it said he was being all soul matie. Mark and Maria, sitting in a tree . . .

By: Adam

Adam — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:15:27 +0000

Are the Dems not out there calling for an independent investigator to be appointed because of Mr. Lloyd’s race or just because they are asleep at the wheel like always?