<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sources: Jilted Ex-Husband Leaked Sanford Emails</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/06/25/sources-jilted-ex-husband-leaked-sanford-emails/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/06/25/sources-jilted-ex-husband-leaked-sanford-emails/</link>
	<description>Politics, Sports and Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:35:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShameOnJakie</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/06/25/sources-jilted-ex-husband-leaked-sanford-emails/#comment-59045</link>
		<dc:creator>ShameOnJakie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=24336#comment-59045</guid>
		<description>The leak of these emails has the despicable stench of Porky Knotts all over it. Anyone with a tiny fragment of honor or class would have withheld those emails from the public so as to spare the boys the pain it will undoubtedly cause. When I think - who is it I know that has the LEAST amount of honor or class...the name Porky Knotts always comes to mind.

Knotts backs Bauer. Bauer pretends to take the high road and be concerned for Sanford and South Carolina. Knotts takes all the shots at Sanford (though I&#039;ve heard a few rumors of Knott&#039;s own dalliances).

Sanford has disappointed us all. If he steps down now, the RINOs in the Senate (McConnell &amp; Knotts especially) will bankrupt our granchildren and and spend this state in to oblivion in no time flat. 

If anyone needs to go, its Knotts &amp; McConnell. Just my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The leak of these emails has the despicable stench of Porky Knotts all over it. Anyone with a tiny fragment of honor or class would have withheld those emails from the public so as to spare the boys the pain it will undoubtedly cause. When I think &#8211; who is it I know that has the LEAST amount of honor or class&#8230;the name Porky Knotts always comes to mind.</p>
<p>Knotts backs Bauer. Bauer pretends to take the high road and be concerned for Sanford and South Carolina. Knotts takes all the shots at Sanford (though I&#8217;ve heard a few rumors of Knott&#8217;s own dalliances).</p>
<p>Sanford has disappointed us all. If he steps down now, the RINOs in the Senate (McConnell &amp; Knotts especially) will bankrupt our granchildren and and spend this state in to oblivion in no time flat. </p>
<p>If anyone needs to go, its Knotts &amp; McConnell. Just my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crooner</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/06/25/sources-jilted-ex-husband-leaked-sanford-emails/#comment-59025</link>
		<dc:creator>Crooner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=24336#comment-59025</guid>
		<description>One more time.  It goes like this: no pictures, no video, nothing in writing.  Deny, deny, deny.

Sheesh, what an idiot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more time.  It goes like this: no pictures, no video, nothing in writing.  Deny, deny, deny.</p>
<p>Sheesh, what an idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A_Network_Administrator</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/06/25/sources-jilted-ex-husband-leaked-sanford-emails/#comment-58970</link>
		<dc:creator>A_Network_Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=24336#comment-58970</guid>
		<description>Two assumptions are baseless here. 1) A network admin must be the leaker, and 2) All The State has to do is trace the IP. Poppycock to both of those.

1) It was a personal email account. Probably Gmail, Yahoo, or some web-based thing like that. Sanford probably had the &quot;remember password&quot; checked and so all one would have to do is gain momentary access to his computer, open gmail, forward the inbox, or set up an automatically forward rule and hope he doesn&#039;t notice. Easy breezy. A 10 year old can do it.

2) I doubt the emails were sent digitally to the State. Why would someone risk that. I think what&#039;s more likely is they were printed and snail mailed. If they were sent digitally, all it takes is going to the library and setting up a yahoo account from one of their computers.. or any other public computer for that matter.

So let&#039;s lay off the Government IT guys. They have enough to worry about blocking all the porn sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two assumptions are baseless here. 1) A network admin must be the leaker, and 2) All The State has to do is trace the IP. Poppycock to both of those.</p>
<p>1) It was a personal email account. Probably Gmail, Yahoo, or some web-based thing like that. Sanford probably had the &#8220;remember password&#8221; checked and so all one would have to do is gain momentary access to his computer, open gmail, forward the inbox, or set up an automatically forward rule and hope he doesn&#8217;t notice. Easy breezy. A 10 year old can do it.</p>
<p>2) I doubt the emails were sent digitally to the State. Why would someone risk that. I think what&#8217;s more likely is they were printed and snail mailed. If they were sent digitally, all it takes is going to the library and setting up a yahoo account from one of their computers.. or any other public computer for that matter.</p>
<p>So let&#8217;s lay off the Government IT guys. They have enough to worry about blocking all the porn sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Addie</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/06/25/sources-jilted-ex-husband-leaked-sanford-emails/#comment-58945</link>
		<dc:creator>Addie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=24336#comment-58945</guid>
		<description>Why this sight has not called for investigation. Why because both Mark Sanford and Tom Davis pay Will to do PR. That is why he has never reported on the Tom Davis affair that Tom had with a State News Paper reporter. Richard Todd reported on the affair on his radio show in Charleston Thursday. This is not Fox news it is not fair and balanced. It is very slanted depending on how much money you pay Will. Just look at all the press Nikki Haley gets. It is not due to her being a great politician in fact she has never passed one bill or reformed anything in SC. She just pays big $$$ to Will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why this sight has not called for investigation. Why because both Mark Sanford and Tom Davis pay Will to do PR. That is why he has never reported on the Tom Davis affair that Tom had with a State News Paper reporter. Richard Todd reported on the affair on his radio show in Charleston Thursday. This is not Fox news it is not fair and balanced. It is very slanted depending on how much money you pay Will. Just look at all the press Nikki Haley gets. It is not due to her being a great politician in fact she has never passed one bill or reformed anything in SC. She just pays big $$$ to Will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Hendrix</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/06/25/sources-jilted-ex-husband-leaked-sanford-emails/#comment-58942</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Hendrix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=24336#comment-58942</guid>
		<description>Flattering, I called you brain, not Brian. Maybe you can make it a nickname or supervillian title.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flattering, I called you brain, not Brian. Maybe you can make it a nickname or supervillian title.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Hendrix</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/06/25/sources-jilted-ex-husband-leaked-sanford-emails/#comment-58941</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Hendrix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=24336#comment-58941</guid>
		<description>Brain, yeah, that&#039;s amazing. I had not heard that and makes me wonder who would have done such a thing. Was anybody in his staff fired in December or January?

And Danix, it&#039;s no secret why women cheat more - they can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brain, yeah, that&#8217;s amazing. I had not heard that and makes me wonder who would have done such a thing. Was anybody in his staff fired in December or January?</p>
<p>And Danix, it&#8217;s no secret why women cheat more &#8211; they can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CyndiLue</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/06/25/sources-jilted-ex-husband-leaked-sanford-emails/#comment-58934</link>
		<dc:creator>CyndiLue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=24336#comment-58934</guid>
		<description>And maybe the mistress leaked it, hoping that once he got caught his wife would leave him, and she could have him all to herself....

Never trust the other woman :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And maybe the mistress leaked it, hoping that once he got caught his wife would leave him, and she could have him all to herself&#8230;.</p>
<p>Never trust the other woman :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/06/25/sources-jilted-ex-husband-leaked-sanford-emails/#comment-58931</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=24336#comment-58931</guid>
		<description>Pat,
Only if you have the entire email, if all you have is a screenshot or print out, there is no way to trace it to an IP. I am in IT, so I understand how all that works.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090625/ap_on_re_us/us_sc_governor_e_mails_1

&quot;In an interview on CNN&#039;s &quot;Larry King Live,&quot; State reporter John O&#039;Connor said the newspaper was sent the messages from the governor&#039;s personal e-mail account by an anonymous person.&quot;

HE said it came from the Governor&#039;s personal account, not the womans. And if he accessed his personal account from his state computer, it is possible that someone could have see it. There are ways administrators can take screen shots of computers every 30 seconds or whatever time frame they won&#039;t. This can easily be done without you knowing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat,<br />
Only if you have the entire email, if all you have is a screenshot or print out, there is no way to trace it to an IP. I am in IT, so I understand how all that works.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090625/ap_on_re_us/us_sc_governor_e_mails_1" rel="nofollow">http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090625/ap_on_re_us/us_sc_governor_e_mails_1</a></p>
<p>&#8220;In an interview on CNN&#8217;s &#8220;Larry King Live,&#8221; State reporter John O&#8217;Connor said the newspaper was sent the messages from the governor&#8217;s personal e-mail account by an anonymous person.&#8221;</p>
<p>HE said it came from the Governor&#8217;s personal account, not the womans. And if he accessed his personal account from his state computer, it is possible that someone could have see it. There are ways administrators can take screen shots of computers every 30 seconds or whatever time frame they won&#8217;t. This can easily be done without you knowing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danix803</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/06/25/sources-jilted-ex-husband-leaked-sanford-emails/#comment-58929</link>
		<dc:creator>danix803</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=24336#comment-58929</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a shame that the media and everyone else always focuses on the man in the equation when women cheat much, much more often. Female logic is completely different in these equations. Men consider sex outside of a permenant relationship as cheating. However, women generally do NOT use that definition. To them, someone is always making them do something. When they do it, it&#039;s a man&#039;s fault for NOT supporting them in some fashion that they desire. For instance, he didn&#039;t give her enough money, didn&#039;t listen whine, grip, complain, moan about some trivial garbage that no one really cares about (http://ezinearticles.com/?The-Psychological-Reasons-Women-Cheat-More-than-Men&amp;id=738666). You can also google the FACT that women cheat more than men and get nearly 19 million sites that support this FACTual conclusion. Bill Clinton (slick willy) used female logic to get out the Monica problem. Exactly what is the definition of sex??? The only important definition is GOD&#039;s definition. If you think for a split second that GOD will put HIS stamp of approval on a woman&#039;s affair, and not define it as adultery, simply because her man couldn&#039;t/didn&#039;t/wouldn&#039;t give her money for smokes or listen to her spew worthless emotional trash for more than 1 minute then I believe UR gonna&#039; be hurtin&#039; and sunscreen number 1 trillion is not going to keep you from gettin&#039; burnt...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a shame that the media and everyone else always focuses on the man in the equation when women cheat much, much more often. Female logic is completely different in these equations. Men consider sex outside of a permenant relationship as cheating. However, women generally do NOT use that definition. To them, someone is always making them do something. When they do it, it&#8217;s a man&#8217;s fault for NOT supporting them in some fashion that they desire. For instance, he didn&#8217;t give her enough money, didn&#8217;t listen whine, grip, complain, moan about some trivial garbage that no one really cares about (<a href="http://ezinearticles.com/?The-Psychological-Reasons-Women-Cheat-More-than-Men&#038;id=738666" rel="nofollow">http://ezinearticles.com/?The-Psychological-Reasons-Women-Cheat-More-than-Men&#038;id=738666</a>). You can also google the FACT that women cheat more than men and get nearly 19 million sites that support this FACTual conclusion. Bill Clinton (slick willy) used female logic to get out the Monica problem. Exactly what is the definition of sex??? The only important definition is GOD&#8217;s definition. If you think for a split second that GOD will put HIS stamp of approval on a woman&#8217;s affair, and not define it as adultery, simply because her man couldn&#8217;t/didn&#8217;t/wouldn&#8217;t give her money for smokes or listen to her spew worthless emotional trash for more than 1 minute then I believe UR gonna&#8217; be hurtin&#8217; and sunscreen number 1 trillion is not going to keep you from gettin&#8217; burnt&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Hendrix</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/06/25/sources-jilted-ex-husband-leaked-sanford-emails/#comment-58921</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Hendrix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=24336#comment-58921</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t need the FBI to figure out what IP address it came from. A twelve year old boy could do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t need the FBI to figure out what IP address it came from. A twelve year old boy could do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

