“Reaganesque?”
South Carolina’s Fourth Congressional District is known for being home to the most fiscally and socially conservative voters in the state. It’s also home to a politically-active business community that relishes its role of playing kingmaker.
Sadly, with only a exceptions, that conservative voting bloc and cabal of alleged “pro-business” power elites hasn’t produced much in the way of fiscally conservative lawmakers.
Take S.C. Senator David Thomas, who last week announced that he was running for the Fourth Congressional Seat currently held by U.S. Rep. Bob Inglis.
“I’ll be a Reaganesque voice that you can be proud of,” Thomas said in announcing his bid.
Really? “Reaganesque?”
Remember, this is the same guy who publicly pledged just months ago to “roll up his sleeves” and support Gov. Mark Sanford during the recently-concluded “stimulus” fight – only to flip-flop and vote against the governor (and more importantly, against the taxpayers) at every turn in the “stimulus” debate.
He’s also the guy who basically turned over control of his banking committee to the most liberal special interest group in South Carolina.
Is that “Reaganesque?”
Of course not.
David Thomas is a big government RINOcrat who has faithfully voted with the liberal wing of the GOP for years.
Far from being the “conservative leader” he claims to be, the truth is he’s nothing but a “fluffer” for powerful Senate President Glenn McConnell and Finance Chairman Hugh Leatherman, the two primary architects of South Carolina’s big-spending, zero accountability approach to government. As recently as two weeks ago, Thomas was on the floor of the S.C. Senate doing what he always does – voting in lockstep with our state’s RINOcrat majority.
For his dutiful subservience, Thomas has received certain table scraps of leftover pork from McConnell and Leatherman – yet taxpayers have been left with rapidly escalating unemployment, stagnant income levels, a dysfunctional government and the worst public schools in America.
Is any of that “Reaganesque?”
Not on your life.
Obviously we have no love for U.S. Rep. Bob Inglis – who was one of the original “Republican” bailout supporters – but in the race to replace his consistent caving with the voice of a real taxpayer advocate, we would encourage Greenville voters to look elsewhere.
We’d also encourage them to stop listening to their so-called “business community,” which is clearly not looking out for its own best interests – not those of the taxpayers.
One of the staunchest conservative districts in America should have a staunch conservative – like U.S. Sen. Jim DeMint – representing it, not another RINO.






Comments
By CNSYD on June 8th, 2009 at 11:13 am
I am still waiting for someone to tell me what significant legislation DeMint has authored and it has passed in the Senate. Being a voice crying in the wilderness accomplishes nothing.
By Gillon on June 8th, 2009 at 11:33 am
You decry Senator David Thomas’ use of the term “Reaganesque” and state that because of Thomas and his like-minded fellow Republican state senators, SC taxpayers “have been left with rapidly escalating unemployment, stagnant income levels, and a dysfunctional government.” And then you pose the question, “Is any of that Reaganesque?”
Well no, not unless you include the Recession of 1981-82 when unemployment was higher than it is now. Not unless you include the fact that under the Reagan Administration the only class whose incomes did not stagnate were the wealthy. And not unless you consider dysfunctional government not to include events like the Savings and Loan Crisis and the Iran-Contra Affair.
Be careful what you wish for.
By Fourrth District Resident on June 8th, 2009 at 11:34 am
Senator Thomas’s voting record on fiscal issues speaks for itself. He is likeable and socially conservative, but he’s clearly a big spender. Several of the declared candidates for the Fourth District seat show promise on the spending front. Bob Inglis needs to be replaced, but not by David Thomas.
By Fourrth District Resident on June 8th, 2009 at 11:34 am
And where’d you get that picture of Greenville? The EPA?
By Recovering Lobbyist on June 8th, 2009 at 1:24 pm
Have you met the so-called conservative business leaders in Greenville? The voters may be red-meat conservatives, but the business elite in Greenville are anything but conservative. A generalization, I know, but a statement that I think is sound given the candidates our business elite put forward and gets elected from our part of the world. Our legislators may be more conservative than the low country crowd, but that is not saying much.
By HIPAA Violator on June 8th, 2009 at 3:47 pm
7th Circuit Solicitor Trey Gowdy is also running for this seat and will be getting my vote.
By Matt on June 8th, 2009 at 4:41 pm
David Thomas might not be Reagan-esque, but he stands head-and-shoulders in the “real Republican” department over Inglis. Trey Gowdy is also running but still needs to develop an issue portfolio and political identity. Andrew Smart is a fairly entrepreneurial businessman running who will be the fourth major candidate in this race. Whether it’s Thomas, Gowdy or Smart, any of them would be an automatic improvement over the entrenched moderate incumbent representing one of the most conservative districts in the US.
By James the Foot Soldier on June 8th, 2009 at 10:40 pm
Gillon – The recession of 1981-1982 – the one that Jimmy (my home-building skills suck) Carter left as a “Welome to the Oval Office Present” for President Reagan?
Ask the millions of folks in Eastern Europe who are now free from the Russian claw what Reaganesue means….
PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH
By lou on June 9th, 2009 at 8:03 am
Reagan didn’t go around hurting people. He didn’t cheat his constituents, not on the record anyway.
Fiscally conservative now means steal from the people.
By Elmo on June 9th, 2009 at 8:46 am
It should be hunting season for RINO’s.
Someone asked what significant legislation Demint has authored and passed through the Senate.
This question shows how people foolishly believe that passing more laws somehow makes someone a better Senator.
We need Senators who vote against big spending bills- like the hideous bank bailout bill. Those kind of tough taxpayer friendly decisions take balls and courage. We can not grow more government – we can not afford what we have now.
Anyone who supported the bank bailout bill in Congress needs to get voted out of Washington ASAP.
Inglis-What did the banks do with all OUR money you gave them? Do you have a clue? I didn’t think so.