<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Federal Judge Had Apparent Conflict With Sanford</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/06/01/federal-judge-had-apparent-conflict-with-sanford/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/06/01/federal-judge-had-apparent-conflict-with-sanford/</link>
	<description>Unfair ... Imbalanced</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:09:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Silence Dogood</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/06/01/federal-judge-had-apparent-conflict-with-sanford/comment-page-1/#comment-56357</link>
		<dc:creator>Silence Dogood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 05:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=22472#comment-56357</guid>
		<description>I appreciate &quot;hmmmm&#039;s&quot; comments and concurr, but I still doubt what you say, I am glad I &quot;proved a response&quot; though.  I will post my thought on your updated link.  Shane Massey only rasied a little under $35,000 in the ENTIRE month of Sept. according to his filings with the state, are you seriously contributing all of that to the governor&#039;s fund raiser?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate &#8220;hmmmm&#8217;s&#8221; comments and concurr, but I still doubt what you say, I am glad I &#8220;proved a response&#8221; though.  I will post my thought on your updated link.  Shane Massey only rasied a little under $35,000 in the ENTIRE month of Sept. according to his filings with the state, are you seriously contributing all of that to the governor&#8217;s fund raiser?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: That's Politics</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/06/01/federal-judge-had-apparent-conflict-with-sanford/comment-page-1/#comment-56318</link>
		<dc:creator>That's Politics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 22:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=22472#comment-56318</guid>
		<description>First of all, Joe Anderson is a stand up, good guy.

But for arguments sake, say he was ethically challenged. Sanford took a risk when he supported Massey, and maybe it came back to bite him in the ass. He should have known better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, Joe Anderson is a stand up, good guy.</p>
<p>But for arguments sake, say he was ethically challenged. Sanford took a risk when he supported Massey, and maybe it came back to bite him in the ass. He should have known better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fitsnews</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/06/01/federal-judge-had-apparent-conflict-with-sanford/comment-page-1/#comment-56308</link>
		<dc:creator>fitsnews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=22472#comment-56308</guid>
		<description>FYI to all ...

http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/06/02/in-case-anybody-still-cares/

... now you haters can smooch our roundness, Eminem-style.

&quot;Stench of imagination?&quot; &quot;Fabrication?&quot; &quot;Sanford did not raise one dam(n) dime?&quot;

Read it and weep, bitches. 

Oh, and one other thing, it&#039;s friggin&#039; amazing how much &quot;integrity&quot; a bunch of status quo sycophants will assign to somebody who just dumped $740 million into their laps. 

-FITS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI to all &#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/06/02/in-case-anybody-still-cares/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/06/02/in-case-anybody-still-cares/</a></p>
<p>&#8230; now you haters can smooch our roundness, Eminem-style.</p>
<p>&#8220;Stench of imagination?&#8221; &#8220;Fabrication?&#8221; &#8220;Sanford did not raise one dam(n) dime?&#8221;</p>
<p>Read it and weep, bitches. </p>
<p>Oh, and one other thing, it&#8217;s friggin&#8217; amazing how much &#8220;integrity&#8221; a bunch of status quo sycophants will assign to somebody who just dumped $740 million into their laps. </p>
<p>-FITS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Time to Call</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/06/01/federal-judge-had-apparent-conflict-with-sanford/comment-page-1/#comment-56307</link>
		<dc:creator>Time to Call</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=22472#comment-56307</guid>
		<description>This is the biggest stretch of the imagination and greatest fabrication you have put in this site.  And I seriously doubt that Mark was responsible for the $30k...as a sponsor, I am sure he lent his name and nothing else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the biggest stretch of the imagination and greatest fabrication you have put in this site.  And I seriously doubt that Mark was responsible for the $30k&#8230;as a sponsor, I am sure he lent his name and nothing else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zeke</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/06/01/federal-judge-had-apparent-conflict-with-sanford/comment-page-1/#comment-56305</link>
		<dc:creator>Zeke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=22472#comment-56305</guid>
		<description>fus (fromupstate):  Notice you commented on Judge Anderson&#039;s reputation for high ethical standards and judicial integrity but omitted your view on the Queen&#039;s. Hmmm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fus (fromupstate):  Notice you commented on Judge Anderson&#8217;s reputation for high ethical standards and judicial integrity but omitted your view on the Queen&#8217;s. Hmmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fromupstate</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/06/01/federal-judge-had-apparent-conflict-with-sanford/comment-page-1/#comment-56293</link>
		<dc:creator>fromupstate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=22472#comment-56293</guid>
		<description>Nice try FITS.  I usually see you as credible for digging the scoop/dirt on folks but you missed this one by a mile.

If the world has 6 degrees of separation, the State of South Carolina has 2 degrees.  Likewise, the legal community and law making community has about 1 degree of separation (just like every other state).  If you think that is unethical and immoral, then start a PAC to help put high school drop outs into state office and federal benches (good luck with that one).

With the criteria you believe should be required, every federal judge in the state would have to recuse him or herself from this case.  Guess what.... they all know Chief Justice Toal.

Judge Anderson&#039;s judicial integrity is as strong as any other state or federal judge in SC.  

Judge Anderson served in the legislature with Arthur Ravenel, that didn&#039;t stop him from sending Thomas Ravenel to prison.  He was friends with President Holderman at USC, that didn&#039;t&#039; stop him from sending him to prison as well.  Federal judges have former colleagues and classmates that try cases in front of them every day.  You guys are either out of tune with the legal process, got some bad information or just trying to stir the pot because that&#039;s what gets hits on your website.  I would have expected something like this from &quot;La Socialista&quot;, but not FITS.  Perhaps I should adjust my expectations.

p.s.-  Democrat? really????  appointed by Ronald Reagan to the Federal bench......  A southern democrat in the early 1980s and a &quot;Democrat&quot; are two very different things.   Come on FITS......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice try FITS.  I usually see you as credible for digging the scoop/dirt on folks but you missed this one by a mile.</p>
<p>If the world has 6 degrees of separation, the State of South Carolina has 2 degrees.  Likewise, the legal community and law making community has about 1 degree of separation (just like every other state).  If you think that is unethical and immoral, then start a PAC to help put high school drop outs into state office and federal benches (good luck with that one).</p>
<p>With the criteria you believe should be required, every federal judge in the state would have to recuse him or herself from this case.  Guess what&#8230;. they all know Chief Justice Toal.</p>
<p>Judge Anderson&#8217;s judicial integrity is as strong as any other state or federal judge in SC.  </p>
<p>Judge Anderson served in the legislature with Arthur Ravenel, that didn&#8217;t stop him from sending Thomas Ravenel to prison.  He was friends with President Holderman at USC, that didn&#8217;t&#8217; stop him from sending him to prison as well.  Federal judges have former colleagues and classmates that try cases in front of them every day.  You guys are either out of tune with the legal process, got some bad information or just trying to stir the pot because that&#8217;s what gets hits on your website.  I would have expected something like this from &#8220;La Socialista&#8221;, but not FITS.  Perhaps I should adjust my expectations.</p>
<p>p.s.-  Democrat? really????  appointed by Ronald Reagan to the Federal bench&#8230;&#8230;  A southern democrat in the early 1980s and a &#8220;Democrat&#8221; are two very different things.   Come on FITS&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hmmmm....</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/06/01/federal-judge-had-apparent-conflict-with-sanford/comment-page-1/#comment-56283</link>
		<dc:creator>Hmmmm....</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 18:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=22472#comment-56283</guid>
		<description>FITS, thank you for that, seriously.

What was the date of the fundraiser at Greg Ryberg&#039;s house which included the gov. I will be happy to check as well - nontheless, I doubt that Judge Anderson did that.

P.S. please don&#039;t include as any part of that $50,000 that Massey loaned to his own campaign, itis a common practice and frankly I doubt any of THAT was inspired by the governor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FITS, thank you for that, seriously.</p>
<p>What was the date of the fundraiser at Greg Ryberg&#8217;s house which included the gov. I will be happy to check as well &#8211; nontheless, I doubt that Judge Anderson did that.</p>
<p>P.S. please don&#8217;t include as any part of that $50,000 that Massey loaned to his own campaign, itis a common practice and frankly I doubt any of THAT was inspired by the governor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fitsnews</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/06/01/federal-judge-had-apparent-conflict-with-sanford/comment-page-1/#comment-56259</link>
		<dc:creator>fitsnews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 14:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=22472#comment-56259</guid>
		<description>&quot;YDGTFM,&quot;

We are about to get our Sanford rip on for his foolhardy handling of this situation. Patience, grasshopper. In the meantime, why are you so angry? Your team won, dude. Your bureaucrat buddies will seriously be rolling around in that money in no time.

&quot;Hmmmmm,&quot;

Actually, it looks like the event for Shane Massey featuring Gov. Mark Sanford (which was held at Greg Ryberg&#039;s palatial Sullivans Island SC home) raised $35,000, not $30,000 as we previously reported. We&#039;re cross-tabbing the contributions/ contribution dates on the State Ethics Commission website right now to make sure.

&quot;Laurin,&quot;

Wait ... that really is your name. Sorry for the quotation marks. Girlfriend, please. You know Sic Willie better than that. The only thing he &quot;grasps&quot; for is luscious lady lumps.

-FITS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;YDGTFM,&#8221;</p>
<p>We are about to get our Sanford rip on for his foolhardy handling of this situation. Patience, grasshopper. In the meantime, why are you so angry? Your team won, dude. Your bureaucrat buddies will seriously be rolling around in that money in no time.</p>
<p>&#8220;Hmmmmm,&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually, it looks like the event for Shane Massey featuring Gov. Mark Sanford (which was held at Greg Ryberg&#8217;s palatial Sullivans Island SC home) raised $35,000, not $30,000 as we previously reported. We&#8217;re cross-tabbing the contributions/ contribution dates on the State Ethics Commission website right now to make sure.</p>
<p>&#8220;Laurin,&#8221;</p>
<p>Wait &#8230; that really is your name. Sorry for the quotation marks. Girlfriend, please. You know Sic Willie better than that. The only thing he &#8220;grasps&#8221; for is luscious lady lumps.</p>
<p>-FITS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurin</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/06/01/federal-judge-had-apparent-conflict-with-sanford/comment-page-1/#comment-56257</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 14:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=22472#comment-56257</guid>
		<description>This post sure is grasping for a silver bullet, but you&#039;re ignoring the most obvious point:  the heart of the controversy in this matter concerns the balance of power in South Carolina&#039;s governmental structure as it&#039;s laid out by the South Carolina constitution.  That kind of case belongs in state court -- not federal court.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post sure is grasping for a silver bullet, but you&#8217;re ignoring the most obvious point:  the heart of the controversy in this matter concerns the balance of power in South Carolina&#8217;s governmental structure as it&#8217;s laid out by the South Carolina constitution.  That kind of case belongs in state court &#8212; not federal court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hmmmm....</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/06/01/federal-judge-had-apparent-conflict-with-sanford/comment-page-1/#comment-56255</link>
		<dc:creator>Hmmmm....</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 14:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=22472#comment-56255</guid>
		<description>FITS you noted that you were &quot;just throwing out facts,&quot; so if it is a fact that Sanford raised $30,000.00 or more for Massey, where can we check on that???  

This was the crux of your entire argument.  Oh, my bad, when you said you were just &quot;throwing out the facts&quot; you meant actually throwing them away as in the garbage, and not as in slang for actually putting the facts out there for people to see.  Got it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FITS you noted that you were &#8220;just throwing out facts,&#8221; so if it is a fact that Sanford raised $30,000.00 or more for Massey, where can we check on that???  </p>
<p>This was the crux of your entire argument.  Oh, my bad, when you said you were just &#8220;throwing out the facts&#8221; you meant actually throwing them away as in the garbage, and not as in slang for actually putting the facts out there for people to see.  Got it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
