“Broadbandcrats” Push WiMax Deal for South Carolina

By fitsnews • on May 26, 2009
Comment Print

broadband

Last year, Palmetto State Lawmakers passed a bill creating the awkwardly named “South Carolina Educational Broadband Service Commission” (or “SCEBSC” to its close friends).

The seven political appointees who comprise this commission were told to structure an auction and review lease proposals for unused Education Broadband Service (EBS) broadcast licenses currently held by South Carolina’s state-run media conglomerate, ETV.

Any of this sounding familiar?

These are the very licenses that a fiefdom-building former head of SC ETV tried to convert into some quick cash … on the sly of course.

They also form the basis of yet another private sector trampling in South Carolina, where a cadre of “Republican” lawmakers want to put government in charge of picking winners and losers in the marketplace.

Anyway, today the commission announced completion of the auction and the selection of a joint proposal from Washington State-based Clearwire and Virginia based Digital Bridge Communications (DBC) as their recommendation.

If approved, Clearwire would serve roughly 70% of the licenses and DBC the other 30%, with both companies planning to roll out a commercial WiMax service.

A marginal amount of bandwidth will be retained by the State to meet some absurd FCC requirements.

Not surprisingly, there are also some bells and whistles thrown in for South Carolina’s research Universities, but based on the budget crunch and the ongoing hydrogen fuel fiasco, these minor provisions seem unlikely to mature into the sort of massive taxpayer slush fund that “R&D” projects in South Carolina are usually created to be.

The value of the bid – $135 million over 30 years with another $7 million upfront for a 95% sublease – is more than double the $60 million or so that was quietly offered by Clearwire directly to ETV before the economic downturn.

Of course, the best news of all is what the Commission didn’t do.

It didn’t just handover the licenses to the slew of opportunist “activists,” consultants and contractors who planned on using “free” Internet to line their personal and corporate pockets. Never mind that this would have stifled competition, sent the incumbent providers fleeing, and virtually ensured that no new fiber infrastructure was ever laid in the state again.

Naturally the far-left “free wireless will save us all” lobby will squawk at the bid proposal, and try to bully the Joint Bond Review Committee and Budget and Control Panel into foregoing the plan.

Let’s hope they don’t succeed.

Based on the questionable service/ efficiency that state and local government are providing through their monopoly control of K-12 public education, the ports, roads and bridges, etc. … we’re hoping lawmakers won’t also attempt to gamble public money on socialized Internet.

Unfortunately, depending on unreleased language in the bid allowing a “buy-back,” they might still be able to use a third of the spectrum in the so-called “mid-band” of the EBS licenses to try and do just that.

We’ll have to see … in the meantime, count on FITS to keep you connected with everything that’s happening with the deal.

Match.com

Comments

By flipnut on May 26th, 2009 at 7:35 pm

Any thing could be better than Clearwire. They are linked up with Time Warner cable and have no incentive to be part of the transition away from Cable TV.

But, when has the SC PSC ever liked competition for phone and internet access? Pretty soon the entire state will be like York County, we get to choose between Comporium or Comporium, for phone, internet, and cable TV.

By RichardOn on May 26th, 2009 at 7:47 pm

Interesting site, but much advertisments on him. Shall read as subscription, rss.

By Liberty for me on May 26th, 2009 at 10:10 pm

Privatize…privatize…privatize..Government should only do what it is meant to do.Keep the peace and maintain law.Take the power and money away from these morons and give it back to us to have a real economy and efficent innovation.Get them out of any kind of business and the school system….give us back the free lives we are supposed to have.

By StupidShouldHurtMore (SSHM) on May 27th, 2009 at 1:46 pm

@Liberty For Me,

I’m not so sure. There are a few other facets of government that I do like. Maybe you have heard of them:

CDC … clearly does not fall into peace or law enforcement.

FDA … clearly does not fall into peace or law enforcement.

Government is more that what is explicit in the Constitution. Thank goodness we have the ability to evolve or adapt over time.

- SSHM

By Liberty for me on May 27th, 2009 at 5:24 pm

Your stupid sure dosent hurt enough..We dont need them!
We dont need to evolve into socialism.Freedom can stand alone

By StupidShouldHurtMore (SSHM) on May 28th, 2009 at 9:06 am

@Liberty For Me,

Pass me the Extra Strength Tylenol. Oh wait … check to make sure it’s sealed and free of cyanide. Oh wait … did we just discover a need for the FDA?

Yeah . . .

Oh … the US Post Office … clearly does not fall into peace or law enforcement. The list goes on and on.

- SSHM

By Lulz on May 28th, 2009 at 11:10 am

Only reason why the higher-service and better-value FedEx and UPS have not totally pushed USPS out of business is because the feds are enforcing a government monopoly on first class mail

As for the FDA – the ISO system shows that you can have third party “regulation” and quality assurance without the wasteful graft and economic redistribution of government “oversight”

Finally, the WiMax deal; adding another market competitor to the cable/phone du-opoloy is better than setting up state NPR/PBS as an ISP any day

By mark g on May 28th, 2009 at 6:04 pm

The terms are almost exactly what ETV proposed nearly four years ago, in open hearings. It’s easy to find online. There was never a $60 million proposal– it never went out to bid, because the telcom lobbyists delayed it.

How is this private sector trampling? This is the exact same method all cell phone and wireless services are made possible– government auctions of spectrum to telecommunications bidders.

I don’t know if it’s comical or sad the way everything gets so twisted in this state.

By Not Quite on May 28th, 2009 at 9:30 pm

Mark, no, the incumbent providers have not been leased EBS (educational Spectrum) licenses from the State, instead they bought spectrum from federal auction. Sub-leasing the spectrum, answering to both State and federal regualtors, and having educational services subsidize their business plan make this very different for Clearwire and DBC

By mark g on May 29th, 2009 at 8:20 pm

The point is, all spectrum is regulated by the government. AT&T, Sprint, Clearwire– they must all obtain spectrum for wireless services through an auction or lease of some kind. Usually it’s through FCC auctions, in this case it’s the state auctioning spectrum under FCC guidelines. And I don’t see any educational subsidy– Clearwire will build and operate its own network. So there is nothing here that resembles “private sector trampling.”

And since it must all be conducted according to FCC and state rules, there is no opportunity for anything to happen “on the sly.”
It took about three years too long, but this is actually a good thing for the state and for consumers. Why is it so difficult for people to admit that something good could happen in this state ever once in a while?

Leave a Comment