Comments on: Sanford’s Lawsuit Hits Federal Court

By: Waldo

Waldo — Fri, 22 May 2009 16:55:22 +0000

Having read the Complaint, I don’t believe Sanford has sufficiently created federal jurisdiction under the supremacy clause. The state appropriations bill is not at conflict with the supremacy clause. Rather, it does encroach on the independence of the executive branch. Seems to me the Governor is attempting to create a federal issue so his seperation of powers argument can slide in to federal court on supplemental jurisdiction.

My .02.

By: Bin There

Bin There — Fri, 22 May 2009 12:45:55 +0000

This is clearly a states rights issue. Marky Mark and the Funky Bunch over at the statehouse knows they will get their butts whipped in state court, so we have to go through his rejection at the federal level first before we can get down to business. You are going down Marky Mark.

By: Toyota Kawaski

Toyota Kawaski — Fri, 22 May 2009 12:20:58 +0000

please go into the sunset with the Senator from Wisconsin

By: liz

liz — Fri, 22 May 2009 11:34:42 +0000

stupid is as stupid does

By: me

me — Fri, 22 May 2009 02:28:05 +0000

you got my support sanford, whip those corrupt mofos in the ass please.

By: GGIH

GGIH — Thu, 21 May 2009 17:48:06 +0000

God, please make this blowhard go away.

By: Fashizzle

Fashizzle — Thu, 21 May 2009 17:43:16 +0000

The stimulus bill is a federal law. Therefore the decision must be made in federal court. The wind blowing must be the draft between your ears.

By: weighing in

weighing in — Thu, 21 May 2009 16:57:00 +0000

now let me get this straight, the governor and those Senators who have been pushing the 10th amendment issue are now asking the Federal Court to interject in a state issue? Oh how the wind blows….