Mega dittos friend. Vote changing should be strictly against the rules in both houses. I can understand in the “people’s house” where C. Chellis was the chairman of the rules committee which fostered the “anthing goes” environment or “no harm no foul” scenario. In an age where the “progressive thought” is that there “are no absolutes”, I suppose that we shouldn’t be surprised when our governmnent becomes a reflection of “societal norms”. Sad but true. So in the “peoples house” led by Rino B. Harrell, it’s understandable, but in the SC Senate where General McConnell and Andre Bauer are in charge, THIS IS EXTREMELY SHOCKING NEWS!! The deliberative SC Senate should certainly enforce a rule that allows for no vote changing. Understandably there may be occasions where a senator would request to add possibly a statement offering his or her rationale for voting a certain way and do so with the consent of the Senate body. I think that generally speaking this does not foster the peoples’ trust of their state government to say the least!