Harrell’s Hydrogen Dreams Evaporating
S.C. House Speaker Bobby Harrell has staked his political reputation – and hundreds of millions of S.C. taxpayer dollars – on hydrogen fuel cell research.
Along with Columbia Mayor Bob Coble and University of South Carolina President Harris Pastides, Harrell has been the prime pusher of this so-called “knowledge-based economy of the future,” an “economic engine” that was supposed to bring thousands of jobs and millions of dollars in capital investment to our state.
In fact, as recently as five weeks ago Harrell boasted that “in the race to develop hydrogen into our nation’s next viable energy source, South Carolina has been a leader every step of the way.”
Well yesterday, that mantle was dealt a huge blow.
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) cut off funding for hydrogen fuel cell research, concluding that the technology will not be practical over the next 10 to 20 years.
Specifically, DOE has concluded that the hydrogen-powered cars and fueling stations – two of which were opened in South Carolina this year – are far too costly given their lack of utility.
They’re right.
South Carolina currently has only two hydrogen-powered vehicles – and both of them were built with government funding, one to the tune of $1.4 million.
That’s one hydrogen car per filling station.
Of course, the PR spin coming from the state’s political establishment is that most of our tax money has gone toward “stationary” fuel cell research, but is that really true?
And has any of it produced private investment or jobs for our state?
We know that $1.5 million was shelled out to build the Columbia hydrogen fueling station, and that every penny of that was allocated by S.C. leaders.
In fact, $1.2 million of the funding came directly from state or local sources.
We also know that over $140 million has also been spent on a nearly-vacant research campus that has failed to attract private investment and has instead relied almost exclusively on government funding.
At the center of the failed “Innovista” project’s efforts? Yup, hydrogen fuel cell research.
The state has also pumped tens of millions of dollars into tax credits and “endowed chairs” at its top research universities, with much of that investment going to hydrogen fuel cell projects.
A full accounting of S.C. taxpayers’ investment in “hydrogen fuel cell research” is not yet available, but critics were already beginning to question the expenditures – to say nothing of the fact that this is yet another example of government trying to pick winners and losers in the marketplace.
Just two days ago, prior to the Energy Department’s decision, S.C. Policy Council analyst Kevin Dietrich penned an oped that directly challenged Harrell, Coble and Pastides’ plans.
“Expensive hydrogen vehicles offer little appeal for consumers, particularly when the fuel isn’t available at a reasonable cost, and the private sector has so far been unwilling to invest billions of dollars in hydrogen when there is no evidence that it will ever be a viable energy source,” Dietrich wrote. “There is neither demand nor supply for the hydrogen fuel economy, and the government cannot artificially create either. Yet despite the troubled economy and clear lack of demand, the state Senate put more than $775,000 for hydrogen research at the University of South Carolina in its version of the budget.”
Remember, Speaker Harrell and Senate Finance Chairman Hugh Leatherman are the same politicians who recently told us that thousands of school teachers would have to be fired and thousands of inmates would have to be released into our neighborhoods – yet they obviously had enough to continue gambling on this technology.
Given the extent of their investment in the hydrogen pipe dream, we expect considerable push back from Harrell, Coble and Pastides as they attempt to justify their ongoing expenditures.
Specifically, expect them to reference a $12.5 million grant that USC received for hydrogen research last week.
But again, that’s taxpayer money.
Where’s the private sector investment that was supposed to come to our state as a result of all this public money being spent?
And more importantly, where are all those jobs Harrell promised?






Comments
By Hal on May 9th, 2009 at 11:45 am
I am so disappointed in Bobby H. I thought he would do a good job, but he has shown himself to be an old fashion pol…just a hack trading favors and spending our money.
Too bad.
By Timbo on May 9th, 2009 at 6:42 pm
I honestly believe that Bobby Harrell has the state’s best interest in mind… but for some odd reason, none of his ideas come to fruition. I really don’t understand it because he is sincere in his efforts, but homeboy just can’t make it happen.
By lou on May 10th, 2009 at 7:12 am
Ain’t it great, all the leadership and talent available at the Statehouse.
Where do these people come from and why won’t they relinquish the jobs that they hold? They have screwed up the world now. Time to go.
By Harrell has lost his way on May 10th, 2009 at 8:18 am
Does anyone in their right mind think the government of South Carolina can really have any impact on shaping how tomorrow’s vehicles will operate?
Bobby Harrell should be ashamed of himself for wasting our money and for pretending to be a fiscal conservative.
If we give our universities any grants at all( and we shouldn’t) , make it a grant to send college students into our elementary schools to help our younger children learn to read and write.
By Really! on May 10th, 2009 at 1:16 pm
Only in SC would we have a RINO like Bobby Harrell willing to spend hundreds of millions of our taxes on a wasteful government program that even big-government Barack won’t fund.
Seriously, it takes a lot for a politician to want to blow more of our children’s money money than Obama does. Nancy Pelosi and Bobby Harrell seem to make that short list.
Must be something in the bottled water they give to Speakers. I’m guessing it won’t be long before Bobby also throws a rant about not getting a plush military jet for his Charleston to Columbia commute.
By Fashizzle on May 10th, 2009 at 2:26 pm
SC Taxpayers have poured more than $40 million into hydrogen. Now that Harrell’s “pillars and pyramids” economy is crumbling around him let’s hope lawmakers learn a lesson about what happens when government intrudes in the private sector. Sadly, I doubt it.
Keep on them Will. These bums got in front of every camera they could when this stuff was announced. Now that it’s in flames they deserve just as much press.
By w on May 11th, 2009 at 7:02 am
Just more SCPC bullshit.
We will probably lose eleventy kabillion jobs from having hydrogen technology in SC.
Last count….by SCPC numbers…..we have lost more jobs in South Carolina than currently exist in South Carolina.
By King Cotton on May 11th, 2009 at 9:27 am
Brilliant analysis, “w.” If you’re okay with investing $40 million to create just 100 jobs (and those are the numbers put out by USC and others involved with hydrogen development), than I’ve got some swamp land you may be interested in purchasing.
By CSOL guinea on May 11th, 2009 at 4:55 pm
Wonder how big of a cut the boys took for themselves on this laughable excuse for an alternative fuel source?
By Richard on May 12th, 2009 at 9:16 am
Harrell is not competant enough to be in the position he is. Furthermore, he mismanages the real talent that is in the statehouse, although it is few and far between, simply because he doesn’t know how to manage. But folks, let’s keep in mind…you get what you pay for. A salary for a part time SC Legislator is only $24,000 after all is said and done. Not worth the time and efforts for those who are most qualified and needed in those positions.