<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lindsey Graham Doesn&#8217;t Get It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/04/28/lindsey-graham-doesnt-get-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/04/28/lindsey-graham-doesnt-get-it/</link>
	<description>Politics, Sports and Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 20:21:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RON PAUL</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/04/28/lindsey-graham-doesnt-get-it/#comment-53146</link>
		<dc:creator>RON PAUL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=19664#comment-53146</guid>
		<description>You speak the truth fits....I hope everyone holds the rinos to their actions.They should be the first ones tared and featherd.The Democrats at least now admit they are socialists. Read the Constitution!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You speak the truth fits&#8230;.I hope everyone holds the rinos to their actions.They should be the first ones tared and featherd.The Democrats at least now admit they are socialists. Read the Constitution!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lou</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/04/28/lindsey-graham-doesnt-get-it/#comment-53136</link>
		<dc:creator>lou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=19664#comment-53136</guid>
		<description>Fix Social Security??????? HAHAHAHAHA
Republicans fixed it in the early 90&#039;s or late 80&#039;s....one or the other and I am quite sure of that too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fix Social Security??????? HAHAHAHAHA<br />
Republicans fixed it in the early 90&#8242;s or late 80&#8242;s&#8230;.one or the other and I am quite sure of that too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One National Party Under God</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/04/28/lindsey-graham-doesnt-get-it/#comment-53134</link>
		<dc:creator>One National Party Under God</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=19664#comment-53134</guid>
		<description>I frankly  cant tell a tinker&#039;s dam worth of difference between the Repugnants and the Democrats- they can play switcheroo back and forth between parties all they want- the taxpayers are going to get screwed either way.

Obama&#039;s budget increased military spending -  more troops to Afghanistan and vague talk about  coming home from Iraq sometime in the future. Blatant deficit spending programs with no mention nor notion of how to ever balance a BUDGET. Massive bank bailouts  , massive car  bailouts, and a Federal  Reserve which refuses to tell us where they are spending our money- which administration am I describing?

It could be Bush and or Obama -or Barney Frank or Trent Lott  or Teddy Kennedy or Lindsey Graham. They would all do the same things. Fox news and MSNBC  might tell you differently but just look at the big picture.

Look at the trend of our national debt under Bush and now Obama - it seems like a drunken race to see who can rape and pillage and bankrupt us the fastest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I frankly  cant tell a tinker&#8217;s dam worth of difference between the Repugnants and the Democrats- they can play switcheroo back and forth between parties all they want- the taxpayers are going to get screwed either way.</p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s budget increased military spending &#8211;  more troops to Afghanistan and vague talk about  coming home from Iraq sometime in the future. Blatant deficit spending programs with no mention nor notion of how to ever balance a BUDGET. Massive bank bailouts  , massive car  bailouts, and a Federal  Reserve which refuses to tell us where they are spending our money- which administration am I describing?</p>
<p>It could be Bush and or Obama -or Barney Frank or Trent Lott  or Teddy Kennedy or Lindsey Graham. They would all do the same things. Fox news and MSNBC  might tell you differently but just look at the big picture.</p>
<p>Look at the trend of our national debt under Bush and now Obama &#8211; it seems like a drunken race to see who can rape and pillage and bankrupt us the fastest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fitsnews</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/04/28/lindsey-graham-doesnt-get-it/#comment-53133</link>
		<dc:creator>fitsnews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=19664#comment-53133</guid>
		<description>Lindsey has never advertised with us unless it was some random Google ad. He is welcome to advertise with us if he wants, though, but it will stop (or start) nothing.

-FITS

P.S. - Why is it gay-baiting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lindsey has never advertised with us unless it was some random Google ad. He is welcome to advertise with us if he wants, though, but it will stop (or start) nothing.</p>
<p>-FITS</p>
<p>P.S. &#8211; Why is it gay-baiting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Again with the gay baiting</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/04/28/lindsey-graham-doesnt-get-it/#comment-53131</link>
		<dc:creator>Again with the gay baiting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=19664#comment-53131</guid>
		<description>More gay baiting. Great. And if Graham renews his ad spending for this blog, it will stop for a while. Again. Right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More gay baiting. Great. And if Graham renews his ad spending for this blog, it will stop for a while. Again. Right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silence Dogood</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/04/28/lindsey-graham-doesnt-get-it/#comment-53129</link>
		<dc:creator>Silence Dogood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=19664#comment-53129</guid>
		<description>FITS, as a staunch Democrat (who does cross the isle at times) real fiscal conservatism - i.e. balanced budgets due to lesser spending - is perhaps one thing we agree on.  The main problem with the Bush tax cuts was that they were done in vacuum.  Also, once partisan glasses come off and more objective historical lenses are donned, I think looking back to see that we cut taxes/revenues for the governmetn at the same time we were managing an actual war on two fronts and significant increased domestic security spending to boot, not mention passig the biggest drug prescription give away in history under Medicare part D, Bush won&#039;t get the historical thumbs up analysis he was hoping for.

If we do not learn to balance budgets sooner or later a day of reckoning is coming. As what I call - in my VERY hubmle opinion - a real fiscal conservative, I am for moderate tax increases and big government spending CUTS in order to get our nations fiscal house in order.  Now given, you would get booed out of the state for advocating such a position, but it is the kind of pragmatism I think we need right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FITS, as a staunch Democrat (who does cross the isle at times) real fiscal conservatism &#8211; i.e. balanced budgets due to lesser spending &#8211; is perhaps one thing we agree on.  The main problem with the Bush tax cuts was that they were done in vacuum.  Also, once partisan glasses come off and more objective historical lenses are donned, I think looking back to see that we cut taxes/revenues for the governmetn at the same time we were managing an actual war on two fronts and significant increased domestic security spending to boot, not mention passig the biggest drug prescription give away in history under Medicare part D, Bush won&#8217;t get the historical thumbs up analysis he was hoping for.</p>
<p>If we do not learn to balance budgets sooner or later a day of reckoning is coming. As what I call &#8211; in my VERY hubmle opinion &#8211; a real fiscal conservative, I am for moderate tax increases and big government spending CUTS in order to get our nations fiscal house in order.  Now given, you would get booed out of the state for advocating such a position, but it is the kind of pragmatism I think we need right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BIN News</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/04/28/lindsey-graham-doesnt-get-it/#comment-53125</link>
		<dc:creator>BIN News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=19664#comment-53125</guid>
		<description>sic(k) willie, your stupid photoshop pic is confusing. 

Is it intended to make a point? Please explain. 

Or Lindsey may stick that bayonet up your @rse.

Fiscal conservatives are one thing.  Fiscal wackos are another. 

Please don&#039;t ask us to explain, because sic(k) willie has posted enough ultra right wing wacko cr@p on this blog to choke a porn star. Right, Howie?

It is unlikely that sic(k) willie is capable of choking a porn star. Perhaps he could kick one around with broken furniture, but he could not choke her. 

BIN News Editorial Staff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sic(k) willie, your stupid photoshop pic is confusing. </p>
<p>Is it intended to make a point? Please explain. </p>
<p>Or Lindsey may stick that bayonet up your @rse.</p>
<p>Fiscal conservatives are one thing.  Fiscal wackos are another. </p>
<p>Please don&#8217;t ask us to explain, because sic(k) willie has posted enough ultra right wing wacko cr@p on this blog to choke a porn star. Right, Howie?</p>
<p>It is unlikely that sic(k) willie is capable of choking a porn star. Perhaps he could kick one around with broken furniture, but he could not choke her. </p>
<p>BIN News Editorial Staff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: medstudent</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/04/28/lindsey-graham-doesnt-get-it/#comment-53124</link>
		<dc:creator>medstudent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=19664#comment-53124</guid>
		<description>Silence Dogood,

Great point.

&#039;Tax and spend&#039; may be an fair characterization of Democrats&#039; fiscal policy, but &#039;borrow and spend&#039; is an fair characterization of Republicans&#039; fiscal policy.  I wouldn&#039;t call that fiscal conservatism, I&#039;d call it fiscal irresponsibility.

And while the Democrats raising taxes on the wealthiest Americans to pay for the spending is berated as being awful for economic growth, let&#039;s remember the Clinton years.

The longest period of peacetime economic growth happened under Clinton&#039;s tax rates, with budget surpluses and debt reduction.  

I just wish we had some more John Spratts in D.C.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Silence Dogood,</p>
<p>Great point.</p>
<p>&#8216;Tax and spend&#8217; may be an fair characterization of Democrats&#8217; fiscal policy, but &#8216;borrow and spend&#8217; is an fair characterization of Republicans&#8217; fiscal policy.  I wouldn&#8217;t call that fiscal conservatism, I&#8217;d call it fiscal irresponsibility.</p>
<p>And while the Democrats raising taxes on the wealthiest Americans to pay for the spending is berated as being awful for economic growth, let&#8217;s remember the Clinton years.</p>
<p>The longest period of peacetime economic growth happened under Clinton&#8217;s tax rates, with budget surpluses and debt reduction.  </p>
<p>I just wish we had some more John Spratts in D.C.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wow</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/04/28/lindsey-graham-doesnt-get-it/#comment-53123</link>
		<dc:creator>wow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=19664#comment-53123</guid>
		<description>now that picture belongs on an official fits t-shirt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>now that picture belongs on an official fits t-shirt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fitsnews</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/04/28/lindsey-graham-doesnt-get-it/#comment-53120</link>
		<dc:creator>fitsnews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=19664#comment-53120</guid>
		<description>SDG,

Good points ... and we&#039;ve never advocated tax cuts in isolation. In fact, from the article you just commented on, we proposed that the GOP cap spending and do a whole host of other fiscal conservative things.

-FITS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SDG,</p>
<p>Good points &#8230; and we&#8217;ve never advocated tax cuts in isolation. In fact, from the article you just commented on, we proposed that the GOP cap spending and do a whole host of other fiscal conservative things.</p>
<p>-FITS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

