Cheerleader Coach Fired For Nudie Pics
In the latest example of political correctness run amok, a high school cheerleading coach in California has been fired because she posed nude in Playboy under an assumed name.
Except that’s not exactly what happened.
Casa Roble (Ca.) High School previously told Carlie Beck (a.k.a. Carlie Christine) that they didn’t mind the fact she had posed nude as long as she didn’t “advertise” it to the girls.
The firing allegedly took place only after two parents became upset that their daughter didn’t make the squad.
They then decided to take the pictures to the school for “moral” reasons.
From ABC News:
“I didn’t know I was fired until I was sitting at home and started getting texts. The media was at the school wanting to know how I felt about getting fired,” Beck told “Good Morning America.” “Later, someone from the school district called and said, ‘You’ve been fired. Your services are no longer needed.’”
Beck said the school district never told her why she was fired, but “there is a strong correlation with the timing of when the parents brought the pictures in and when I was released.”
Seriously, is Playboy even really porn anymore?
And it’s one thing to fire somebody for posing nude, it’s something else to tell somebody what they did was OK and then fire them for it.
Either way … this thing has totally blown up all over the morning shows and a bunch of lawyers are about to get insanely rich.
And whoa … holy smokes … Carlie whatever your name is we are definitely on your side …
WEB EXTRAS (editor’s note: NSFW)
CC1 – CC2 – CC3 – CC4 – CC5 – CC6 – CC7 – CC8 – CC9 – CC10 – CC11 – CC12 – CC13 – CC14 – CC15 – CC16 – CC17 – CC18 – CC19 – CC20






Comments
By Toyota Kawaski on April 24th, 2009 at 2:09 pm
Nice tramp stamp im sure Ms Fits has one
By UpYers on April 24th, 2009 at 2:51 pm
I’d hit it! On the sidelines!
By Red alert LINK here on April 24th, 2009 at 3:16 pm
It’s a Blog about Stars!!!!
Free music video pictures and ringtones!!))
http://media4you.9f.com/ click the link be my people))))
By James the Foot Soldier on April 24th, 2009 at 3:37 pm
The magnifier feature ROCKS!!
By GGIH on April 24th, 2009 at 3:45 pm
All of which raises interesting questions about whether school employees should be held to a different standard than ordinary people — but then, whose standards are you gonna hold them to? I don’t have a problem with gay teachers, but I sure as hell don’t want my daughter on a cheerleading squad guided by a Playboy Playmate (if I wanted her on a cheerleading squad to start with). So I’ll pick MY standards for the national norm.
By Fashizzle on April 24th, 2009 at 4:15 pm
The comment “I certainly don’t want my daughter on a cheerleading squad guided by a Playboy Playmate” is incredibly disturbing. Posing for Playboy is a perfectly legal act, which she disclosed prior to being hired for this job.
What this woman does in her personal time is her own business. If she were encouraging students to also pose that would be a separate issue; however, no one has suggested she ever discussed it with students. If Playmates are unsuitable to be teachers we should apply the same standard and fire smokers because allowing them near students could influence them to smoke. We should also terminate teachers with different religious views than our own. Where does it end?
By RH on April 24th, 2009 at 4:44 pm
Best article in the history of Sic …… it’s been saved to my favorites.
By James the Foot Soldier on April 24th, 2009 at 4:50 pm
Spring has sprung and the “burn the witches at the stake” bloggers return…..further illustrating to the nation the dire consequences of inbreeding.
By ThenAgain... on April 24th, 2009 at 5:10 pm
Are we supposed to vote for our favorite picture from the links above? Well okay. I pick CC20.
By GGIH on April 24th, 2009 at 7:47 pm
Fashizzle: What I SAID was, if we’re going to hold teachers to a higher standard than ordinary people, then I want MY standards applied.
School districts around the country debate whether to fire teachers for inappropriate behavior, with “inappropriate” defined as everything from drinking to same-sex preferences to (in this case) pornography. All of those are legal acts. Yet there can be no question that teachers influence young lives. Where do YOU want to draw the line?
By BIN News Editorial Staff on April 24th, 2009 at 8:19 pm
The BIN News Staff was united in their response to this. So what? Who cares?
Horry County is burning.
gub’ner Sanfraud (who’s not qualified to be Palin’s V.P.) is about to force schools to lay off brazillions of teachers.
Howie’s carpetbuggers are trying to rape public education with a voucher scam.
And we still wait and wait for sic(k) willie to give details about his crazy claim that a Midland’s elected official has a Strom Problem.
And, what is sic(k) willie doing?
Posting more porn.
By Fashizzle on April 24th, 2009 at 9:01 pm
Simple. If it is legal behavior and it occurs outside the classroom it is no one’s business. Otherwise, you can’t object if I start firing church-goers since I dislike their behavior. Fair enough?
By James the Foot Soldier on April 24th, 2009 at 9:39 pm
12 – hands down (pun intended)
:)
By Collio on April 26th, 2009 at 7:37 am
I really like CC4, CC5, CC20. Well, really, I liked every one of these! She is totally hot. Nice breasts and shaven. One thing I noted on the morning shows, she is really short. But, that is not a problem.
By john on July 12th, 2009 at 11:45 pm
hot moms!!!
u r sexy!!!
i love to see more!!!!!
By john on July 12th, 2009 at 11:48 pm
let me get in your pants