SC’s Government-Controlled Internets

By fitsnews • on April 18, 2009
Comment Print

ethernet

Only in South Carolina can politicos mess-up something as awesome as “the Internets” – all in the name of supporting “education,” which is obviously something they’ve been successfully messing up for decades.

Anyway, a crowd of “community activists,” consultants and other self-described “do-gooders” got together this week at Benedict College to roll up their taxpayer-funded sleeves and get to work on that.

The main theme of their so-called “Broadband in Cities and Towns” conference?

Easy … figuring out just how government can screw up the Internet by using public “stimulus” money to castrate successful private sector providers.

Of course, that’s not what La Socialista and the rest of the government-snowed MSM will tell you happened, but that’s what’s going down.

The core of these boondogglers’ message is that government needs to be heavily involved in subsidizing and regulating the delivery of communication and Internet services.

Great.

In various flavors, this includes the exclusion of commercial tiered-services, government championing of favored technologies and even free universal statewide wireless access.

Rather than leaving existing commercial Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to continue with their massive, privately-financed roll-out of fiber and wireless networks, they believe government ought to meddle in the process through regulations, subsidies, and the mythical public-private partnerships (as in taxpayer risk, bureaucrat profit).

Essentially, they’re advocating a government take-over all things IT for everyone in the State.

A single, government-controlled Internet, in other words.

Obviously, the single-provider system doesn’t have a great track record. Remember the no-service, no-options days of Ma’ Bell? She got the “ill communication” yo – to which even the Beastie Boys were wise.

But crappy choice and poor service doesn’t really matter when so much public money is at stake – and when there’s yet another opportunity for greedy bureaucrats to grow government at the expense of the private sector.

South Carolina already ranks 5th in the nation for having the most extensive wireless broadband coverage (according to CostQuest).

Fifth in the nation, people.

So obviously, increasing actual Internet access rates is not what these bureaucrats are trying to do.

Besides, (duh) our kids can’t read anyway. So print or Internet, what’s the difference?

There’s no social good being advanced here, just more government greed.

The real agenda is what’s going on all across the country – a taxpayer-funded drive to destroy the private sector market.

That’s why everyone at this “conference” heartily agreed that the gushing spigot of bailout money should help finance that destruction (not to mention line their own personal and institutional pockets).

The lust and ambition was barely sublimated as these insiders exchanged notes and traded detailed tips on how to bring home as-large-as-possible chunks of the $7.2 billion in federal bailout money that’s been slated for “broadband.”

Other presenters made that case that further “untold millions” from the broader $700 billion TARP bailout could be directed to socialized Internet projects if taxpayer-funded grant writers were creative enough.

Among those eagerly bellying up to the forthcoming teat of public money included bureaucrats from (surprise) the State Department of Education, Clemson University, contract hungry “researchers” from the Strom Thurmond Institute, and even some government-approved private companies who hope that public money will float their vague but tech-savvy-sounding business plans.

Anyone keeping tabs on the countless big-government agendas to “spur economic development” in South Carolina (endowed chairs, clusters, technology incubators, etc…) knows that the only impact from this type of communism is higher taxes to float the salaries of the consultants and technocrats that will be cashing-in on it.

We can’t afford that, but try telling that to somebody whose “expanding Internet access to poor kids.”

Remember, it’s all about the children. Especially poor black ones.

Match.com

Comments

By BIN News Editorial Staff on April 18th, 2009 at 12:33 pm

The only thing missing in this cr@p are allegations from sic(k) willie this is all a left wing radical plot to block his sad little porn site in public schools (including universities) and libraries.

Porn should be blocked, right?

Everyone knows sik(k) willie thinks it’s all about sic(k) willie. And he wants us to think everything is a left wing radical plot, and we all know their plots are worse than right wing radical plots. ;)

Just more meaningless cr@p from the dude who brought us wacko allegations of a SLED “beat down squad” and wacko allegations of a Midlands’ elected official with a “Strom problem.” And the same dude who tried to dig gold over the grave of a “poor little black girl.” When will you post facts on this cr@p?

BIN News Editorial Staff
Increasingly Bored by sic(k) willie,
but still with Flair and Balance

By Really on April 18th, 2009 at 2:34 pm

BIN, seriously… I’m almost to the point that I think you work with fitsnews just to be the guy that everyone hates. If you are so bored with s(l)ic(k) willie, then why do you contribute to this site just as much as he does?

By ArtsTechie on April 18th, 2009 at 5:05 pm

From the people that brought you crappy schools, an uncompetitive port, an insanely stupid tax code, and blankets for the old people… it’s subsidized internet!
Realistically though, this is probably going to pan out into the same sort of government designed munici-wifi fiasko that failed in cities and towns across the nation, then, after it fails and is bailed out, whatever tax/fee/regulation that was setup to pay for it will stay around forever, like the the USF.

By Beltway on April 18th, 2009 at 6:14 pm

Nice reporting, this type of stuff usually goes under the radar, but it is conferences like these where the consultants and corporate sponsors convince local and state governments to make high risk and under-informed spectrum and technology choices using public money; Usually well-intended, but always bad for the consumer and taxpayer.

By Mike on April 18th, 2009 at 6:51 pm

I am starting to agree with you, “Really.” Most actual whack-jobs eventually go back to their momma’s doublewide and disappear. If you are in fact BIN News, please let him go, Sic. It’s supremely annoying…

By BIN News Editorial Staff on April 18th, 2009 at 7:14 pm

Really, seriously! Good question. BIN News is working on a Mission Statement that should answer your question. Several drafts have been submitted to our funding editor by senior staffers, but she has not made a final decision.

Until our Mission Statement is available, our staff will continue to highlight sik(k) willie’s scams as time permits in our busy schedule.

We can share with you that we are deeply troubled that you “hate” BIN News.

Get some anger management counseling. sic(k) willie can give you insight into the problems that uncontrolled anger can cause. You know.

Broken doors and furniture. Battered women. CDV conviction. Etc.

BIN News Editorial Staff
Flair and Balanced

By mark g on April 19th, 2009 at 2:28 am

The conference could be summed up like this: AT&T rules in SC– they get whatever they want. So don’t bother.

That “fifth in the nation” is AT&T propaganda. Internet service in SC actually lags way behind– in availability and speed. The average upload speed is 332 kbps, 43rd in the nation. Use of Internet is 15% behind the nation. It’s difficult to know about exact rural Internet access, because AT&T and other won’t cooperate on numbers, but most agree SC rural counties are far behind other rural states.

People in the wireless industry think SC legislators are a bunch of county bumpkins for passing on millions of dollars in wireless leases last year (maybe a prelude to passing on the stimulus money?)

It’s most profitable for AT&T to use legacy systems and serve populous areas. So who cares about real speed or serving rural areas? Not our government– we all know SC has a dysfunctional government.

SC pays twice the market rate for Internet in the schools to AT&T and others in a no-bid contract through the CIO. Does that make sense to anyone?

I’m not sure why the people of SC are so willing to be dupped, or why this crack report neglects the facts. But people of SC– add this to the very long list of ways your government is letting you down.

By Wyreless on April 19th, 2009 at 7:26 pm

Of course this will go under the radar. It is a fine example of unelected incompetents trying to make decisions that screw the rest of us over. Why should the government step in to do what private companies are already doing? Some of the people involved may be well-intended, but I’m sure there are just as many fantasizing about how to get the “stimulus” money into their own hands.
People need to be informed about this!Good work.

By BIN News Editorial Staff on April 19th, 2009 at 9:53 pm

sik(k) willie has been busy today pumping up his hit count with bogus posts.

By just another joe on April 20th, 2009 at 8:36 pm

What is this about the state giving blankets to old people. I’m old, where is my blanket? Mark g – so true.

Leave a Comment