Comments on: Lawyers, Lobbyists, Lawmakers Try To Go Around Sanford

By: Bombthrower

Bombthrower — Sat, 18 Apr 2009 23:32:55 +0000

Sanford has shit and fallen’ back in it. Let him get himself out of this box he put himself in. He is such an idiot – Sanford will be gone in two years! I will have a party when he leaves. He will make the next governor look great no matter how bad he is. Sanford was a waste of eight good years. We got nothing out of him but a governor who realized too late that this is a legislative state and not a gubanatorial state.

By: fitsnews

fitsnews — Sat, 18 Apr 2009 02:25:44 +0000

Wes,

Sic Willie IS obsessed with himself.

What’s your point?

You keep coming back for more, don’t you?

-FITS

By: Wes Wolfe

Wes Wolfe — Sat, 18 Apr 2009 01:23:55 +0000

Your sources? God, you are obsessed with yourself. You can ask a State House guard, and they could tell you that. Hell, you probably made up the quote yourself, considering that over half of what you post concerning state politics is pure fiction. It must be so much easier to create stories out of whole cloth, eh?

By: Mab

Mab — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 21:51:50 +0000

Yeah, ~lol~

HarPoutlian’s newest masterpiece: whining mall rat. Brilliant.

By: Shark

Shark — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:16:12 +0000

lol

By: fitsnews

fitsnews — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:31:53 +0000

JC-

If she “doesn’t need the first cue card to out-think the likes of Sic,” then tell her (whatever her name is) that Sic Willie will debate her on “stimulus” funding or any topic she wants to discuss at a time and place of her choosing.

Name the time and place, he’ll be there.

She can even bring Harpootlian and Drake with her if she wants.

We recommend Gatsby’s soda fountain in Irmo on a non-school night, but that’s just us.

-FITS

By: JC

JC — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:24:19 +0000

Silly fitsboy. You should really look into what’s known as r e s e a r c h. That means you actually find out the facts of something before attempting to write about it. Perhaps if you’d done a little of this, you could have expressed your views of this lawsuit without spewing and ranting. If your point is valid, in what you write, it will stand alone. You won’t need to stoop to name-calling and guessing. It’s obvious you know nothing about Ms. Edwards, her backgroud or how she came to initiate this suit, all by herself. BTW, I don’t know too many mall rats that have full academic scholarships to some of the most prestigious schools in the country. And certainly she doesn’t need the first cue card to out-think the likes of you.

By: Jeremy Johnson

Jeremy Johnson — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:41:39 +0000

Right on SIc, the whole thing is unconstitutional and we shouldn’t have any part of it. Rick Perry has the right idea.

By: Toyota Kawaski

Toyota Kawaski — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:41:10 +0000

yes Gov.Moonbeam we will suck eggs for you

By: TODD

TODD — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:16:47 +0000

JTFS:
Your suggestion is not as silly as some may believe on first review. Under the present system, all lawyers practice law only at the pleasure of Queen Jean. Only she decides who keeps a license and who does not. Since all lawyers are required to be her loyal subjects, to work in the legislature does indeed create a conflict of interest for lawyers to be in the legislature.