Confederate Evasion
An eight year odyssey of evasion finally ended last month when a judge ordered S.C. Senate President Glenn McConnell and Warren Lasch’s “Friends of the Hunley” group to pay $140,000 in court costs to Greenville, S.C. government watchdog Ned Sloan, the prevailing party in one of our state’s most significant open records lawsuits.
The story of Sloan v. The Submarine is one of mind-boggling contempt for the people of South Carolina, whose open records laws were trampled under foot as McConnell – the powerful Senate President – funneled millions of taxpayer dollars into a secretive group charged with “restoring” the Confederate submarine H.L. Hunley.
Eight years ago, Sloan sent a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to “Friends of the Hunley” asking for information about its taxpayer-funded operations.
FOIA’s are common information gathering tools used by reporters and government watchdogs to gather public information, and South Carolina’s FOIA law is written very broadly so as to prevent public entities from hiding information about their activities.
Nonetheless, Sloan’s request was rejected, prompting a legal battle that “Friends of the Hunley” managed to stretch out for nearly a decade.
From Judge Joseph Strickland’s ruling last month:
This litigation has taken nearly eight years to resolve … Only after litigation had begun did (Friends of the Hunley) produce the documents Plaintiff originally request under FOIA, and only after the litigation progressed to oral argument before our Supreme Court, did Defendants concede that they were indeed a public body subject to FOIA.
Indeed, “Friends of the Hunley” stonewalled right up to the end, and only when a Supreme Court defeat was staring them in the face did they provide Sloan with the public information he requested.
Of course, their objective in doing so obviously wasn’t to be transparent, it was to avoid having to pay the price for their obstructionism.
Quoting again from his ruling, though, Judge Strickland was having none of that:
… the Friends of the Hunley, “after extensive litigation, at the eleventh hour, and facing imminent defeat, [attempted to] simply moot [the] case in order to dodge this fee-shifting statute.”
Good for him.
Strickland’s ruling is a huge victory for open government – and for the press. Which is why it’s funny that no mainstream media outlet in South Carolina has even mentioned it.
“Friends of the Hunley” spent four years trying to hide their taxpayer-funded shenanigans from public view, and another four years trying to duck the costs associated with doing so.
Now they’ve been busted on both counts.
According to Strickland, McConnell and Lasch “transformed a simple FOIA request and the applicability of FOIA into complex and drawn out litigation.”
That’s putting it nicely.
Nonetheless, the message to government entities here is simple: “Stonewall at your own risk.”






Comments
By Gene E. Nowak on March 18th, 2009 at 10:59 am
The cost is still being shifted to the taxpayers not the persons responsible for the attempt to conceal the facts. Now is the time for criminal proceedings to punish those that are guilty of obstruction.
By cgi-bin laden on March 18th, 2009 at 11:26 am
can you find somewhere to post the decision? Some of us would like to see it.
By Philip Branton on March 18th, 2009 at 1:04 pm
Not only has McConnell-ista displayed a glaring example of WHAT is wrong with our state; but has kept lawyers on the SC tit swapping how many trees of PAPER and how many MEGA-watts of computer and lights …COAL…!?!?!
My Backside…!!!!!
The fact that papers have whiffed this decision is proof enough that their THUMBS need to be whacked too…!?!?!
No wonder citizens don’t CARE….they don’t know…!?!
By James the Foot Soldier on March 18th, 2009 at 4:41 pm
Kudos to Mr. Sloan – I’ve not read an article where the man has EVER lost a case.
Perhaps he could tutor Henry McMaster??
By Honky Tonk Bar Association on March 18th, 2009 at 5:42 pm
James, Mr. Sloan has been on the losing side before. For example, check out his attempt to keep Gov. Sanford out of office in Sloan v. Sanford, 357 S.C. 431, 593 S.E.2d 470 (2004). Like all of us, he wins some, he loses some.
By Richard on March 18th, 2009 at 7:38 pm
McConnell…is a long serving Republican in the General Assembly…therefore he is a crook. What’s so hard to understand about that?
By SumterStreetBoyz on March 18th, 2009 at 9:16 pm
Stealing taxpayer $$ and then personaly cashing in over the graves of dead submariners? There is a special place in hell for this crew of modern day carpetbaggers.
Yes. Wrap yourselves in replica Confederate garb … If only a real officer would come back from the dead to deliver justice!
Why do the people if SC stand for this?
Where is the State and the Charleston Post?
Maybe time to get the WSJ involved.
By Cooter Brown on March 21st, 2009 at 9:40 am
I sho’ hates dat dis hear scandoll hasta do wit da Hundley. Ol’ Cooter wuz at dat funeral fer dem brave soldiers an’ it wuz a beautiful an’ glorious thin’ to behold! Now tainted wit monry an’ scandoll– dem soldier deserves betta dan dat!
By Cicero on March 21st, 2009 at 1:11 pm
Here’s the devil in the detail’s. Anyone, like myself, with a limited
education who keeps up with SC politics on a day by day basis knows Sloan
is not a “watchdog,” he’s an opportunist/activist. All of us know McConnel
is a Confederate supporter. McConnell did not, nor, could not “funnel,” funds
to the Hunley project. This was done with the support of the entire Legislature. It was done with the purpose of eventually having a world class
tourism draw.
The recovery of, and the restortion and eventual display of the Hunley is
of incredible Naval/Maritime historical importance.
Don’t throw McConnel under the bus… or I’ll add other names. Just because this was a judical find..doesn’t make it right, or JUSTICE.