<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Shocking Gubernatorial Polling!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/03/15/more-shocking-gubernatorial-polling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/03/15/more-shocking-gubernatorial-polling/</link>
	<description>Politics, Sports and Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:26:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8216;Garrett&#8217; has a name ID problem &#124; The Palmetto Scoop</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/03/15/more-shocking-gubernatorial-polling/#comment-50690</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8216;Garrett&#8217; has a name ID problem &#124; The Palmetto Scoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=16322#comment-50690</guid>
		<description>[...] poll conducted by Barrett&#8217;s own campaign showed he had 49 percent statewide name ID, compared to 75 percent for Attorney General Henry [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] poll conducted by Barrett&#8217;s own campaign showed he had 49 percent statewide name ID, compared to 75 percent for Attorney General Henry [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lou</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/03/15/more-shocking-gubernatorial-polling/#comment-49472</link>
		<dc:creator>lou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=16322#comment-49472</guid>
		<description>These three sicken me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These three sicken me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toyota Kawaski</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/03/15/more-shocking-gubernatorial-polling/#comment-49466</link>
		<dc:creator>Toyota Kawaski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=16322#comment-49466</guid>
		<description>More egg suckn by fits</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More egg suckn by fits</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scene SC</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/03/15/more-shocking-gubernatorial-polling/#comment-49450</link>
		<dc:creator>Scene SC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 04:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=16322#comment-49450</guid>
		<description>Whatever dude.  SC doesn&#039;t need a Reformer.  We need an Informer.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=swyH8aQHveU</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever dude.  SC doesn&#8217;t need a Reformer.  We need an Informer.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=swyH8aQHveU" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=swyH8aQHveU</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not Sure I Get The Joke</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/03/15/more-shocking-gubernatorial-polling/#comment-49442</link>
		<dc:creator>Not Sure I Get The Joke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 23:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=16322#comment-49442</guid>
		<description>I love how these posts are written with disgust as though internal polling is anything new.  Campaigns have always polled and released the findings when it suits - that&#039;s nothing new.  It looks as though the Barrett campaign was pretty up front about it by simply posting it on their site.  The main difference in this case, is that Quinn polls have proven to be pretty shotty once election day rolls around - Beasley, Condon, Rick Quinn etc.  Ayers polling for clients tends to reflect what actually happens.

So let&#039;s lose this charade that it&#039;s some shocking event when a campaign conducts a poll.  Will - if one of your past or current clients chooses to run for Governor, I&#039;m sure they&#039;ll conduct some polling as well that you&#039;ll pretend to bash on your site while pushing as &quot;the real deal&quot; on background.

P.S. Eric - your suggestion of Mick is probably music to Will&#039;s ears as he is also a paid client.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love how these posts are written with disgust as though internal polling is anything new.  Campaigns have always polled and released the findings when it suits &#8211; that&#8217;s nothing new.  It looks as though the Barrett campaign was pretty up front about it by simply posting it on their site.  The main difference in this case, is that Quinn polls have proven to be pretty shotty once election day rolls around &#8211; Beasley, Condon, Rick Quinn etc.  Ayers polling for clients tends to reflect what actually happens.</p>
<p>So let&#8217;s lose this charade that it&#8217;s some shocking event when a campaign conducts a poll.  Will &#8211; if one of your past or current clients chooses to run for Governor, I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ll conduct some polling as well that you&#8217;ll pretend to bash on your site while pushing as &#8220;the real deal&#8221; on background.</p>
<p>P.S. Eric &#8211; your suggestion of Mick is probably music to Will&#8217;s ears as he is also a paid client.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/03/15/more-shocking-gubernatorial-polling/#comment-49440</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 21:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=16322#comment-49440</guid>
		<description>Maybe Mick Mulvaney will come to the front.  He&#039;s a good politician from up here in the Charlotte area (SC side of course).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Mick Mulvaney will come to the front.  He&#8217;s a good politician from up here in the Charlotte area (SC side of course).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/03/15/more-shocking-gubernatorial-polling/#comment-49438</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 20:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=16322#comment-49438</guid>
		<description>SCDP Rejects Mark Sanford&#039;s Appointment of Richard Eckstrom to Oversee Spending of Stimulus Funds

March 12, 2009

SCDP Chair Responds to Sanford Appointment

Carol Fowler, chair of the South Carolina Democratic Party, issued the following statement today in response to Gov. Mark Sanford’s appointment of Comptroller General Richard Eckstrom to oversee spending of federal money:

“South Carolinians have a right to expect careful scrutiny of spending from the federal economic stimulus plan. However, Gov. Mark Sanford’s choice of Richard Eckstrom for this task shows remarkably bad judgment.

“Mr. Eckstrom himself has been a terrible steward of taxpayer dollars. He has a history of improper behavior for which South Carolina’s citizens had to pay: he misused a state vehicle and he used state dollars to settle a sexual harassment suit against himself.”

In 2004, Eckstrom took a state-issued minivan on a 3,615-mile trip to Minnesota and charged $665 on a state-issued gas card along the way. Only when the media caught Eckstrom and broke the story in late September 2006 did he repay the illegal charges. In 1997, Eckstrom faced sexual harassment allegations and used $57,500 of state funds to pay for a legal settlement.

South Carolina Democratic Party

PRESS RELEASE:
http://schotlinepress.wordpress.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SCDP Rejects Mark Sanford&#8217;s Appointment of Richard Eckstrom to Oversee Spending of Stimulus Funds</p>
<p>March 12, 2009</p>
<p>SCDP Chair Responds to Sanford Appointment</p>
<p>Carol Fowler, chair of the South Carolina Democratic Party, issued the following statement today in response to Gov. Mark Sanford’s appointment of Comptroller General Richard Eckstrom to oversee spending of federal money:</p>
<p>“South Carolinians have a right to expect careful scrutiny of spending from the federal economic stimulus plan. However, Gov. Mark Sanford’s choice of Richard Eckstrom for this task shows remarkably bad judgment.</p>
<p>“Mr. Eckstrom himself has been a terrible steward of taxpayer dollars. He has a history of improper behavior for which South Carolina’s citizens had to pay: he misused a state vehicle and he used state dollars to settle a sexual harassment suit against himself.”</p>
<p>In 2004, Eckstrom took a state-issued minivan on a 3,615-mile trip to Minnesota and charged $665 on a state-issued gas card along the way. Only when the media caught Eckstrom and broke the story in late September 2006 did he repay the illegal charges. In 1997, Eckstrom faced sexual harassment allegations and used $57,500 of state funds to pay for a legal settlement.</p>
<p>South Carolina Democratic Party</p>
<p>PRESS RELEASE:<br />
<a href="http://schotlinepress.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://schotlinepress.wordpress.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/03/15/more-shocking-gubernatorial-polling/#comment-49435</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 19:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=16322#comment-49435</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t Nikki Haley quit paying your dumb ass?  Why are you still promoting her?  

What makes you think the people of this state want another one your libertarian idiots in the governor&#039;s office anyway?  The results are clear with Sanford.  It really isn&#039;t necessary to elaborate.

Cool goatee, loser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t Nikki Haley quit paying your dumb ass?  Why are you still promoting her?  </p>
<p>What makes you think the people of this state want another one your libertarian idiots in the governor&#8217;s office anyway?  The results are clear with Sanford.  It really isn&#8217;t necessary to elaborate.</p>
<p>Cool goatee, loser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yellow Journalist</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/03/15/more-shocking-gubernatorial-polling/#comment-49428</link>
		<dc:creator>Yellow Journalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 18:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=16322#comment-49428</guid>
		<description>Mr. Folks,

Are you suggesting that you received no payment from Mr. Davis or from any other entity for services rendered to Mr. Davis? Because some of your friends are saying otherwise. Columbia is still a small town and when there&#039;s a mouth in it as big as yours, things are easily overheard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Folks,</p>
<p>Are you suggesting that you received no payment from Mr. Davis or from any other entity for services rendered to Mr. Davis? Because some of your friends are saying otherwise. Columbia is still a small town and when there&#8217;s a mouth in it as big as yours, things are easily overheard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fitsnews</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/03/15/more-shocking-gubernatorial-polling/#comment-49423</link>
		<dc:creator>fitsnews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 18:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=16322#comment-49423</guid>
		<description>Yellow-

You say that Folks&#039; previous &quot;association with Ms. Haley is a matter of public record.&quot;

It is ... so that covers that, unless of course you&#039;re too retarded to use the S.C. Ethics Commission website.

As for Folks&#039; relationship with Sen. Davis, it is more of a &quot;man crush&quot; than anything else, and his counsel on Tom&#039;s television advertisements (which were actually filmed in Beaufort, Bluffton and Hilton Head Island) was provided on a strictly pro bono basis.

Walter Whetsell and Le Frye ran Davis&#039; campaign, with an assist from up-and-coming GOP operative Vic Bailey and some very capable volunteers.

-FITS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yellow-</p>
<p>You say that Folks&#8217; previous &#8220;association with Ms. Haley is a matter of public record.&#8221;</p>
<p>It is &#8230; so that covers that, unless of course you&#8217;re too retarded to use the S.C. Ethics Commission website.</p>
<p>As for Folks&#8217; relationship with Sen. Davis, it is more of a &#8220;man crush&#8221; than anything else, and his counsel on Tom&#8217;s television advertisements (which were actually filmed in Beaufort, Bluffton and Hilton Head Island) was provided on a strictly pro bono basis.</p>
<p>Walter Whetsell and Le Frye ran Davis&#8217; campaign, with an assist from up-and-coming GOP operative Vic Bailey and some very capable volunteers.</p>
<p>-FITS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

