<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: $coop $lams $ic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/03/10/scoop-slams-sic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/03/10/scoop-slams-sic/</link>
	<description>Politics, Sports and Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:20:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BIN KNews Editorial Stiff</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/03/10/scoop-slams-sic/#comment-49213</link>
		<dc:creator>BIN KNews Editorial Stiff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=15963#comment-49213</guid>
		<description>Gee, sic(k) willie. It seems people know you. 

Maybe you should make this a fee based blog. 

Then you could also post real porn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, sic(k) willie. It seems people know you. </p>
<p>Maybe you should make this a fee based blog. </p>
<p>Then you could also post real porn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earl Capps</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/03/10/scoop-slams-sic/#comment-49166</link>
		<dc:creator>Earl Capps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=15963#comment-49166</guid>
		<description>Will, I always suspected you were a gigolo!

The view is much better over here, no matter who is paying for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will, I always suspected you were a gigolo!</p>
<p>The view is much better over here, no matter who is paying for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toyota Kawaski</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/03/10/scoop-slams-sic/#comment-49163</link>
		<dc:creator>Toyota Kawaski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=15963#comment-49163</guid>
		<description>Tom Davis is a blow hard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom Davis is a blow hard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old Bike Dude</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/03/10/scoop-slams-sic/#comment-49160</link>
		<dc:creator>Old Bike Dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=15963#comment-49160</guid>
		<description>$ic you need some transparency at FITS. Start with finishing the SLED beatdown (allegedly) story. Then explain Sansford&#039;s ESI company vs his aversion to unemployment benefits. I believe it&#039;s becoming apparent that the mexican&#039;s painting Davis&#039;s house were not only illegal but came from ESI. Was Ceips right and were we all duped?
Oh...and more porn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$ic you need some transparency at FITS. Start with finishing the SLED beatdown (allegedly) story. Then explain Sansford&#8217;s ESI company vs his aversion to unemployment benefits. I believe it&#8217;s becoming apparent that the mexican&#8217;s painting Davis&#8217;s house were not only illegal but came from ESI. Was Ceips right and were we all duped?<br />
Oh&#8230;and more porn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caroline</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/03/10/scoop-slams-sic/#comment-49155</link>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 04:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=15963#comment-49155</guid>
		<description>Wes, I guarantee you McMaster has fewer skeletons in his closet than Andre Bauer.  

But really, all three candidates are average and there is little difference between how they will govern.  That&#039;s why I like the idea of Tom Davis. Anyone have any inside scoop on whether he&#039;ll run?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wes, I guarantee you McMaster has fewer skeletons in his closet than Andre Bauer.  </p>
<p>But really, all three candidates are average and there is little difference between how they will govern.  That&#8217;s why I like the idea of Tom Davis. Anyone have any inside scoop on whether he&#8217;ll run?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes Wolfe</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/03/10/scoop-slams-sic/#comment-49151</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes Wolfe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 03:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=15963#comment-49151</guid>
		<description>I cannot believe Fogle pulled this. Can anything here be considered news? I thought this info had gone out over a year ago, processed, digested and left alone as not amounting to much at all. Considering the brain trust over at RQ&amp;A, maybe we should all start a pool on whether Henry Mac will make it into the runoff. Guessing not. He has more skeletons in his closet than a Halloween party store. Once Bauer and Barrett go aggressive on oppo, he will seriously be in trouble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot believe Fogle pulled this. Can anything here be considered news? I thought this info had gone out over a year ago, processed, digested and left alone as not amounting to much at all. Considering the brain trust over at RQ&amp;A, maybe we should all start a pool on whether Henry Mac will make it into the runoff. Guessing not. He has more skeletons in his closet than a Halloween party store. Once Bauer and Barrett go aggressive on oppo, he will seriously be in trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Pickett</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/03/10/scoop-slams-sic/#comment-49147</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Pickett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 03:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=15963#comment-49147</guid>
		<description>Sewell and Fogle are both hooked in to the same crowd: the Ports Authority machine. They throw around a lot of money, which they refuse to disclose.  Some of which pays consultants to make up reasons not to privatize the port.  Adam is repeating a bunch of gibberish one of them likely made up.  Port already privatized?  BS! It is owned and operated by the state, is losing money and cannot expand without billions of dollars in new capital, which we cannot possibly get without private investment.  And if we don&#039;t get it, the port will keep losing business, and we&#039;ll keep losing jobs.  It is that simple. 

Sewell and Fogle are also both getting paid, just as they say Will is.  The difference is government clients vs. private individuals.  Sewell definitely has been paid by taxpayers, and Fogle likely has.  But I doubt we&#039;ve picked up the tab for any of Will&#039;s consulting genius.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sewell and Fogle are both hooked in to the same crowd: the Ports Authority machine. They throw around a lot of money, which they refuse to disclose.  Some of which pays consultants to make up reasons not to privatize the port.  Adam is repeating a bunch of gibberish one of them likely made up.  Port already privatized?  BS! It is owned and operated by the state, is losing money and cannot expand without billions of dollars in new capital, which we cannot possibly get without private investment.  And if we don&#8217;t get it, the port will keep losing business, and we&#8217;ll keep losing jobs.  It is that simple. </p>
<p>Sewell and Fogle are also both getting paid, just as they say Will is.  The difference is government clients vs. private individuals.  Sewell definitely has been paid by taxpayers, and Fogle likely has.  But I doubt we&#8217;ve picked up the tab for any of Will&#8217;s consulting genius.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: craig</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/03/10/scoop-slams-sic/#comment-49146</link>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 03:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=15963#comment-49146</guid>
		<description>Tom Davis must be polling well in Richard&#039;s polls of the Gov field. You know, the data he DIDN&quot;T leak to the Free Times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom Davis must be polling well in Richard&#8217;s polls of the Gov field. You know, the data he DIDN&#8221;T leak to the Free Times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scene SC</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/03/10/scoop-slams-sic/#comment-49145</link>
		<dc:creator>Scene SC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 03:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=15963#comment-49145</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re both sell outs.  I just like how Adam doesn&#039;t comment on his own post 10 times with different names.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re both sell outs.  I just like how Adam doesn&#8217;t comment on his own post 10 times with different names.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Hendrix</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/03/10/scoop-slams-sic/#comment-49140</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Hendrix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 03:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=15963#comment-49140</guid>
		<description>Ugh, you&#039;re accusing somebody of tossing around wild insults and unsubstantiated accusations to advance a political agenda? Oh the irony. From the people who brought us the daily scandal that, ugh, never becomes a scandal. Whatever.

Where&#039;s the newest post on the first 45 days the Obama Adminstration possibly &quot;already destroying America&quot; or idiotic talk of raising the top 4 percent representing &quot;Marxism.&quot; Or a lawyer making an accusation and conflating that into the &quot;biggest in SC history&quot;? Sweet, sweet irony.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh, you&#8217;re accusing somebody of tossing around wild insults and unsubstantiated accusations to advance a political agenda? Oh the irony. From the people who brought us the daily scandal that, ugh, never becomes a scandal. Whatever.</p>
<p>Where&#8217;s the newest post on the first 45 days the Obama Adminstration possibly &#8220;already destroying America&#8221; or idiotic talk of raising the top 4 percent representing &#8220;Marxism.&#8221; Or a lawyer making an accusation and conflating that into the &#8220;biggest in SC history&#8221;? Sweet, sweet irony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

