<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not This Doofus Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/02/24/not-this-doofus-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/02/24/not-this-doofus-again/</link>
	<description>Politics, Sports and Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:44:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crazy60</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/02/24/not-this-doofus-again/#comment-71827</link>
		<dc:creator>Crazy60</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 16:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=14783#comment-71827</guid>
		<description>I think a key factor for this market in particular is that people will tend to stick with what they have. ,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a key factor for this market in particular is that people will tend to stick with what they have. ,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/02/24/not-this-doofus-again/#comment-48301</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=14783#comment-48301</guid>
		<description>Brad,
   Thank you! Often, teens are told that they can&#039;t understand whats going on in politics at their age and personally, that gets really annoying. I watch Bill O&#039;Riley, Greta, and Glenn Beck every night. I&#039;m also one of the students involved in Ms.Payne&#039;s Civics Class/Current Issues Class; which is blogged about on this site quite often. Thank you again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad,<br />
   Thank you! Often, teens are told that they can&#8217;t understand whats going on in politics at their age and personally, that gets really annoying. I watch Bill O&#8217;Riley, Greta, and Glenn Beck every night. I&#8217;m also one of the students involved in Ms.Payne&#8217;s Civics Class/Current Issues Class; which is blogged about on this site quite often. Thank you again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/02/24/not-this-doofus-again/#comment-48300</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=14783#comment-48300</guid>
		<description>Brian:
I think Brad answered all of your questions for me. Thank you for your viewpoints. I always like to see the other side of the arguement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian:<br />
I think Brad answered all of your questions for me. Thank you for your viewpoints. I always like to see the other side of the arguement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad R</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/02/24/not-this-doofus-again/#comment-48280</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 09:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=14783#comment-48280</guid>
		<description>Rebecca,

I salute your interest in politics at such a young age. Keep it up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rebecca,</p>
<p>I salute your interest in politics at such a young age. Keep it up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad R</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/02/24/not-this-doofus-again/#comment-48279</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 09:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=14783#comment-48279</guid>
		<description>Brain,
Thanks for your response.
I actually really like Ron Paul, and if he didn&#039;t come off as such a nutcase, I may actually vote for him. He&#039;s got good ideas, some of them quite improbable, but I like his way of thinking.
My biggest problem (which is actually quite small) with Mitt is that he panders. I trust him when he says that he believes in certain ideals and more importantly I trust he&#039;ll keep his word which is more than I can say for 99% of politicians out there. But he does lay it on quite thick sometimes, probably because most people need that kind of show in order to get past stubborn preconceptions.
As for your comments about Mitt, I can address a few further. I don&#039;t think that anyone would disagree that what we need now is someone who can pare down our expenses and raise revenue enough to get us back in the black. Regardless of the fact of whether this is done in an internal entity (one you are actually a part of) or an external entity (one that you have bought and plan on selling), it is a valuable skill. Mitt has done this nearly his entire career. That he bought and then sold the companies he improved is really irrelevant. He will essentially perform the same necessary actions to return an entity to profitability internally in the government as he would have in a company he was preparing to sell. As for the long-term profitability of the companies he helped, take a look at Bain &amp; Co, Staples, Domino&#039;s, Sealey, etc. If you look at the before and after of the market caps, profitability, stock prices (especially stock price because it is a market speculation of the company&#039;s prospects), etc, then you will clearly see that these companies have been better off than they were before he touched them. I think you may be one of the only people that doubts Romney&#039;s ability to turn companies around. You don&#039;t make money at doing something if you&#039;re not good at it. 
As far as starting out with capital to make more, of course you have a valid point; my point is that it doesn&#039;t diminish his successes. He made something better out of what he had which is more than can be said for others who have inherited wealth. And as far as the government not having capital, the treasure is the ultimate source of capital. Where are we getting the trillions of dollars we are spending now? Borrowing and printing. The companies that Mitt improved weren&#039;t loaded with capital when he took the helm - if they were, they wouldn&#039;t have needed him. His genius is creating capital where others cannot. Applied to the federal government, the way our politicians are creating capital now is by printing it and we&#039;re now seeing the first effects of that - our most recent inflation numbers are alarming. While that would certainly be needed in any administration, Romney&#039;s ability to streamline (been proven time and time again) would minimize that need.
Next: You can&#039;t blame all of Massachusetts&#039; problem on Romney. There is no question that he took a deficit and turned it into a surplus. He also did so without raising taxes, although you seem to think that fees are the same. Not true. Fees are associated with a particular use and are only levied on the user; taxes are broad based and are levied on everyone. To most fiscal conservatives, this system makes much more sense than not.
Next: Romney&#039;s job. To correct one of your statements, Romney NEVER wanted a McCain cabinet position. He stated that very clearly as he seen what others go through in those positions. He wanted the Presidency and it&#039;s clear he would have loved to have been VP, but he never wanted a cabinet position. So if he doesn&#039;t have a 9-to-5 job, it is most certainly by choice.
It seems you&#039;re most intent on finding reasons to dislike him instead of finding reasons to like him. I can&#039;t think of anyone in this past race who had a more stellar economic record and a cleaner history. I may sound rather adulatory but it&#039;s only because I can&#039;t find much not to like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brain,<br />
Thanks for your response.<br />
I actually really like Ron Paul, and if he didn&#8217;t come off as such a nutcase, I may actually vote for him. He&#8217;s got good ideas, some of them quite improbable, but I like his way of thinking.<br />
My biggest problem (which is actually quite small) with Mitt is that he panders. I trust him when he says that he believes in certain ideals and more importantly I trust he&#8217;ll keep his word which is more than I can say for 99% of politicians out there. But he does lay it on quite thick sometimes, probably because most people need that kind of show in order to get past stubborn preconceptions.<br />
As for your comments about Mitt, I can address a few further. I don&#8217;t think that anyone would disagree that what we need now is someone who can pare down our expenses and raise revenue enough to get us back in the black. Regardless of the fact of whether this is done in an internal entity (one you are actually a part of) or an external entity (one that you have bought and plan on selling), it is a valuable skill. Mitt has done this nearly his entire career. That he bought and then sold the companies he improved is really irrelevant. He will essentially perform the same necessary actions to return an entity to profitability internally in the government as he would have in a company he was preparing to sell. As for the long-term profitability of the companies he helped, take a look at Bain &amp; Co, Staples, Domino&#8217;s, Sealey, etc. If you look at the before and after of the market caps, profitability, stock prices (especially stock price because it is a market speculation of the company&#8217;s prospects), etc, then you will clearly see that these companies have been better off than they were before he touched them. I think you may be one of the only people that doubts Romney&#8217;s ability to turn companies around. You don&#8217;t make money at doing something if you&#8217;re not good at it.<br />
As far as starting out with capital to make more, of course you have a valid point; my point is that it doesn&#8217;t diminish his successes. He made something better out of what he had which is more than can be said for others who have inherited wealth. And as far as the government not having capital, the treasure is the ultimate source of capital. Where are we getting the trillions of dollars we are spending now? Borrowing and printing. The companies that Mitt improved weren&#8217;t loaded with capital when he took the helm &#8211; if they were, they wouldn&#8217;t have needed him. His genius is creating capital where others cannot. Applied to the federal government, the way our politicians are creating capital now is by printing it and we&#8217;re now seeing the first effects of that &#8211; our most recent inflation numbers are alarming. While that would certainly be needed in any administration, Romney&#8217;s ability to streamline (been proven time and time again) would minimize that need.<br />
Next: You can&#8217;t blame all of Massachusetts&#8217; problem on Romney. There is no question that he took a deficit and turned it into a surplus. He also did so without raising taxes, although you seem to think that fees are the same. Not true. Fees are associated with a particular use and are only levied on the user; taxes are broad based and are levied on everyone. To most fiscal conservatives, this system makes much more sense than not.<br />
Next: Romney&#8217;s job. To correct one of your statements, Romney NEVER wanted a McCain cabinet position. He stated that very clearly as he seen what others go through in those positions. He wanted the Presidency and it&#8217;s clear he would have loved to have been VP, but he never wanted a cabinet position. So if he doesn&#8217;t have a 9-to-5 job, it is most certainly by choice.<br />
It seems you&#8217;re most intent on finding reasons to dislike him instead of finding reasons to like him. I can&#8217;t think of anyone in this past race who had a more stellar economic record and a cleaner history. I may sound rather adulatory but it&#8217;s only because I can&#8217;t find much not to like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/02/24/not-this-doofus-again/#comment-48184</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=14783#comment-48184</guid>
		<description>And also, for clarification, I am definitely not a Democrat.  To me Ron Paul is the only true conservative I&#039;ve seen in the mix, although Bobby Jindal looks like he has some potential.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And also, for clarification, I am definitely not a Democrat.  To me Ron Paul is the only true conservative I&#8217;ve seen in the mix, although Bobby Jindal looks like he has some potential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/02/24/not-this-doofus-again/#comment-48183</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=14783#comment-48183</guid>
		<description>Rebecca:
Thanks for your insight.  I&#039;m sorry that my comments didn&#039;t make sense; would you let me know which of my facts are wrong so I can correct them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rebecca:<br />
Thanks for your insight.  I&#8217;m sorry that my comments didn&#8217;t make sense; would you let me know which of my facts are wrong so I can correct them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/02/24/not-this-doofus-again/#comment-48172</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=14783#comment-48172</guid>
		<description>Brian:
I&#039;m glad that you aren&#039;t voting for Mitt Romney just because he shares OUR same religion. Im Independent. If I were 18 and I could vote, i would vote for Romney based on his ideas for the Country&#039;s current situation.(In case ya&#039;ll are wondering, im 15.) I don&#039;t think Obama&#039;s idea of &quot;taking money from the rich people&quot; will help us right now. Your comment and bashing on Mitt Romney didn&#039;t make sense and by the way, all of your facts aren&#039;t correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian:<br />
I&#8217;m glad that you aren&#8217;t voting for Mitt Romney just because he shares OUR same religion. Im Independent. If I were 18 and I could vote, i would vote for Romney based on his ideas for the Country&#8217;s current situation.(In case ya&#8217;ll are wondering, im 15.) I don&#8217;t think Obama&#8217;s idea of &#8220;taking money from the rich people&#8221; will help us right now. Your comment and bashing on Mitt Romney didn&#8217;t make sense and by the way, all of your facts aren&#8217;t correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/02/24/not-this-doofus-again/#comment-48157</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=14783#comment-48157</guid>
		<description>Brad R.-

I appreciate you &quot;debunking&quot; my reasons for not liking him, but I&#039;m still not entirely convinced.
First, I actually do understand how businesses make profits.  It&#039;s not particularly complex: buy low, sell high.  It&#039;s what we do in my line of work, and we do pretty well at it.  Again, I have nothing against Mitt Romney for his line of work, but I don&#039;t see how his experience at Bain is relevant to the White House because he won&#039;t be buying up new entities and selling them to foreign nations.  While it&#039;s true that his ability to streamline, if actually valid, would be a great asset, I&#039;m not sure that the businesses he acquired and sold actually had better long-term profitability as a result of his involvement.  
Second, his family money is relevant only in that it gave him the necessary capital to start acquiring and selling businesses.  He certainly multiplied that money a great deal, but the amount of capital that currently doesn&#039;t exist in the federal budget is probably going to be a bit of a rude awakening to someone who is used to starting with a loaded ledger.  You do, I trust, understand the value of starting with capital.
Third, I think that my claim did make quite a bit of sense about his history as governor of Massachusetts.  Unemployment rose sharply during his tenure as governor, as did our budget deficit, as did our actual tax rates (Romney called them &quot;fee increases,&quot; but they took my money as effectively as any other tax raise I&#039;ve been under).  
Fourth: no, I don&#039;t think that Romney can get a job, at least not one that he wants.  I say this because he spent the last four years campaigning for the job he wanted, and then for VP, and then for a position in the McCain cabinet.  He was 0-3 on all of those counts.  I&#039;m sure that Romney could get a great job in industry somewhere, and, with his rhetoric, frankly it makes more sense for him to give up on the idea of being in government and go back to the private sector.  However, it seems like he wants to focus on elected govt. (despite his constant bashing of the size of government), and only having one rocky and brief term as governor where his policies changed dramatically (pro-gay rights to anti-gay marriage, pro-choice to pro-life, pro-amnesty to anti-illegal immigration) is not a great backdrop for a presidential run.  For his own sake, Romney needs a job someplace where he can show exactly what kind of a president he would be.  He was a great asset to Bain and to the Salt Lake Olympics, but neither of those positions really gave him a great platform to show what he would do as president.

And, last time I checked my head&#039;s not in the sand, but thanks for your concern.  I don&#039;t care whether or not it&#039;s typical for a Republican Mormon to like Romney; I only added the point about my religion so that I wouldn&#039;t be accused of anti-Mormonism just because I would prefer someone like Ron Paul to Mitt Romney.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad R.-</p>
<p>I appreciate you &#8220;debunking&#8221; my reasons for not liking him, but I&#8217;m still not entirely convinced.<br />
First, I actually do understand how businesses make profits.  It&#8217;s not particularly complex: buy low, sell high.  It&#8217;s what we do in my line of work, and we do pretty well at it.  Again, I have nothing against Mitt Romney for his line of work, but I don&#8217;t see how his experience at Bain is relevant to the White House because he won&#8217;t be buying up new entities and selling them to foreign nations.  While it&#8217;s true that his ability to streamline, if actually valid, would be a great asset, I&#8217;m not sure that the businesses he acquired and sold actually had better long-term profitability as a result of his involvement.<br />
Second, his family money is relevant only in that it gave him the necessary capital to start acquiring and selling businesses.  He certainly multiplied that money a great deal, but the amount of capital that currently doesn&#8217;t exist in the federal budget is probably going to be a bit of a rude awakening to someone who is used to starting with a loaded ledger.  You do, I trust, understand the value of starting with capital.<br />
Third, I think that my claim did make quite a bit of sense about his history as governor of Massachusetts.  Unemployment rose sharply during his tenure as governor, as did our budget deficit, as did our actual tax rates (Romney called them &#8220;fee increases,&#8221; but they took my money as effectively as any other tax raise I&#8217;ve been under).<br />
Fourth: no, I don&#8217;t think that Romney can get a job, at least not one that he wants.  I say this because he spent the last four years campaigning for the job he wanted, and then for VP, and then for a position in the McCain cabinet.  He was 0-3 on all of those counts.  I&#8217;m sure that Romney could get a great job in industry somewhere, and, with his rhetoric, frankly it makes more sense for him to give up on the idea of being in government and go back to the private sector.  However, it seems like he wants to focus on elected govt. (despite his constant bashing of the size of government), and only having one rocky and brief term as governor where his policies changed dramatically (pro-gay rights to anti-gay marriage, pro-choice to pro-life, pro-amnesty to anti-illegal immigration) is not a great backdrop for a presidential run.  For his own sake, Romney needs a job someplace where he can show exactly what kind of a president he would be.  He was a great asset to Bain and to the Salt Lake Olympics, but neither of those positions really gave him a great platform to show what he would do as president.</p>
<p>And, last time I checked my head&#8217;s not in the sand, but thanks for your concern.  I don&#8217;t care whether or not it&#8217;s typical for a Republican Mormon to like Romney; I only added the point about my religion so that I wouldn&#8217;t be accused of anti-Mormonism just because I would prefer someone like Ron Paul to Mitt Romney.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad R</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/02/24/not-this-doofus-again/#comment-48135</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=14783#comment-48135</guid>
		<description>Brian,

You obviously don&#039;t understand they way a business works or profits are made. Romney&#039;s money didn&#039;t just appear out of nowhere. He worked hard for that. Not impressive? You go out and make hundreds of millions of dollars and come back that you didn&#039;t work hard for it. If it wasn&#039;t impressive wouldn&#039;t everyone be making that kind of money? Right... And if you thinking that because his parents left him money diminishes his accomplishments then you&#039;re making excuses and digging real deep for some reason not to like him. 
His business of cleaning up companies and selling them is a healthy thing. He could either do nothing with them and let them die of naturally, or prune them to get rid of excess so that it may later flourish. It&#039;s the same principle used in gardening. What&#039;s wrong with that? And then you say that you don&#039;t have a problem with it - well then why would you use it as a talking point against him? You don&#039;t make sense. His experience is incredibly significant in the White House, especially in our current economic situation. We&#039;ve got a government that is in trouble with huge monetary losses - how does turning a business from being unprofitable to profitable not help with turning our current deficit government into a surplus government? Again, you&#039;re not making sense.
Leaving a worsened Massachusetts? Right, turning a huge deficit into a huge surplus is a lot worse. Third time that you haven&#039;t made sense.
Fourth? Mitt not having a job for the past few years. Do you think it&#039;s because he can&#039;t get one or needs one? Question: Why do you have a job? (I&#039;m assuming you have one) To provide for your family, right? Since he can already provide for his, he can focus on things he cares about more than making money, like advancing conservative ideals. Don&#039;t tell me that if you had the time and resources that you wouldn&#039;t contribute more of your resources on what you really care about. Again, you don&#039;t make sense.
So now that your reasons for not liking him have been debunked, you can pull your head out of the sand and stop disliking the guy simply because it would be too typical for a &quot;Republican Mormon&quot; to like him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian,</p>
<p>You obviously don&#8217;t understand they way a business works or profits are made. Romney&#8217;s money didn&#8217;t just appear out of nowhere. He worked hard for that. Not impressive? You go out and make hundreds of millions of dollars and come back that you didn&#8217;t work hard for it. If it wasn&#8217;t impressive wouldn&#8217;t everyone be making that kind of money? Right&#8230; And if you thinking that because his parents left him money diminishes his accomplishments then you&#8217;re making excuses and digging real deep for some reason not to like him.<br />
His business of cleaning up companies and selling them is a healthy thing. He could either do nothing with them and let them die of naturally, or prune them to get rid of excess so that it may later flourish. It&#8217;s the same principle used in gardening. What&#8217;s wrong with that? And then you say that you don&#8217;t have a problem with it &#8211; well then why would you use it as a talking point against him? You don&#8217;t make sense. His experience is incredibly significant in the White House, especially in our current economic situation. We&#8217;ve got a government that is in trouble with huge monetary losses &#8211; how does turning a business from being unprofitable to profitable not help with turning our current deficit government into a surplus government? Again, you&#8217;re not making sense.<br />
Leaving a worsened Massachusetts? Right, turning a huge deficit into a huge surplus is a lot worse. Third time that you haven&#8217;t made sense.<br />
Fourth? Mitt not having a job for the past few years. Do you think it&#8217;s because he can&#8217;t get one or needs one? Question: Why do you have a job? (I&#8217;m assuming you have one) To provide for your family, right? Since he can already provide for his, he can focus on things he cares about more than making money, like advancing conservative ideals. Don&#8217;t tell me that if you had the time and resources that you wouldn&#8217;t contribute more of your resources on what you really care about. Again, you don&#8217;t make sense.<br />
So now that your reasons for not liking him have been debunked, you can pull your head out of the sand and stop disliking the guy simply because it would be too typical for a &#8220;Republican Mormon&#8221; to like him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

