<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lindsey Graham On Nationalizing Banks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/02/16/lindsey-graham-on-nationalizing-banks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/02/16/lindsey-graham-on-nationalizing-banks/</link>
	<description>Politics, Sports and Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:48:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BIN News Editorial Staff</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/02/16/lindsey-graham-on-nationalizing-banks/#comment-47522</link>
		<dc:creator>BIN News Editorial Staff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=14223#comment-47522</guid>
		<description>sic(k) willie, 

You are so funny. You and your wackos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sic(k) willie, </p>
<p>You are so funny. You and your wackos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NRO Reader</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/02/16/lindsey-graham-on-nationalizing-banks/#comment-47487</link>
		<dc:creator>NRO Reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=14223#comment-47487</guid>
		<description>This the is same idea that National Review suggested last week.  Unfortunately, the choices appear to be useless &quot;Zombie&quot; banks like they had in Japan (where we keep pouring taxpayer dollars down the drain to no avail), nationalizing them for a period of time and then selling off smaller/healthier versions back to the private sector, or allowing the &quot;too big to fail&quot; banks to do just that -- fail.

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZjFhYTExN2JkZTA3NjVlMTVkZTA2ODJmMDdkNTI0ZGE=

From Rich Lowry at NRO:  &quot;We have learned that the uncontrolled collapse of an institution like Lehman Brothers is dangerous. Bankrupt banks that are truly â€œtoo big to failâ€ need to be taken over by the government, broken up until they are small enough to fail and sold off, with government eating their toxic assets for now. This kind of semi-nationalization can clear the decks for new, healthy banks that wonâ€™t be long-term wards of the government or long-term drags on growth.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This the is same idea that National Review suggested last week.  Unfortunately, the choices appear to be useless &#8220;Zombie&#8221; banks like they had in Japan (where we keep pouring taxpayer dollars down the drain to no avail), nationalizing them for a period of time and then selling off smaller/healthier versions back to the private sector, or allowing the &#8220;too big to fail&#8221; banks to do just that &#8212; fail.</p>
<p><a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZjFhYTExN2JkZTA3NjVlMTVkZTA2ODJmMDdkNTI0ZGE" rel="nofollow">http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZjFhYTExN2JkZTA3NjVlMTVkZTA2ODJmMDdkNTI0ZGE</a>=</p>
<p>From Rich Lowry at NRO:  &#8220;We have learned that the uncontrolled collapse of an institution like Lehman Brothers is dangerous. Bankrupt banks that are truly â€œtoo big to failâ€ need to be taken over by the government, broken up until they are small enough to fail and sold off, with government eating their toxic assets for now. This kind of semi-nationalization can clear the decks for new, healthy banks that wonâ€™t be long-term wards of the government or long-term drags on growth.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peanut</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/02/16/lindsey-graham-on-nationalizing-banks/#comment-47464</link>
		<dc:creator>Peanut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 06:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=14223#comment-47464</guid>
		<description>HEADLINE: â€œNaÃ¯ve Nancy Graham swept under rug like yesterdayâ€™s $20.00 trickâ€.

Nancy Graham is a fool. He has been busy with his fellow compromisers playing Mr. Moderate (&quot;let me split the difference, PLEASE?&quot;).  Now that these Lib fools  are in charge they sweep him under the rug like yesterdays $20.00 trick, which he could well have been had it not been his good fortune to have been born in the whacky place like we call South Carolina.

Terrible public policy (originating from Congress) got us in this mess, and Senator Nancy was there watching a lot of it. When he was not busy making deals with the libs, he was making his campaign 10 million bucks from those same lobbyist and special interest groups that he assisted along the way with his wheeling and dealing.

Nancy has done very well for himself while we have gotten the shaft. So I donâ€™t buy his little &quot;naÃ¯ve Nancy bitâ€â€¦had he cared about us he would have fought for us when he had some power.  Senator Nancyâ€™s real gripe is that the Left no longer needs him. Come to think of it, South Carolina has not needed him in quite a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HEADLINE: â€œNaÃ¯ve Nancy Graham swept under rug like yesterdayâ€™s $20.00 trickâ€.</p>
<p>Nancy Graham is a fool. He has been busy with his fellow compromisers playing Mr. Moderate (&#8220;let me split the difference, PLEASE?&#8221;).  Now that these Lib fools  are in charge they sweep him under the rug like yesterdays $20.00 trick, which he could well have been had it not been his good fortune to have been born in the whacky place like we call South Carolina.</p>
<p>Terrible public policy (originating from Congress) got us in this mess, and Senator Nancy was there watching a lot of it. When he was not busy making deals with the libs, he was making his campaign 10 million bucks from those same lobbyist and special interest groups that he assisted along the way with his wheeling and dealing.</p>
<p>Nancy has done very well for himself while we have gotten the shaft. So I donâ€™t buy his little &#8220;naÃ¯ve Nancy bitâ€â€¦had he cared about us he would have fought for us when he had some power.  Senator Nancyâ€™s real gripe is that the Left no longer needs him. Come to think of it, South Carolina has not needed him in quite a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cooter Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/02/16/lindsey-graham-on-nationalizing-banks/#comment-47453</link>
		<dc:creator>Cooter Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 05:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=14223#comment-47453</guid>
		<description>Dat&#039;s wha&#039; happins when ye send scalawags bak to Warshintun when ye KNOWS hes&#039;a damn turn-coat, sissy,scalawag toole of da &#039;publicrat socialissst sob&#039;s in powa-- dat&#039;s fixin&#039; t&#039; ram rod our hind quarters wit natshunalized ebery-damn-thang!
Git yer guns folks-- they&#039;s not eben pertendin&#039; annie moore....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dat&#8217;s wha&#8217; happins when ye send scalawags bak to Warshintun when ye KNOWS hes&#8217;a damn turn-coat, sissy,scalawag toole of da &#8216;publicrat socialissst sob&#8217;s in powa&#8211; dat&#8217;s fixin&#8217; t&#8217; ram rod our hind quarters wit natshunalized ebery-damn-thang!<br />
Git yer guns folks&#8211; they&#8217;s not eben pertendin&#8217; annie moore&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

