<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bravo, WaPo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/02/10/bravo-wapo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/02/10/bravo-wapo/</link>
	<description>Politics, Sports and Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:00:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mijeel</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/02/10/bravo-wapo/#comment-47115</link>
		<dc:creator>mijeel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=13785#comment-47115</guid>
		<description>Although I&#039;m white and a man, I&#039;m not angry. But I am pretty doggone outraged!

To call the President&#039;s &quot;Spending Bill&quot; Keynesian (or bipartisan, for that matter) is ridiculous. Trying to pass off the socialistic, pork-laden, government power play as stimulus is an intellectually and morally bankrupt argument. Government simply spending money (it doesn&#039;t have) does not equate to stimulus and to claim the bill is anything but social engineering is intellectually dishonest. Having no clue or confidence that it will have any stimulative effect whatsoever and foisting on future generations the invoice for yet another liberal experiment in socialism is just plain immoral. 

Few, if any, of the people sent to Washington to represent &quot;We the People&quot; have actually read and understood everything in the legislation which proposes to spend nearly a TRILLION dollars. In less than a week&#039;s time, the government has decided to spend more money than the cumulative debt amassed by the country between the Revolutionary War and the Carter Administration. If that isn&#039;t being intellectually bankrupt I don&#039;t know what is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I&#8217;m white and a man, I&#8217;m not angry. But I am pretty doggone outraged!</p>
<p>To call the President&#8217;s &#8220;Spending Bill&#8221; Keynesian (or bipartisan, for that matter) is ridiculous. Trying to pass off the socialistic, pork-laden, government power play as stimulus is an intellectually and morally bankrupt argument. Government simply spending money (it doesn&#8217;t have) does not equate to stimulus and to claim the bill is anything but social engineering is intellectually dishonest. Having no clue or confidence that it will have any stimulative effect whatsoever and foisting on future generations the invoice for yet another liberal experiment in socialism is just plain immoral. </p>
<p>Few, if any, of the people sent to Washington to represent &#8220;We the People&#8221; have actually read and understood everything in the legislation which proposes to spend nearly a TRILLION dollars. In less than a week&#8217;s time, the government has decided to spend more money than the cumulative debt amassed by the country between the Revolutionary War and the Carter Administration. If that isn&#8217;t being intellectually bankrupt I don&#8217;t know what is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red Bank Bar</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/02/10/bravo-wapo/#comment-47078</link>
		<dc:creator>Red Bank Bar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=13785#comment-47078</guid>
		<description>Awww, folks, still upset at FDR winning in &#039;32, are ya?

That argument&#039;s over, folks.  You lost miserably.  Keynes works, folks.  Tax cuts don&#039;t work, folks.  

Still intellectually AND morally bankrupt, folks.    Pimping for a regional party of angry white men is not becoming, folks.    Chao, folks, you&#039;re now irrelevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awww, folks, still upset at FDR winning in &#8217;32, are ya?</p>
<p>That argument&#8217;s over, folks.  You lost miserably.  Keynes works, folks.  Tax cuts don&#8217;t work, folks.  </p>
<p>Still intellectually AND morally bankrupt, folks.    Pimping for a regional party of angry white men is not becoming, folks.    Chao, folks, you&#8217;re now irrelevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

