Market Speculation Is So Last Year
From America’s inception, the country’s economy has operated on the concept of speculation – a method of prognostication based on applying the past to the future.
To “speculate,†in the business sense, has always been to predict an outcome with the benefit of history – a guided guess, but a guess nonetheless.
The American economy was built on these careful symbiotic semiotics – hindsight and foresight, and the dependent signs and symbols of both.
Until now.
Financial speculation has – like a transparent tranny – disappeared, undergone a sex change, and reemerged as ostensibly “the same on the inside†as before, asking us to ignore that it’s just not the same at all.
Speculation, and with it the entire economy, has become exactly the opposite of what it has been, the opposite of what’s worked all along.
Where before it was all about the future with a guiding eye towards the past, it’s now all about the present. There is almost no regard for the future, nor any deference to the past.
Not quite getting it yet?
Behold some headlines about stock market performance from the past couple of weeks:
“Stocks Mixed on Retail Newsâ€
“Wal-Mart Sends Dow Southâ€
“Stocks Plunge on Job Numbersâ€
“Dow Dips 81 on Autos, Buildingâ€
“Stocks Slide on Auto Fearsâ€
At first glance, these headlines probably look bland and benign, but it’s just that we’ve come to expect this sort of reactionary trading – trading that is, for the first time ever, contemporaneous with the news.
The markets plunge or soar with the news – not because of it, as conventional wisdom dictates, since financial cause-and-effect just doesn’t manifest with such immediacy.
In fact, there is no cause-and-effect at all, there’s only news and nearly simultaneous shotgun trades in response to that news.
It’s an intensely reactionary way to do business, doing away as it does with all manner of initiative, forethought, or – and this is not a small point – hindsight.
It’s no wonder the markets have so spectacularly sunk. Market speculation has no basis in reality anymore, because speculators refuse to speculate.
Instead they react to the days’ headlines with the distilled binarity of a robot: good/bad, buy/sell.
And that reaction leads, naturally, to another reaction – equal in severity and opposite to simplicity.
The name that particular reaction is given by the very people who caused it?
Financial Crisis.
And just the mention of that phrase – just the phrase, without regard to data or reality, analysis or elaboration – sends stocks plummeting.
Which is just my point.








Comments
By Daniel on January 10th, 2009 at 8:00 pm
“[T]rading that is, for the first time ever, contemporaneous with the news.”
Huh? This post reads like it was authored by someone from another planet. Have you never observed financial markets or news prior to the past year? Bizarre.
By Paul Kinfer on January 10th, 2009 at 11:22 pm
“In fact, there is no cause-and-effect at all, there’s only news and nearly simultaneous shotgun trades in response to that news.”
Aha–I get it now: There’s no cause and effect; there’s only news, which effects a response!
YAY LOGIC!
By FWFIV on January 11th, 2009 at 12:47 pm
How in the world can a sensible person read this and conclude it should see the light of day. Markets ALWAYS react to the current news of the day. For decades unemplyment reports have affected the stock market, just to name one example.
This is a lame attempt by mande to blame financial reporting for the economic meltdown and to diffuse the criticism she deserves for her previous articles touting our “strong” economy. For idealogical hacks like mande, shooting the messenger is their way of avoiding how wrong they were about the country’s economic situation.
By Mande Wilkes on January 11th, 2009 at 1:07 pm
FWFIV -
I’m not so derivative nor so deluded as to carry the “blame the media” torch. Nowhere do I even implicate the media, except insofar as I call out investors’ *reactions* to media reports. If this article is an indictment at all, it’s one against “the people” and not “the man.”
-Mande