The Dawson Question
We haven’t taken a position on the RNC committee chairman’s race because let’s face it, “Republicanism” is deader than a proverbial doornail at the moment, and none of the glad-handing buffoons tripping over each other to lead America’s most hypocritical party particularly appeals to us.
To a man, these party hacks represent an excuse for Republican activists to get excited over an election they can control for a change – nothing more, nothing less.
Bandying about ridiculous “blueprints” and “battle plans” that are long on rhetoric and short on reality, none of these Gomers is intelligent or intellectually honest enough to actually do what Republicans must do in order to regain relevancy – purge their party of RINO’s and rabid right wing evangelicals while returning to the fiscally conservative roots of Ronald Reagan.
Which leads us to SCGOP Chairman Katon Dawson – who is easily among the most nakedly ambitious politicians e’re to bestride the national stage.
While several Palmetto political websites are gushing over Dawson’s every move – ooh-ing and ahh-ing over his candidacy like it was their job (which it probably is), we’ve taken a wait-and-see approach.
Sure, we were counseled to endorse his candidacy early on by numerous South Carolina Republicans, but the fact is there are legitimate questions being raised concerning Dawson’s character and his financial management of the SCGOP, to say nothing of his stewardship of the Republican brand in South Carolina.
Specifically, what is Dawson’s real record?
Obviously, he likes to boast of holding the GOP line at a time when the national party is going under, but has he actually done that? And if so, what did he sacrifice in order to keep the SCGOP’s head above water?
Has Dawson succeeded in maintaining the “House That Campbell Built?” Or has he allowed it to be torn asunder by party-switchers and RINOs?
Is South Carolina really the “reddest state in the nation?” Or has the infusion of Democratic and fiscally-liberal blood contaminated the GOP’s heart and soul here?
Oh, and why are two of South Carolina’s most influential Republicans – Gov. Mark Sanford and U.S. Sen. Jim DeMint – declining to endorse Dawson in the Chairman’s race?
Answers to these and other questions could be found within the pages of a document provided exclusively to FITS that details several of Dawson’s financial (mis)dealings as well as other items of concern.
We’re still in the process of verifying some of the document’s more sinister claims, but thusfar everything it alleges regarding the SCGOP’s finances is checking out …
Stay tuned …







Comments
By frank on December 27th, 2008 at 1:55 pm
If he is anything like Senator Jakie Knotts, then hell NO!!!!! Mr Dawson can really do himself and the Republican party a favor and that is to publicly denounce the RINO’s by name starting with Jakie Knotts.
By No Names Here on December 27th, 2008 at 4:30 pm
I think Dawson is too entangled with those who would buddy-up to someone, endorse them even — and then do everything they could ruin them [e.g., T-Rav].
By No Names Here on December 27th, 2008 at 4:49 pm
You know, entangled with those like the one filming this little gem:
http://blogs.thestate.com/bradwarthensblog/2006/10/thomas_ravenel_.html
By Pres on December 27th, 2008 at 6:33 pm
Dawson is interested in Republicans winning. Thats it. It doesn’t matter if they are conservative or whatever, he wants to win. I’m more idealogical, thats why I support Ken Blackwell.
By Lexing-ton on December 27th, 2008 at 7:43 pm
TuneageMan is pulling a George Jones on us again, folks…I turn your musical ears to this classic favorite, on the CD my husband has either hid or cremated:
http://www.rhapsody.com/johnny-mathis/christmas-with-johnny-mathis
Listen to:
>>>A Marshmallow World
:)
By rick not Quinn on December 28th, 2008 at 1:47 am
Sanford does not what anyone from SC on the GOP national stage who may overshadow HIM. Its just that simple. He knows that we know all about him and a selection of one of us like Dawson would not give him (Sanfraud) a clearest of all shots to create a better national image. Sanfraud knows that Dawson would have to great ability to tell national reporters the story of the fake Sanford, which is also the story of the real Sanford.
By liz on December 28th, 2008 at 9:04 am
Republicans are losers anyway. Republicans: the party of hate and greed. Republicans: the party that divided America.
Who cares if they appoint Dawson? They haven’t got much.
Who cares if they run Sanford, because he is ” nice looking”, which seems to be why Republicans think they get elected….
Republicans- losers.
By rino rage on December 28th, 2008 at 11:49 am
What does Dawson believe in anyway? More wars, bigger deficits, more bailouts for their bank buddies?? Does he have a real plan on how to pollute the planet faster than George W.?
We need folks who can solve real world problems -not win elections on fear mongering and smears and increase the size of the predator state .
Go away Dawson and give it up – the gig is over.
By LC on December 28th, 2008 at 4:48 pm
I thank the kind Yankees that are going to save us from this Dawson madness. It won’t be a Southerner driving that RNC train. Why, I bet Mitt Romney is wheeling and dealing right now as we speak. He can fix everything, you know.
…
What about this guy?
http://www.msa.md.gov/msa/mdmanual/08conoff/html/msa13921.html
Hot, nice tan, not a rabid right-winger, all that good stuff.
By liz is smart on December 28th, 2008 at 7:15 pm
Liz- it’s quite obvious that you’re very intelligent.
Liz: big ideas.
By Silence the Noise on December 29th, 2008 at 12:02 am
Katon Dawson…..never gonna happen. His reign of terror….much like that of Bobby Big Government Harrell….is quickly coming to an end.
By frank on December 29th, 2008 at 9:38 am
Katon worships power, money and glory. He is the poster child for a failed party, one that looks after itself but fails the people.
If he is elected chairman, it will signal a true change in the future of our country…and change that the GOP can’t or won’t change its ways.
………I have always thought there was something funny about the SC GOP books. Please tell us more.
By HCB on December 30th, 2008 at 12:45 pm
Purge the rabid right wing evangelicals, eh? I don’t happen to be one of them, but I’ve heard this so often in the past few weeks, I’m convinced it’s folly. It’s certainly unusual to hear you, Will, repeat a mainstream-media talking point.
To quote Ramesh Ponnuru’s comment in National Review, “In 2002 and 2004, Republicans ran hard on social issues and the courts — and scored victories at every level of politics. In 2006 and 2008, they left those issues off the table, and got walloped. It follows, naturally, that the social issues are to blame for the Republican defeats.”
(By the way, that’s irony, for those of you who were educated in South Carolina public schools.)
By Judy on January 13th, 2009 at 2:12 am
I am a Yankee (from Chicago), but I also support Katon for RNC Chair. I think he can win elections. It looks to me like has been pretty successful in South Carolina and could bring that success to the national stage. A 50-state strategy would require a Chairman that could see that different states or areas need different types of candidates or just leave it, as his plan states, to the states. He is also correct that we do not need another insider running the RNC.