Comments on: There’s Something About Aniston

By: AJAX

AJAX — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:07:44 +0000

Brad is one lucky man :D !!!

By: Violary

Violary — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:15:53 +0000

Haha ^^ nice, is there a section to follow the RSS feed

By: Tim

Tim — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 19:49:30 +0000

I am so tired of seeing that Ugly Freakin’ mug of Jennifer Aniston on every damn magazine at the store that I could SCREAM! She is incredibly ugly. Tiny, tiny eyes- a chin you could dig a ditch with. Just beyond plain- she’s ugly. Hell, I see so many chicks on the street that are way, way hotter and I’m sure much more talented and interesting than this stupid bitch. Why do we have to keep looking at her ugly ass???? I wish she would just go away. No talent, boring and ugly. End of story-

By: sclawyerIII

sclawyerIII — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:32:46 +0000

Do you guys have original thoughts or does it all generate from What Would Tyler Durden Do?

By: nope

nope — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:50:58 +0000

And if Mande does get paid for this, I want in. Apparently it doesn’t matter if you have nothing to say, and then say it really, really badly.

By: nope

nope — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:49:37 +0000

And yet, look at all of you. You’re writing and writing and writing. As if it mattered.

By: Jane Doe

Jane Doe — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 21:46:56 +0000

You hit the nail squarely on the head. Jennifer Aniston is a non-entity. Her movies are bland. Her “sexy” photos are a scream for help. She’s not sexy, not beguiling, not interesting, and is just so plain Jane that it’s unbelievable that anyone would want to stalk her to get a picture. Yes, her latest pics in GQ show off a nice body, but that’s all she has to offer anyone. If she weren’t naked, nobody would notice her body because she doesn’t know how to dress. She’s just absolutely awkward in everything. She’s the same in every movie. I don’t get why people care. I really don’t.

By: Gen. Longstreet

Gen. Longstreet — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:45:37 +0000

I, too, am a fan of Jen’s. I asked her to be one of my Yahoo Friends and an “automatic reply” came back saying she was considering it!

By: Bess

Bess — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:55:33 +0000

To memyself&I,

I lost you, and yet you’re challenging my point? Okay hon, consistency and comprehension is a mark of any good debater, hon – try to get some.

…and uh, HELLO – ‘Marriage to BRAD PITT,’ is what makes an unknown famous, and it is also what makes the least talented, least attractive, and least critically recognized female cast member on a hackneyed new TV sit-com, super famous. I’m not saying she wouldn’t be famous or a celebrity, I’m just saying she’d be Patricia Heaton…or..heh..Courtney Cox. Your Thornton and Miller examples wouldn’t apply, as they didn’t get hitched to ‘Brad Pitt.’ I imagine if they had, they would be more famous than they are, and perhaps Eli Stone would not have been cancelled. Paltrow didn’t marry Pitt either, but being his girlfriend sure put her squarely on the map as well. How do I know this? Simple math: the first I had ever heard of her, she was getting mega-press on a wide-scale for just for THAT alone – and also, she may have even said it herself. I know a hell of a LOT of people did. A basic way to determine and bring home my point. Would we be here, on some obscure blog/message board talking about this woman if not for Brad Pitt..? I know I wouldn’t, as I happened to get here through A LINK FROM A THREAD ON…(wait for it)…BRAD PITT. I submit if Aniston had married David Schwimmer in real life, or Ray Romano, NONE OF US, would be here. When in doubt. Do the very VERY simple math people. That is all.

By: memyself&I

memyself&I — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:41:03 +0000

To Besse: You lost us at “in this case”

To ,,,,,: If Jennifer wasn’t on Friends there would have been no Friends. If marriage is what makes a person why isn’t anyone talking about Billy Bob Thorton or Johny Lee Miller? How come no one cares about Gwyneth Paltrow?