All Ports, All The Time
With container traffic at the Port of Charleston slipping at an alarming rate, tensions are unusually high at the S.C. State Ports Authority (SPA) these days.
Declining numbers, the potential loss of its largest client and a legislative proposal to disband its board are among the headaches facing the agency this Christmas season – and are all stories we’ll have more on in the coming days.
Let’s start with the obvious – business isn’t exactly booming at the port these days.
Between July and November of this year, container traffic is down 4.4% compared with the same time last year. Last month, however, the numbers fell by 13% compared to last November – a sign that the national recession is beginning to sink its teeth into an operation that wasn’t exactly setting the world on fire in the first place.
In fact, if the gradual erosion of the Port of Charleston’s competitive position during good economic times is any indication, we can’t wait to see how these Marxist-Leninsts handle a prolonged economic downturn.
Sadly, we may not have to wait that long, as based on what we’re hearing SPA leadership is already handling it in the worst possible way.
SPA officials have effectively forced their largest client “between a rock and a hard place,” at least that’s what we’re being told by sources familiar with the negotiations between port officials, labor bosses and Maersk-Sealand, which is responsible for 25% of the container traffic that passes through the port each year.
In fact, Maersk is reportedly close to leaving Charleston altogether, which would be a tremendous blow to the state’s economy.
Having already lost considerable ground to our neighboring states in the years leading up to the recession, South Carolina simply cannot afford to have Maersk bolt.
More on that later …
In the meantime, the SPA is dealing with a new bill drafted by former House Majority Leader Jimmy Merrill that would eliminate the agency’s board and divest its authority into a Cabinet-level director.
What this change intends to accomplish is unclear, however.
South Carolina’s governors already have exclusive appointment power over the SPA board, which as we’ve noted in the past is a rare executive control that has been tragically squandered by S.C. Gov. Mark Sanford.
Specifically, Sanford appointed a prominent fundraiser to run the board but then balked at removing him when it became clear that this longtime political gadfly, Columbia businessman Bill Stern, did not share Sanford’s free market approach to port management.
In fact, as far as we can tell Merrill’s bill fits the whole “deck chairs on the Titanic” expression better than any piece of legislation we’ve seen in some time … which is saying a lot in a state like South Carolina.
Anyway, needless to say we’ll be following all of these stories closely over the days and weeks to come …






Comments
By BIN News Editorial Staff on December 17th, 2008 at 12:17 am
sic(k) willie,
There you goe again with the “deck chairs on the Titanic.” What cr@p! Please hire some creative writers. You pretend to be knowledgeable on SPA issues, but your knowledge is as thin as your credibility. You know. Like toilet paper.
BIN News Editorial Staff
Flair and Balanced
By GetBusy@BIN.com on December 17th, 2008 at 1:41 am
Crap, Bin. You fell off the w@gon again.
By Gen. Longstreet on December 17th, 2008 at 9:12 am
What in hell is the “Titanic”?
By BIN News Editorial Staff on December 17th, 2008 at 10:01 am
r(e)member….I’m g@y!!!
sic(k)….keepin it real always….
BIN News Editorial Staff
Flair and Balanced
By SPA -socialism in action on December 17th, 2008 at 12:08 pm
There is only one thing to do when volume is rapidly declining and you are a state agency operating at 50% of your current capacity. Build another terminal and make it the most expensive one in the nation and build it without rail access- an expensive two legged stool !!!!
Rep. Merrill sounds like he is taking a page from the Obama playbook – instead of a car czar – appoint a port czar. If Merrill is a true Republican , I am Frosty the Snowman.
Merrill is head of the port legislative delegation- but he has done nothing to improve our port economics and seems to be a puppet of port management.
Why not let the free market try to work? – Lease out our existing terminals to private companies and judge port performance on real dollars going into our state Treasury. Our port is supposed to be an asset- yet it is a drain on our state budget- with a proposed road to the new terminal we obviously don’t need going to cost state taxpayers over $150 million dollars.
You can rest assured nothing will change – we will have the same inept port management – and build another terminal we do not need and can not afford as our economy implodes .
By Tradd on December 17th, 2008 at 12:19 pm
Look at how much Savannah and Norfolk have spent upgrading their rail systems. The future of ports can be found on railways, railways that SC has not invested in. One trip over the 526 bridge shows you how bad the trucks from Wando have destroyed that new road. Without investing in rail, SC will be left in the dust. Instead of destroying a neighborhood to build a road that will just add traffic to the already congested I-26, not to mention the pollution aspect of the argument; SC should invest, as other states are currently doing, in the already in place rail lines that can quickly and efficiently carry the work of dozens of trucks. However, I’m sure that Merrill’s bill is just a stump to get his name out and about for his political future. If that’s the case, then it looks like we can sit around and watch as our only economic assets floats away.
By flipnut on December 18th, 2008 at 12:38 am
Hey, at least we’re not NC who won;t come up with $500k to do the site survey for the NC International terminal.
Losing Maersk is no big deal, they suck, and suck hard. Charleston and Savannah are so close that it really doesn’t matter which port a container comes into anywats, the rate is about the same, and the trucking cost is within $75 to the door anywhere in the south east.
Losing regional DC’s to VA or GA is another matter.