Inside The Sellout
Earlier this year, we spoke with newly-elected S.C. Rep. Tim Scott after news broke of a major academic testing scandal down in his neck of the woods in Charleston, S.C.
He gave us some great quotes about these schools offering “false hope” to parents and students, and said he was interested in using his new position to bring some pressure to bear on the education establishment down there.
Nothing ever came of Scott’s promise, though, and in all honesty we had forgotten about the whole conversation until last week, when the S.C. House of Representatives convened for what should have been a routine organizational session.
It turned out to be anything but.
Very quickly, the week disintegrated into an all-out assault on government transparency as well as a petty,personal vendetta launched by House Speaker Bobby Harrell against a pair of fiscally conservative lawmakers whose only crime was speaking up for something they believe in.
Well, speaking up and permitting the governor to join them at a series of press conferences back in September to support their open government legislation.
Anyway, while Harrell was meting out his middle school … sorry, pre-school revenge against Reps. Nikki Haley and Nathan Ballentine, he was also rewarding those lawmakers who helped him pull off the playground coup.
For example … Tim Scott, who helped steer several key votes Harrell’s way and in return for his obedience was the only freshman lawmaker to be given a seat on the coveted House Labor, Commerce and Industry Committee. Incidentally, Scott’s sellout also helped pave the way for this guy to become Chairman of that committee, which we’re sure will make for some interesting discussions on race relations when lawmakers reconvene in January.
Not to mention some abysmal public policy.
Anyway, we had incredibly high hopes for Scott, but now we’re left with three troubling possibilities as to why he sold out everything he campaigned on within an hour of taking his oath of office.
Behind door number one is perhaps the scariest possibility – that everything this guy ran on was utter and complete bullsh*t, and that in his heart of hearts he’s really a Bobby Harrell Democrat who’s going to stick it to the taxpayers every chance he gets. We find it hard to believe someone would go as far out in support of conservative ideas as Scott did during his campaign, but it’s not like we haven’t seen it happen before.
Behind door number two is a theory advanced by our friends over at The Palmetto Scoop. This theory holds that Scott is an extraordinarily savvy politician who simply played the game better than others to get what he wanted. Sadly, while the juice may have been worth the squeeze for him on an individual level, he still empowered a corrupt legislative leader to inflict some lasting damage on the conservative cause.
More importantly, how do you trust a guy like that to protect the taxpayers moving forward? After all, there’s always another rung on the ladder, right? And who knows what he’ll cast aside the next time he decides to put himself first.
Behind door number three lies the possibility that Scott is really naive enough to be played by Harrell, although we highly doubt that is the case. We’ve actually had several conversations with him over the last few days and it’s pretty clear to us that he knew exactly “which end was up” throughout this whole process.
Whichever door you choose to explain Scott’s decisions, however, there’s disappointment waiting behind it.
As for Scott’s newly-elected colleagues, sources tell us that on the alleged “litmus test” vote of the session, Reps. Rita Allison, Derham Cole, Mike Forrester, Deborah Long, Joey Millwood, Steve Parker, Tommy Stringer and Bill Wylie all showed a willingness to stand up to Harrell’s machinations, although there’s some debate as to that vote’s true significance.
Either way, it goes without saying that several freshman joined Rep. Scott in punking out (at least initially) on the conservative beliefs they campaigned on, which ironically makes passing a comprehensive roll call voting bill even more critical this year.
We simply cannot allow these people to keep saying they’re for one thing and voting in secret for something else.
Also, we’d also like to send a special “punk out” award to fourth-term Rep. Jeff Duncan, who practically cuddled Harrell’s balls over the last few weeks to make sure that absolutely nothing jeopardized his ascension to the chairmanship of the House Agriculture Committee.
Well, now that you got what you wanted, Mr. Chairman, our advice to you would be to “stop stroking and start squeezing.”
Also earning a “punk out” is Beaufort Rep. Shannon Erickson, who has always talked a good game but for whatever reason seems to be there for Harrell whenever he needs her. In fact, we heard from more than a few people that she was shedding crocodile tears after completing her “fluffer apprenticeship” with the Speaker.
So who else is on Team Bobbycrat?
Well, we all know Majority Leader Kenny “Slick” Bingham, Jimmy “Two Face” Merrill and Annette “Dewar’s” Young represent the chief lieutenants in the Harrell mafia, and certainly Reps. Dan Cooper, Brian White, Joan Brady, Chip Limehouse and several others are so deep in Harrell’s pockets we might as well call them his “lint monkeys.”
Make no mistake, this will be the leadership team that attempts to shove a socialist jobs plan (and God only knows what other big government bullsh*t) down our throats this coming year.
Who will stand against them (and stand up for your wallet)?
Only time will tell.
As for Rep. Scott, he asked us to judge him on his record moving forward.
To which we can only say, “count on it.”







Comments
By GnuBerry on December 8th, 2008 at 4:12 am
The only real republicans are Will Folks and Nikki Haley.
By Wow. on December 8th, 2008 at 4:41 am
But sometimes, man you have to get along to go along. There have been mistakes by republican leaders who immediately buck all leadership, and they are put in the dog house for it. Then there are others who compromise on some issues, and by compromising in some ways, they are able to enact true reform. You have to pick your battles. Some Republican leaders should learn this.
This is however different from compromising all of your principles to get along. But giving on some issues is not a bad thing. Just when you allow that giving to transform you from the candidate that was elected is when problems arise. Mr. Scott campaigned on representing his constituents and doing their bidding in Columbia. And if he immediately comes in trying to buck the leadership, he would have ultimately been thrown in the doghouse from the outset, and would not have been able to serve his constituents in the House like he can by working with The Speaker on some issues.
By fitsnews on December 8th, 2008 at 5:08 am
Waits!!! Y’all forgots some peeps. Err no, maybe not.
Damn y’allz is ups late. Circadian rhythm? Is y’alls the screen the blinding light? Is y’alls the screen? Do y’alls work s at night? Don’t wake us … wee-ooo-wee-ooo.
Look, even lefty Michael Stipe once said “this machine can only swallow money.”
And he may not have been talking about SC government, but we are. And ya know what? All we’re tryin’ to do is keep some money in people’s pockets and keep the government spendin’ only what it needs (fir a change). And f’shnizzle our nizzles. Seriously, word to the mother.
The ocean machine is set to nine. The Sidewinder Sleeps tonight. And we can always sleeps standin’ up.
Somebody grab the coffee.
By Randy on December 8th, 2008 at 9:59 am
Looking at the situation this has turned into a very real debate. Do you go along to get along, get committee assignments, do as you are told all in hopes of one day having power as it apprears Scott is doing OR do you try and push sound public policy from the beginning regardless of the challenges or punishments that the status quo puts before you as Haley has done. I personally want to know that my legislator is willing to work to make a difference from Day 1. The longer you are there the more corrupt in the system you seem to get. We need these Freshman using the energy they have now to make a difference, not getting a committee assignment. That committee assignment that Scott had to “play the game” to get from Harrell didn’t benefit his constituents only showed that he is playing politics as usual.
By Silence the Noise on December 8th, 2008 at 10:16 am
Some conversations have been had recently on other blogs…..and a great point was brought up that bears repeating.
Tim Scott did not recieve a single vote to even be nominated as T-Rav’s sucessor.
That alone proves that the very same leadership who played him before is playing him again.
The racist, sexist leadership of the house had to have their token in the all white club……
Infuriating.
By Donnie Bracoe on December 8th, 2008 at 11:02 am
Tim Scott was going to LCI regardless…he’s the first black Republican since who knows when and is being treated with kid gloves…plus he knows how to play the game. All this is because he didn’t vote for Ballentine for Ethics….and for that he’s abandoned the “conservative” cause?
By Adam Fogle on December 8th, 2008 at 12:10 pm
“But sometimes, man you have to get along to go along.”
Exactly.
Will, I see where you are coming from. But tell me, is it better to not give an inch and lose all power thus rendering you completely ineffective, or give a little, gain power, and become effective?
By A couple of questions... on December 8th, 2008 at 12:11 pm
Can someone please explain Tim’s sin? Is it just that he didn’t vote for Ballentine for Ethics? Who did he vote for instead? I mean, they’ve only voted on one thing so far, right? Is doing what Haley and Ballentine want the new litmus test for what it means to be a good conservative? How did that happen? And diodn’t Duncan rate above them both on the ClubfGrowth ratings?
By WMD on December 8th, 2008 at 12:12 pm
Look at Sic(KKK)’s response!@! At five o’clock in the morning he is awake and very clearly under the influence of a controlled substance or some alcohol.
Which is it, Sic(KKK)?
And YES, reader you are so right. It is beyond time for these lawmakers to stand up to this bully the way that Ashley Smith did and tell him that enough is enough.
Sic(KKK) does nothing but threaten and go off half-coked whenever Nikki Haley or the Governor tell him to. Sic(KKK) forgets that Bobby Harrell made relationships with members and is all about getting things done. That is something the Sics, Nikkis and Sanfords of SC will never be able to do because all they care about is seeing their name up in lights.
Bobby Harrell did not “play” any one, there was never a “litmus test” vote and Shannon Erickson? She is a strong voice for Beaufort who stands up for her constituents and gets things done. Sic(KKK) why not stop “beating” women for a change?
By HP on December 8th, 2008 at 1:12 pm
Surely that is an impostor @ 5 A.M.?
I just finished a great book, “The Sociopath Next Door.” It should be required reading for all new SC House members. The veteran members could probably write a sequel, “The Sociopathic Speaker.”
Point: Don’t bargain, banter, or beat around the bush with one.
By baker on December 8th, 2008 at 3:41 pm
The political scene in this state really is very strange. Will is accusing Bobby Harrell of undermining conservatism and being essentially a Democrat (”Bobbycrat”).
But during the recent campaign, a PAC Harrell controls sent out misleading campaign literature attacking Democrats in certain races as being “liberal” wanting to “double your property taxes,” and so on. And Will says Harrell is out to push things to the left?! Of course, it was these Democrats’ concerns about Act 388 that was the basis of the Harrell PAC mailer — though even the arch-conservative Policy Council, if I’m not mistaken, has said Act 388 is a problem.
So, things really are upside down and twisted around: You’ve got a right-wing blogger accusing Harrell of being too liberal; but Harrell worked against Democrats during the campaign, using the “so-and-so’s too liberal” line; but Harrell’s attack was on the basis of these Democrats’ having some of the same concerns as conservatives about our tax structure.
Very strange. Maybe this state needs a viable two-party system to help sort things out.
By nope on December 8th, 2008 at 4:18 pm
I am definitely for the viable two-party system idea.
By Philip Branton on December 8th, 2008 at 4:20 pm
Tim’s ..SIN.?? Tim’s SIN..?? Geez…take a look at what happened on the Charleston County Council …ALONE?!?! Talk about getting in a staged slinging match to pimp votes..(SSS fire)!! To beat ALL…has he said ONE peep about the raping of Cherokee County by the Peeler tri-fecta..?? Has he said squat publicly about the Raping of the Pee Dee by Santee “Sandanista” Cooper..!! There are SOLUTIONS to these issues that a TRUE leader would stand UP on…!!! If his drivers lic. says South Carolina…he better start ACTING like it…!!! Has he said squat to the SC-ETV workers that the Legislature has hung out to dry…!! Has he been down to DHEC to pound on a few DESKS…!!! Check out a few landfill PERMITS..?? Does he care about the people in PARKER’s FERRY or ADAMS RUN..??? What about the Wildlife Habitat award for Waste Management…??!?! Well….I guess we will see just what type of ACTION he will take…!
By Insider on December 8th, 2008 at 10:47 pm
While we’re on the topic of Representatives Kenny Bingham and Shannon Erickson. It was Bingham, the Republican Majority Leader, that put the pressure on Shannon and OTHERS to vote against…a Republican for Ethics, so Laurie Funderbirk, a Democrat, would win. That’s how you play the game? You slit your own wrist in hopes of making an impression. You’re off to a great start Bingham!!! The Dems will have the House in two years!!
By BIN News Editorial Staff on December 9th, 2008 at 1:13 am
Although our staff is phillo-slopic-ally aligned with “MWD” to a certain degree, we are starting to wonder if he needs a tune up. His “KKK” stuff is too strong.
sic(k) willie is an equal opportunity racist. He hates everyone. BIN News will continue to monitor this developing situation from Maurice’s. Goooood BBQ!!
BIN News Editorial Staff
Flair and Balanced