Inside Your Government’s Pyramid Scheme
By now, we’re used to government officials spewing meaningless drivel in an attempt to separate taxpayers from their money.
It’s pretty much par for the course in South Carolina, which continues to lurch leftward by leaps and bounds as our state’s “Republican” leaders seek total government control over economic development in this state.
In fact, ever since their latest adventure in socialism was unveiled, we’ve been eagerly awaiting the particulars behind all the “pyramids, pillars and pipelines” of government intrusion endorsed by House Speaker Bobby Harrell, Senate Finance Chairman Hugh Leatherman, Senate President Glenn McConnell and House Ways & Means Chairman Dan Cooper.
Seriously, other than duplicating the economic development efforts of the S.C. Department of Commerce and siphoning money from entrepreneurial start-ups, what exactly does this highfalutin “Knowledge Sector Council” plan on doing?
Believe it or not, this “Bolshevik Blueprint” actually exceeded our wildest expectations … at least in terms of the sheer audaciousness and absurdity of the bullshit they’re trying to pass off as “economic development.”
According to the minutes of the group’s organizational session (held in September at a swanky private club in downtown Columbia), these “Knowledge Sector Council” clowns are far dumber – and yet far more dangerous – than we ever anticipated.
“The original high-level concept for the Knowledge Sector Council is to increase teamwork and outcomes between organizations involved in Knowledge Economy development through expanded awareness and communications,” says S.C. Research Authority President Bill Mahoney, who led this meeting of the socialist minds.
Wait … come again?
If you type that mumbo-jumbo into your handy-dandy “Bureaucratic Translator,” you’ll find that what Mahoney actually said was that a bunch of overpaid state employees are getting together to better coordinate ripping you off.
Of course, before venturing into such an exciting discussion, Mahoney felt it necessary to provide a little background on the group, which is basically a carbon copy of the University-controlled S.C. Research Authority (SRCA):
Prior to SCRA’s Executive Committee retreat on May 21, ’08, SCRA fielded a request from the State Legislative leadership to create a simple (brief text and visuals) model of the Knowledge Economy. The request was expressed with a very open ended requirement, but it was generally understood that the model would be utilized to communicate about the Knowledge Economy.
During its meeting on May 21st, the SCRA Executive Committee reviewed initial versions of text and visuals for the model that were being prepared for the Legislative leaders. At about this same time, it became clear that the Legislative leadership intended to use the model in an open letter to economic development principals across the state, calling for the formation of a Knowledge Sector Council. It also became clear that the Legislature was asking SCRA to lead this formation, due in part to SCRA’s collaboration management business model, and in part due to its execution of the SC Launch program.
That language is particularly ironic, because an “execution” is precisely what befell the SC Launch program earlier this year, when Mahoney and his SCRA goons deprived this S.C. entrepreneurial fund of about $8 million so they could ostensibly fund additional higher ed spending.
That’s a double-tap to the back of the head, people … mob-style.
Anyway, as if we had any doubt that this whole thing is nothing more than an elaborate scheme to pump more money into our research universities, Mahoney makes it perfectly clear who’s going to be in charge of the operation:
The VP’s of Research from Clemson, USC, and MUSC have been meeting quarterly with the SCRA CEO since June of 2007. This regular collaboration has resulted in significantly increased transparency, cooperation, and shared results between those organizations. This group has named itself “the 4 Officer Team.â€
Awww … how cute. They’ve got a name for themselves.
In fact, naming stuff seems to be epidemic among this group, like the whole “innovation pipeline” thing.
From whence such genius?
Bill Mahoney explained that the Innovation Pipeline visual was inspired by President Jim Barker (CU).
Ahhh … good to know.
In fact, we’ll keep Barker in mind the next time one of our founding editor’s bowel movements needs to be described as a “Cable of Competitiveness.”
But what’s truly scary about this plan isn’t all the stupid names, or the fact that these taxpayer-funded, six-figure salaried blowhards are sitting around stroking each other’s “pipelines.”
The real danger is the recklessness lurking just beneath the ridiculousness.
As noted in yesterday’s Greenville News, for example, these jokers actually want to raid the S.C. retirement fund and bypass state procurement code so they can erect additional monuments to government-sponsored incompetence.
These unheard of proposals evidently evolved out of this group’s frustration with “a regulated approval process with regard to capital and leases” and “lack of significant bond financing options.”
They call it “more efficient capital allocation.” We call it a death sentence for South Carolina taxpayers.
Make no mistake what’s happening here, people.
This group is saying that nobody in the private sector will support its plans financially but that South Carolina taxpayers should be put on the hook for the costs associated with its grandiose visions – with no accountability whatsoever.
In other words, let’s hand over the keys to our economy to the same idiots who have been running it into the ground for years … and then make sure that there’s absolutely no way we can monitor what they’re doing with all that money.
Hitting the nail on the head perfectly, here’s what S.C. Policy Council President Ashley Landess told the Greenville News about such an entity:
“Underneath all the fluffy, incomprehensible rhetoric is a very dangerous plan,” she said. “If it was just a bunch of bureaucrats sitting in a room entertaining themselves with pyramids and pipelines and pillars and taking credit for visuals, that would be one thing. This is way past that. They want to invest the people’s retirement, they want to build more buildings and waive the procurement code.”
Oh … and how will we know whether or not this Soviet-style “Command and Control” apparatus is even working?
According to the group’s own discussion of relevant “metrics,” we won’t.
That’s because not surprisingly, none of these government pencil-pushers has even the foggiest conception of what running a successful “Knowledge Sector Council” entails – certainly not when it comes to producing actual results:
No consensus was reached as to the measurement for knowledge economy success, since it was agreed that individual metrics have skews and dependencies which could make them misleading, or unachieveable. Selecting or designing metrics raises challenges because there are so many indices and surveys already in existence. There was agreement that each participant needed to measure and communicate about metrics of importance to their portion of the innovation pipeline. Those metrics should be in terms meaningful to average citizens and to politicians.
So to recap … these morons have no idea what they want to achieve, or even if it can be achieved, but they agree it’s essential to “communicate importance” to citizens and politicians.
Good God.
One thing is clear, however. The “Knowledge Sector Council” holds out little hope for the hundreds of thousands of children trapped in our state’s equally inefficient (and expensive) K-12 education system, which in case you’ve forgotten boasts the worst graduation rate in the entire country.
The knowledge economy may not be able to help the 700,000 or so high school dropouts in the state find employment, but it might help that population somewhat by addressing health disparities.
Wow … we’re not experts or anything, but somehow the promise of “somewhat addressing health disparities” doesn’t sound to us like it’s going to do a whole helluva lot for all those discarded souls that the educrats claim to care so much about.
Guess the government’s commitment “to the children” exists only so far as it can draw down government funds under the illusion of educating them.
Once they’ve relegated generations of these kids to minimum wage jobs, Y-O-Y-O, people.
Here’s some free advice for all of these government clowns … capitalism.
Yeah, we know … it’s a foreign concept these days, but businesses actually do go where they’re wanted, and the best way to bring high-paying knowledge sector jobs to South Carolina is to dramatically lower our tax burden, reform our abysmal regulatory and legal climates, get rid of excess government (not create more of it) and try some market-based education and health care reform for a change.
The very last thing we need to do is give these government goons a blank check to go and buy a bigger wrecking ball.
Seriously, people. Of all the harebrained schemes ever conjured up by our state’s totally bass-ackwards, borderline retarded government, this is by far the most dangerous and potentially-debilitating for our citizens.
It’s incompetence on steroids. Insanity on parade. An invitation to government corruption and waste on an unprecedented scale.
Without exaggeration, the plan put forth by this so-called “Knowledge Sector Council” needs to be stabbed in its heart … repeatedly … until it is no longer breathing.
Below is the “Bolshevik Blueprint” in its entirety … and while we don’t play this card often, we actually hope you’re pissed off enough after reading it to call your lawmaker and make damn sure they’re not supporting this in any way, shape or form.
If they are, you should not only tell them that they’ve lost your vote … you should immediately file the paperwork to run against them.














Comments
By BIN News Editorial Staff on December 1st, 2008 at 12:56 am
sic(k) willie, take a hint from Reader’s Digest. Never write 10th grade cr@p that takes longer than the average cr@p to read. Your rants are getting too long for the average trip to the loo. And you’ve become boring.
BIN News Editorial Staff
Flair and Balanced
By WMD on December 1st, 2008 at 1:06 am
Right on, BIN. Sic(k) has gotten very boring and this latest rant is talentless as well.
He is getting paid under the table by someone and my money is on Governor Mark Sanford or the SC Policy Council and those right wing wack jobs from Sticky Fingers.
By angelina on December 1st, 2008 at 1:27 am
My, my, BIN and WMD — you legislative hack jobs are up awfully late! The Speaker probably pulled you out of your matching bunk beds and told you to get busy defending his original high level concept and the 4 Officers Team. As for the “10th Grade level,” that’s actually a little higher than most of our high school seniors, and much higher than the 700,000 who will be “eating cake” in the knowledge sector council metrical pyramid. If Sic Wil is getting paid under the table (or whatever he gets under the table), at least it is not with the retirement money of police officers and teachers. I hope for your sake, boys, that you are the private consultant toadies and not the state government ones. You are all equally moronic, but at least your retirement will be safer.
By BIN News Editorial Staff on December 1st, 2008 at 1:51 am
Hey, WMD,
Back off on Sticky Fingers. Behind Maurice’s, Shealy’s, Little Pigs’, Duke’s, Southern Pigs’, Farm Boy’s, Melvin’s and eleventy Brazillion other really great BBQ joints in SC, the Sticky boyz have really fairly not too bad “chain” BBQ.
BIN News Editorial Staff
No Shealy Contributed to this Post
By Glenn on December 1st, 2008 at 8:14 am
The economic growth based on SC economic status and demographics does not begin with Clemson, USC, MUSC, and the like. It is Technical Schools that will boost the economy and lower the unemployment rate. SC has a large pool of laborers that we are not tapping into to get them skilled to do the type of jobs that big business would come here for. These four horsemen (Harrell, Cooper, Leatherman, McConnell) are the antichrist to SC’s economic stimulus.
By BIN News Editorial Staff on December 1st, 2008 at 8:45 am
In addition to being an incompetent asshole, I would like to point out that I had to leave a high level “oppose Proposition 8″ rally in Calirofnia to post on this blog and further my hate fest against “fol(k)s” (haha I made a funny) who are actually sucessful in driving public policy.
Oh and yes, Bobby sends me on the attac(k) often…..I am his “head” fluffer.
BIN News Editorial Staff
Ri(c)Flair and Im-Balanced
By Mincing Words on December 1st, 2008 at 9:05 am
Well, BIN, I imagine this post is a bit too long for your 13-year-old brain to wrap around. Don’t worry, if you keep working hard in middle school, you, too, will be able to digest posts like these in 5 or 6 years. Keep at it!
P.S. Your mom told me to tell you that you were supposed to be in bed, lights out, at 10. Busted!
By Fashizzle on December 1st, 2008 at 9:48 am
Most state employees work for peanuts and now the legislature wants to raid their retirement fund too. Why is the the Policy Council the only group sounding the alarm?
BIN and WMD — while cashing your checks take a minute to remember you’re advocating for robbing little old ladies living off a state pension. In my book, that makes you a scumbag of the worst degree…so its no surprise the company you keep.
By Friedman's Ghost on December 1st, 2008 at 10:05 am
Is there anyone in the legislature who claims to support this crap? I read in Tim Smith’s piece (yes, we get newspapers in the afterworld) that Speaker Harrell’s “public relations” guy, Greg Foster, issued a tepid defense of this steaming pile of dung, but does the Speaker indeed own this thing?
Well, I suspect that he does and, what’s worse, that he truly believes that having the state government direct economic activity is a good thing. But concentrated power in the state is not rendered harmless by the good intentions of those who create it.
This “Knowledge Council Sector” dreck was preceded by the Legislative Mandarins’ bleating a few months ago that, in the face of a rising unemployment rate, the state government needed to “do something.” Frankly, at the time I believed its purpose was to simply slam the governor for his faith in the free market and to score some populist political points, but it has clearly metastised into something far more horrible.
Well, here’s some history about that kind of thing. The Great Depression, like most other periods of severe unemployment, was produced by government mismanagement rather than by any inherent instability of the private economy. And frankly, the stuff spouted by FDR seems like something from Plato’s Republic compared to what the second-rate minds behind the “Knowledge Sector Council” have put out.
Bottom line is: do we believe in the free market, or do we believe that the state must direct capital investment? Democrats have always believed the latter, with John Maynard Keynes as their guide. And we that approach being taken by Pelosi, Reid, Frank, et al. in Washington. Republicans (at least in theory) believe the latter: they believe in the freedom of people to control their own lives in accordance with their own values and that such is the surest way to achieve the full potential of a great society.
One of the most articule proponents of this core Republican creed was, of course, Barry Goldwater. And the legislator who most loudly proclaims to be a “Goldwater Republican” is Sen. Glenn McConnell. And yet at the press conference that presaged the load of horse dung now laid on us by The Council, that very senator stood shoulder-to-shoulder with Leatherman, Harrell and the other apostles of government-driven economics. What gives?
By Friedman's Ghost on December 1st, 2008 at 10:10 am
Reliance on the freedom of people to control their own lives in accordance with their own values is the surest way to achieve the full potential of a great society. Government-driven economics like The Knowledge Sector Council is a failed idea (see The Five-Year Plans for the National Economy of the USSR).
By Stop this foolishness on December 1st, 2008 at 10:19 am
Sic Willie is right on target on this one. Get the big government bureaucrats out of this type of planning. They can barely balance a budget- focus on educating our kids first- if there is any money left over- give it back to us the taxpayers.
If overpaid bureaucrats want to go to more meetings , they should join a fraternity or the Elks Club or Kiwanis Club or better yet a non-profit group that works for the homeless.
Anybody can see this is a waste of time and money for our limited resources.
By mijeel on December 1st, 2008 at 10:35 am
Notwithstanding that the average SC public school graduate and typical ADD internet surfer couldn’t read the story, and regardless whether Sic, BIN or WMD are on the payrolls of some PAC or other influence-peddling entity, it doesn’t change the underlying story’s premise. The only growing portion of the SC economy appears to be the unaccountable bureaucracy sector.
In my view, we should treat with extreme scepticism anything being promoted by any of SC’s legislative “leadership” or any member of the “4 Officer Team.” When you attempt to illustrate visually the various so-called economic development missions of SCRA, SC Launch, the SC Department of Commerce, the Knowledge Sector Council, and the various research arms of CU, USC, and MUSC, etc., you end up with something that looks like it was drawn by a two year-old on an Etch-a-Sketch.
This message was paid for by its author and is not subsidized by any influence-peddling entity of any kind other than the author himself.
By Gen. Longstreet on December 1st, 2008 at 12:05 pm
Colonel Harrell! What is this rubbish? I read that Tim Smith story about the steaming load of dung the South Carolina Oligarchs have excreted. Why, it lead to this extremely upsetting phantasmagoria in my dreams last night, a bizarre converation with Bobby Lee that disturbs me still, sir:
Lee: Can I accompany you, General Longstreet?
Longstreet: Yes sir, it’s always a great pleasure having you here.
Longstreet: With this new Knowledge Sector Council stuff, it’s a bizarre time at the Statehouse – almost as strange as when Gov. Sanford took the pigs into the Statehouse Lobby.
Lee: Yes, but Wilkins was here then.
Longstreet: Yes, he was. And now he’s in Canada. Canada! I remember Gov. Sanford’s assault – hah! Reminded me of the assault on the walls of Chapultepec with the good George Pickett, Reynolds, Ulysses Sam Grant, a lot of good and brave men. Some of them are waiting for us over there in the Gressette and Blatt Buildings.
Longstreet: And now with this wretched Knowledge Sector Council, the fight will resume – with Sanford and his boys doing battle with Harrell, Leatherman and – good God – Glenn McConnell! And of course we’ll fight with the gov – but I don’t know sometimes it seems to me impossible that those boys, those men in the Legislature, are really our foes I led many of them I fought with them.
Lee: I know it. By the way, did you know that McConnell has wasted millions of dollars on that sorry-ass submarine those high school kids built?
Lieutenant General James Longstreet: Yes, I did. Insane. What is our goal now, Gen. Lee?
Lee: To destroy the Knowledge Council Sector, whatever that is — that is our great aim and I think there are no doubts about it.
Lee: Do you see, General Longstreet, for the new guys like Shoopman and Davis and Mulvaney, there is a great trap — to be a good legislator you must love the Legislature, but to be a great leader you must be ready the order the sacrifice of what you love.
Lee: We don’t fear death. You and I, oh certainly we expect some empty chairs in the Senate and, perhaps, the House, an homage to the fallen mates, but this war makes slaughter and the price is higher and higher.
Longstreet: We will be ready to lose some of them but we will be never ready to lose them all – after all that money spent by the governor and his men to elect the reformers! Are they all to fall on the sword fighting these wretched shapes?
Lee: We are assisting to a real slaughter and I want it to finish. I want it to be the final battle. I want to smash every pyramid, pipeline and pillar! Enough!
Longstreet: For a moment I feared Bobby Harrell went away this morning.
Lee: I was afraid he had gone away and the war would have gone on and on.
Longstreet: Sir, we will make him repent of having stayed.
Lee: That God might be with you.
Longstreet: And with you, sir.
By Homage to Lee's War Horse! on December 1st, 2008 at 1:08 pm
This colloquy is excellent stuff:
Longstreet: For a moment I feared Bobby Harrell went away this morning.
Lee: I was afraid he had gone away and the war would have gone on and on.
Longstreet: Sir, we will make him repent of having stayed.
Lee: That God might be with you.
Longstreet: And with you, sir.
By ** on December 1st, 2008 at 6:54 pm
The only comment I have, since swearing off SC politics due to mental health concerns, is that…
concerning “founding editor’s bowel movements needs to be described as a…”
[n] S or a U to be considered healthy. Mrs. Sic will confirm this, and then we will be in complete agreement concerning our favorite editor.
;)
By BIN News Editorial Staff on December 1st, 2008 at 7:33 pm
Will,
The BIN News Editorial Staff has worked hard to make you know which posts are from our elite staff. We do not want you confused by fake posts from common trolls.
We take offense when you allow “common trolls” to post as if they are from out elite team. Will, if you want us to respect you…..
…then you must respect our team. No fake BIN Posts.
You have BIN-Warned.
BIN News Editorial Staff
Flair and Blanced
By -- on December 1st, 2008 at 9:30 pm
You have BIN-Warned…Rooster MO. Period.
By -- on December 1st, 2008 at 9:38 pm
Am I good, or what?
By Silence the Noise on December 1st, 2008 at 10:18 pm
BIN…..from your most recent blab of shit…”We take offense when you allow “common trolls†to post as if they are from out elite team. Will, if you want us to respect you…..”
“out” elite team?
good call dumbass.
how’s that publi(k) education treating you kid?
By NotforHire on December 19th, 2008 at 10:11 am
Your slip is showing.
Trackbacks