Comments on: Going Under

By: Jerry

Jerry — Fri, 28 Nov 2008 23:57:16 +0000

Hey, as to “cuts” I don’t disagree with your concept, but you put them in quotes, “cuts” — not parentheses (cuts). hey I’m an old newsguy and picky.

By: lisa

lisa — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:51:10 +0000

let’s praise and reward the “Club for Growth”…that ought work

By: James the Foot Soldier

James the Foot Soldier — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 02:29:01 +0000

Right. Which is why I believe the sources are under-estimating next year’s revenue drop. At least some semblance of reality has set in and they’re not counting on more money like the nimrods did for this year.

By: fitsnews

fitsnews — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:11:24 +0000

James … 488 + 135 = 623, right?

By: James the Foot Soldier

James the Foot Soldier — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:48:20 +0000

I don’t think your sources are any better at math than the wizards at the statehouse.

By my calculations total “mid-year” cuts needed to date total $623 million. And we’re still OVER a month away from the REAL mid-year.

Kudos to those budget gurus at the statehouse – with sharpshooters like that it’s no wonder Sherman’s army pelted the statehouse from across the rive.

My hunch is we’ll be close to “cutting” a cool billion when all is said and done.

By: fitsnews

fitsnews — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:12:12 +0000

Dude it’s the day before Thanksgiving … c’mon.

FITS

By: Tempest

Tempest — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 20:50:08 +0000

THis looks like the kind of woman you would like Will. Big tits and morose. TWo of your favorite things right? Should we ask Miss Dunning? HMM?