Comments on: Scarborough Protest Could Be Decided By SC House

By: katlin k

katlin k — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:49:33 +0000

I cannot believe the legislature decides Election Commission appeals. Well, yes I can. This is the most backwards state in America. Why do we even have a governor or a court system? Let’s just let those guys decide everything. They do anyway.

By: Dean J

Dean J — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:46:00 +0000

Just because some redneck moron “alleges” voter fraud does not mean it happened. Taxpayers have to fund a new election and those ain’t cheap. That’s why you have to have really clear evidence of fraud, otherwise these scumbags would challenge every time they lost. We shouldn’t have to pay for a whole new election just because Rep. Scarborough hates to lose his power and whatever other “perks” he got for shilling for the speaker. If there were clear evidence of actual fraud, that would be one thing. But unless he can prove it little Wally needs to take his marbles and go home.

By: JJ

JJ — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:08:48 +0000

EVERYBODY listen up: IF 700 voters voted in the election when they were not suppose to it IS cause under our law for a new election. Districts and boundaries are drawn for a reason, and those 700 people should not have been allowed by the poll manager to vote in that race. I ask Democrats: should we ignore this mistake just because your girl won, or should the law be upheld for a FAIR election. You may not like it because you dont like being fair, but 4 Dems used this arguement to get special elections in Richland and Horry County in 2006. In fact a Dem filed this exact same protest in Horry yesterday. So forget about Wallace and follow the law, which includes the above comment.

By: Silence the Noise

Silence the Noise — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:11:28 +0000

Let Bobby try this one. That will be the last straw with us….his constituents.