Meet Mandy

By fitsnews • on October 28, 2008
Comment Print

She’s a John Edwards-style, socialist trial lawyer who has run the nastiest, most negative, most diabolically duplicitous and deliberately deceptive campaign for public office we’ve ever seen in this state.

And believe us, we’ve seen plenty of them …

Simply put, a vote for Mandy Powers-Norrell is only slightly smarter than blowing your brains out or playing chicken with Interstate traffic.

You can click here and here for a little background on this latest diva of the far, far left, but the good news is that her Genghis Khan/ Jayson Blair approach to campaigning is at least easy on the eyes.

This isn’t one of our official endorsements, of course, but we think it’s obvious that Lancaster and York County (S.C.) voters should send taxpayer hero Mick Mulvaney to Columbia so they can continue to keep an eye on Mrs. Powers-Norrell … a very close eye … a very, very close eye …

Comments

By Zestfully Clean on October 28th, 2008 at 2:08 pm

She could read me a book any night of the week. Preferably by whispering it in my ear.

Unfortunately it would probably be the “Communist Manifesto.”

By Tiger on October 28th, 2008 at 2:11 pm

you sexist racist piece of shit will.

mandy is a sarah palin republican not a john edwards democrat.

your sexist attacks against her are REPREHENSABLE!

By Will on October 28th, 2008 at 2:21 pm

her “easy on the eye” qualities end in the waist region. Its kind of like the iceberg metaphor…..1/3 is above the water and pretty…..2/3 is below the water and not so small. just ask the titanic.

By et on October 28th, 2008 at 2:28 pm

are mom jeans a requirement for campaigning amongst “the people?” or did she choose those?

By Fact Checker on October 28th, 2008 at 3:30 pm

Tiger:

She is pro-gay….she is pro-ACLU…she is pro-choice…she is pro-tax. Go look it up. She has admitted all of those things.

Now, that may be Republican to you…but then that would make you part of the problem in the party.

Oh, and she supported Edwards first and now Obama…still looking for those elusive Palinesque features you trumpet so loudly.

By GnuBerry on October 28th, 2008 at 3:38 pm

How much does Mulvaney pay Viepolitik?

By fitsnews on October 28th, 2008 at 3:56 pm

GnuBerry,

Viewpolitik LLC assisted Rep. Mulvaney on a one-time basis in the preparation of polling questions back in August of this year. We found that he was winning (big), which is no doubt why Mrs. Powers-Norrell (hottie though she is) has chosen to wage such a nasty and dishonest campaign.

You’ll have to ask Sic Willie about the details of the poll (e-mail him at w@viewpolitik.com), but I believe his firm offered to do it pro bono before Rep. Mulvaney insisted on providing compensation in the amount of $750, an amount which his campaign disclosed along with all of its other contributions and expenses.

This is in stark contrast to Mrs. Powers-Norrell’s campaign, which continues to ignore state ethics law by refusing to disclose required occupational info regarding the thousands of dollars in contributions she’s received from her liberal John Edwards trial lawyer buddies.

Oh, and $750???

All we can say to that is “puhhleeaze.” If you’re gonna accuse us of being on the take, you better come at us with more than chump change.

-FITS

By ABBA on October 28th, 2008 at 5:32 pm

Jordache jeans! Wow! 1970’s here we go!

By mick's in trouble, huh? on October 28th, 2008 at 8:34 pm

Wow…ol’ Mick must really be in trouble that you’ve devoted so much online ink to Mandy.

By rick on October 29th, 2008 at 8:16 am

I wonder if shes for distribution of her wealth….

By Stroker Ace on October 29th, 2008 at 10:56 am

I’m not quite sure how Mulvaney is a taxpayer hero when he is using state bonds and land deals to profit for himself. Sounds like the kind of taxpayer protection I don’t want, especially from a man who is all about Charlotte (where his kids go to school, where his cell phone is registered, and probably where he pays the most taxes), which last time I checked was in NORTH Carolina.

By Toyota Kawaski on October 29th, 2008 at 4:13 pm

Never trust a woman that uses 3 names.Do the research they are all flake jobs start with Hillary Rod Clinton.If she uses 3 names run run run

By Sick of Mandy in LA on November 3rd, 2008 at 2:12 pm

I wouldn’t vote for Mandy if she were running for dog catcher. I went to church with her for 5 years at FBC. She came for business meetings and her husband sang Neil Diamond during the worship service. Seriously, just ask the illustrious Rev. Roy Barnes(he has sung her praises in the Lancaster News). She came to our church Fall festival in revealing costumes: Wonder Woman with fake boobs hanging out everywhere and another year as Snow White(I really don’t think Snow White wore a thong Mandy). And, if you want to know her real stance on the issues, here is the email she sent a ton of us at church during the last presidential election. I’m not sure why I got it, I was never invited to her wine and cheese parties. When I replied and asked to be removed from her address book, she (Mandy, not Mitch) replied, not to worry she wouldn’t try to sway me with her liberal propaganda. Our pastor at the time Rob O’Neal, defended her….the sad part it that there are folks around here voting for her just because they know her parents or go to her church… they have no idea the liberal stance she has. Palin, I think not.

Thank you for the email, but we are pro-gay and pro-women, we support the ACLU, we believe Mel Gibson’s film is anti-semetic (but that’s okay, it’s just a movie). We don’t want publically-sponsored prayer in schools, lest the Buddhists gain control of Congress. And if the Boy Scouts want to receive preferrential government treatment, then they should not discriminate. Besides, the “election guide” is terribly misleading — Kerry does not support gay marriage, he supports civil unions to give homosexuals the rights to get health insurance of their partners and visit them in the hospital when they’re sick. He does not “favor” partial birth abortion, he didn’t vote for a ban because there were no protections for incest of the life of the mother — what kind of sick person would “favor” partial birth abortion? That’s very unfair. He has never “assaulted” the Boy Scouts, but opposes their discriminatory position and doesn’t believe they should use our national parks free of charge if they discriminate. Kerry is a Christian, but he does not believe in forcing his beliefs on others (just like the founding fathers). We believe the term “Christian” is being politicized and morphed into something we most decidedly are not — Republican.

Mitch and Mandy

Leave a Comment