Comments on: Obama’s Money: Should This Even Be A Race?

By: rick

rick — Sun, 26 Oct 2008 03:11:34 +0000

By FWFIV on October 24th, 2008 at 7:45 am

In past election cycles the Republican warchest was much larger than the Democrats. I donâ€™t remember conservative writers worrying about â€œbuyingâ€ public office when they were winning.

Anybody notice when a point is made, the other side spends time regressing to childhood “he did it first” whining rather than coming up with a reasoned argument….

By: Pres

Pres — Fri, 24 Oct 2008 18:27:18 +0000

He IS a socialist. His platform is pure socialism, so that isn’t debateable.

By: Toyota Kawaski

Toyota Kawaski — Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:38:05 +0000

more top notch reporting by Man-DE who nows go by Nancy

By: FWFIV

FWFIV — Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:45:29 +0000

In past election cycles the Republican warchest was much larger than the Democrats. I don’t remember conservative writers worrying about “buying” public office when they were winning.

By: Phil C

Phil C — Fri, 24 Oct 2008 05:46:20 +0000

Well. If all things were equal from the beginning, He probably wouldn’t need the money. Here’s the list of BS claims he’s had to fight. WTF!!!

- He’s a Muslim
- Terrorist
- Not Patriotic
- Socialist
- and the dandy of them all. He’s not really a natural American.

Everyone knew his opponents were going to exploit the worst fears in people and it happened. Judging from the financial support. Many Americans agree.

By: Brad K

Brad K — Fri, 24 Oct 2008 01:23:56 +0000

this is a joke if he is going to try to out-buy Mccain with more campaign money and it is a sorry attempt to become president cause it wont happen no matter how much money he spends