Professors For Terrorism?

By fitsnews • on October 22, 2008
Comment Print

We’ll admit it, for being such a leading conservative blog in a red-as-hell Southern state, we haven’t gotten as riled up about the whole Bill Ayers-Barack Obama controversy as we probably should have.

Part of our initial disinterest was undoubtedly due to our complete and total lack of enthusiasm for either of the major party candidates in the current U.S. Presidential election, which is the context for Ayers becoming a most undeserving 15-minute celebrity.

Given their shared aversion to the market principles on which this nation was built, we frankly want nothing to do with either Barack Obama or John McCain.

In fact, it was only when Sarah Palin’s legs seduced us – and then only when our founding editor’s alma mater was revealed as a big Ayers’ travel provider – did we even think the connection between Obama and this unrepentant former domestic terrorist was worth exploring.

Which is our bad.

Of course, another part of our initial disinterest stemmed from the fact that – McCain’s political opportunism notwithstanding – we simply didn’t think people would be in a big rush to defend a guy who earlier this decade said he “didn’t do enough” blowing stuff up during his previous life as a hippie hoodlum.

Certainly, Obama hasn’t been in a big rush to defend Ayers, whose Weather Underground terrorist group managed to kill a few cops as part of its “progressive advocacy” back in the seventies.

But apparently 3,247 people (and counting) are in a big rush to support Ayers, so much so that they’ve launched their own website, SupportBillAyers.org.

“It seems that the character assassination and slander of Bill Ayers and other people who have known Obama is not about to let up,” the website’s home page proclaims. “While an important concern is the dishonesty of this campaign and the slanderous McCarthyism they are using to attack Obama, we also feel an obligation to support our friend and colleague Bill Ayers. Many, many educators have reached out, asking what they could do, seeking a way to weigh in against fear and intimidation.”

How nice.

What about the actual assassination of two New York cops by Ayers’ group during an armored truck heist? Or the San Francisco cop who got blown to smithereens by a Weather Underground pipe bomb?

What about the “fear and intimidation” those men and their families were subjected to?

Not surprisingly, the pro-Ayers’ petition makes no mention of that sort of thing.

Comprised mostly of academics from New York, Chicago and Los Angeles (as well as representatives of the “Socialist Alliance,” the National Democratic Party and the AFL-CIO), it actually surprised us somewhat that most of petition’s signatories actually listed the colleges and universities where they work.

In fact, nine of them – Louise Jennings, Bruce E. Field, Craig Kridel, Elizabeth Powers-Costello, Gloria Boutte, Alan Wieder, Pamella Jewett and Michelle L. Jay – proudly identified themselves as faculty members at the University of South Carolina.

Specifically, all of them work at USC’s College of Education, where Ayers’ has spoken on at least two occasions to groups that included South Carolina public school children.

A tenth USC faculty member – English professor Katherine Adams – also signed the petition.

Additionally, two professors from Clemson University’s education department – Suzanne Rosenblith and Victoria Ridgeway Gillis – signed it as well.

That’s a dozen South Carolina professors, people, all of whom are apparently convinced that Ayers is a guy worth defending.

Frankly, we couldn’t disagree with them more – which is one reason we put that over-the-top image of the Oklahoma City bombing site at the top of this story.

Sure, Ayers and his buds weren’t as good as Timothy McVeigh when it came to being terrorists (they even blew up a few of their own members accidentally during a bomb-building session), but the fact remains that their violence did take innocent American lives – and domestic terrorism is domestic terrorism no matter how many people died from it, or how long ago it happened.

Now we’ve intentionally refrained from going after Obama too hard on his connections to Ayers – even after it became obvious he was lying about how well he knew the guy – because to be honest, we didn’t want to be perceived as another one of these typical GOP yokel-sites dedicated to the perpetuation of slippery slope logic.

But that doesn’t change our belief that Ayers should be in a jail cell right now, not getting paid by South Carolina taxpayers to lecture our public school kids.

Nor does it change our belief that anybody who signs a petition of support for this guy – who still refuses to apologize for his organization’s murderous acts – begs the question of whether or not they believe he and his cohorts were right to do what they did.

Again, domestic terrorism is domestic terrorism, people, and to tolerate those who practiced it at any point in their lives is to give others hope that they can do it, get away with it and one day become “respectable” and “distinguished” citizens, too.

That’s not the message any of these professors need to be sending …

Match.com

Comments

By greg on October 22nd, 2008 at 6:44 am

What a list of vegetarian, pacifist, wanna be leftist and probably lesbian members of the whacko left!

Higher Ed is a mass of lazy, over paid refugees from the free enterprise system. Many of them have left academia at different points in their lives, but they always come back to the “best deal” in town.

They are insulated from the rules that require a sense of normalcy, hence the whacko crap that comes out of those institutions.

Now they are going to have their own President. Obama will either be the greatest boon to the whacko socialist crowd, or he will drive the nation back to its fundamentally conservative roots.

By James on October 22nd, 2008 at 7:53 am

Good work at hanging some red meat for the kool-aid drinkers.

Back to the real story:
If you really want to expose the “higher education” myth get an answer to the following question:

How many classes do these 12 “distinguished” professors actually TEACH??

By Jack on October 22nd, 2008 at 8:36 am

Only in America could so many people whose beliefs are so perverted that they are unable to make a living in the open market find a way to live off the earnings of others as “educators”. Many of these people assume their much higher than average salaries are their just deserts for being gifted enough to guide the peasants out of the darkness. It’s time for taxpayers to take a good look at what their tax dollars are supporting at our state universities.

I’m not opposed to anyone presenting their ideas in a free and open exchange. Anyone has that right, and should band together with others of like mind and seek support for their positions. I am opposed to being forced to contribute to their support through taxation, especially when the colleges and universities where they congregate ardently strive to stifle contrary ideas.

By Darkknight on October 22nd, 2008 at 8:43 am

Those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it – once a murderer always a murderer. Why not pull someone off deathrow at our “own” prison and let them speak to kids? Only because Ayers has money – THAT is the real reason they want him.
I wonder if Ayers will be taxed more since he makes more than Obamaman’s new $250k limit?? Or will Obamaman pardon Ayers – forgetting that he murdered those who protect and serve the rest of us???

By Cooter Brown on October 22nd, 2008 at 9:13 am

Hit wood bee a hellova lot better fo’ de youngins in SC, if’n we kept ‘em out of dese God-foursaken, communistical communes of higher lernin’ (an’ I do mean higher– weed smokin’ hippies!) an’ provide dem wit a dern library card. Dat is, if de govmint ain’t already purged the clasicks an’ tru histry books outta ‘em.

Hits a scam: K-12 an’ dem colleges! Weeze all knows it.

My Pa hada 3rd grad schoolin’ an’ knew a hellova lot more dan dese youngin’ with deit fancy pants lamb skins (or four skins) dey frame up an’ put on deir walls!

De edjumacation in dese her parts is designed to make dumb voters and spineless citizens. Whacha spect? ‘Course dey love Ayers. Day wants our youngins to wear red an’ march in step.

Kin ye hear dat? Hits the march of de youngin’ comin’ to burn our books and ‘rest us for believin’ men out to be free for to pursue dere life, dere liber-t, an’ dere happiness. To da goolog wit old Cooter… Wait ‘n see!

By male sapphist on October 22nd, 2008 at 2:42 pm

I think Cooter’s missive qualifies as a passing PACT score. Welcome to South Carolina government education. Screwing whites directly, blacks by exclusion, and now screwing everyone that crosses one of their palacial thresholds…don’t forget anyone that owns real property…we are getting really screwed.

By Joshua on October 22nd, 2008 at 4:51 pm

I don’t even want to know what seven profs (USC or otherwise) are teaching while signing up for the “I support the terrorist” websites.

Fire. Them. All.

By James on October 22nd, 2008 at 9:12 pm

Don’t worry Josh – these hags suckling at the government tit aren’t lighting the world on fire with their teaching prowess.

By Darkknight on October 23rd, 2008 at 8:56 am

I bet all 7 of them also signed a petition to Kick out and condemn the Duke Lacrosse team too!! Sheep – they are sheep following idiots.

By Ed on October 23rd, 2008 at 12:16 pm

Despite the long wait, this article is still out of context and clouded by a typically unhealthy affinity for fear-building & terrorism finger-pointing. It has lead to the generization of these left thinkers together as people who are “crazy and dangerous” and the bastardization of all of academia. This is dangerous first, and in my opinion foolish. Contrary to what is thrown around in the right media- Ayers did not kill anyone and “unrepentant” terrorist is unfair. He himself doesn’t have to pay or apologize for anything, and his “celebrity” status, now emerging 30 years after the fact of his militant days is only due to the election- I bet he does not egotistically enjoy such time in the “limelight”, considering it’s ruining the admirable reputation he’s turned and built since those days. If that isn’t repentance on its own, I don’t know what is.

Readers here can’t believe or understand why people are “actually” and “apparently” supporting him. This misunderstanding is important- if one is unable or unwilling to try to understand the context and real Bill Ayers, I encourage similarly to stay away from the controversy.

By rick on October 23rd, 2008 at 6:25 pm

Ed, you’re an moron. Being a leader in the Weather Underground makes you as guilty as the individual that planted the bombs and pulled the trigger. And in 2001 when he said he hadn’t done enough….make this argument to the survivors families….His escaping justice was due to the incompetency of the federal government and not his innocence. What we need in this country is less tolerance and more rope manufacturers.

By James on October 23rd, 2008 at 11:09 pm

Ed: I understand fully WHY welfare queens parading as higher educrats support Ayers, himself now a full-blooded government tit sucker: MONEY.

How ironic that the “man” that bombed the Pentagon, NYPD, etc. and sought to overthrow his governemnt now sucks at the government tit with the same abandonment as the very institutions he loathed.

Every socialist has the SAME premise: wealth spreading for the masses while the leaders stash the krugerands and live in palatial surroundings.

Leave a Comment