DeMint V. Lindsey On Federal Bailout

By fitsnews • on September 23, 2008
Comment Print

Since South Carolina’s two U.S. Senators are both professional politicians, it’s not at all surprising that they’re talking about what everybody else is talking about right now – the collapse of Wall Street and what (if anything) the federal government should do about it.

Given the preponderance of public preoccupation on this issue, we found it rather predictable that both Lindsey Graham and Jim DeMint put out statements yesterday offering their views on the Bush administration’s proposed $700 billion bailout of an easily-avoidable crisis that came from years of irresponsible, government-mandated lending policies.

Specifically, these policies.

What we did find interesting, however, was the stark difference in the tone and substance of these two Senatorial statements.

Graham, in his typical glad-handing “Gang of 14″ style, loaded up his comments with shallow Washington-isms and throwaway political pablum – saying inane and meaningless things like “now is the time to focus on solutions, not empty rhetoric,” or that Congress should “work quickly and cooperatively with the Administration to address our financial problems before they get worse.”

Actually, these politicians should have been working “quickly and cooperatively” a long time ago at not being so chronically brain dead, but that’s another story.

Anyway, Graham’s big solution to the current crisis (well, in addition to a bailout) is to create yet another Washington D.C. political entity that would be responsible for … wait for it … regulating the bailout …

“I realize any proposal will not contain all provisions I like or support. I do hope however we give further consideration to the creation of an independent board made up of Republicans, Democrats, and Independents who would have oversight over any government’s expenditures on a rescue plan. There is merit in this approach and I hope it would be an essential ingredient in any bailout plan. We need to bring the best minds in our nation together to help solve a very difficult problem.”

Yikes. The only thing Graham left out was naming Oprah and Hillary to lead the effort.

Then there’s DeMint’s statement, which unlike the one you just read actually takes a definitive position on the matter at hand.

In fact, his statement is so damn good we’re going to publish it in its entirety, in the hopes that everybody in South Carolina will read it, especially Lindsey Graham …

“After reviewing the Administration’s proposed bailout plan, I believe it is completely unacceptable. This plan does nothing to address the misguided government policies that created this mess and it could make matters much worse by socializing an entire sector of the U.S. economy. This plan fails to oversee or regulate the government failures that led to this crisis. Instead it greatly increases the role for Secretary Paulson whose market predictions have been consistently wrong in the last year, and provides corporate welfare for investment firms on Wall Street that don’t want to disclose their assets and sell them to private investors for market rates. Most Americans are paying their bills on time and investing responsibly and should not be forced to pay for the reckless actions of some on Wall Street, especially when no one can guarantee this will solve our current problems.”

“This plan will not only cause our nation to fall off the debt cliff, it could send the value of the dollar into a free-fall as investors around the world question our ability to repay our debts. It’s also very likely that this plan will extend the cycle of bailouts, encouraging other companies to behave in reckless ways that create the need for even more bailouts, triggering an endless run on our treasury. This plan may make things look better for Wall Street in the next couple months, but the long-term consequences to our economy could be disastrous.

“There are much better ways of dealing with this problem than forcing American taxpayers to pay for every asset some investor doesn’t want anymore. We should start by reforming government policies and programs that created this mess, including the Federal Reserve’s easy money policy, the congressional charters of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and the Community Reinvestment Act. Then Congress should pass a number of permanent and proven pro-growth reforms to encourage capital formation and boost asset values. We need to make permanent reductions in the corporate tax and the capital gains tax rates. We have the second highest corporate tax rate in the world, which encourages companies to take jobs and investment overseas.”

“It’s a sad fact, but Americans can no longer trust the economic information they are getting from this Administration. The Administration said the bailout of Bear Stearns would stop the bleeding and solve the problem, but they were wrong. They said $150 billion in new government spending using rebate checks would solve the problem, but they were wrong again. They said new authority to bailout Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac would solve the problem without being used, but they were wrong again. Now they want us to trust them to spend nearly a trillion dollars on more government bailouts. It’s completely irresponsible and I cannot support it.”

Damn, people.

We don’t say this often about politicians but DeMint just absolutely friggin’ nailed it. Not only did he nail the truth behind our current crisis, but he also perfectly nailed the perspective on government needed to solve it, which is coincidentally the perspective that this country was founded on and the perspective that the Republican Party is supposed to be, as the kids say, “all about.”

Seriously, we’re thinking of turning this glorious press release into a hymn (something in D Major, perhaps) and making our congregation sing it every Sunday.

We’ve talked trash about DeMint plenty of times in the past, but lately he’s been giving these jokers in Washington all the hell they can handle.

And good for him.

At least one of our U.S. Senators is actually concerned about the fact that … whether it’s Social Security, Medicare, these ridiculous bailouts or all the pork that flows through Washington … somebody is ultimately going to have to pay for all this crap.

And that somebody is every one of us.

Match.com

Comments

By James on September 23rd, 2008 at 8:43 am

Thank God we have one real Senator here in South Carolina – he was right on Medicare D and he’s right on this boondoggle as well.

As for Senator Graham – she should quit calling herself a republican.

The root cause of the problem was banks were lending money to folks who couldn’t pay off a payday loan let alone a freakin’ mortgage. And now politicians are surprised at the depth of the mess they’ve created and want the taxpayers (actually, no one reading this posting since it will be our children’s children) footing the bill.

BEND OVER AND GRAB YOUR ANKLES – THE GOVERNMENT IS HERE TO HELP

Foreclose the deadbeats out of the house, let it sit empty until 4 families of undocumented aliens scrape up the cash to rent it and let the bank hold title to the asset until it recovers it’s value in 5 years.

P.S. Senator Shelby in ‘Bama is also leading the charge on this boondoggle.

By gcoats84 on September 23rd, 2008 at 8:56 am

Wish Inglis thought like Demint

By Natasha on September 23rd, 2008 at 9:32 am

That was a great statement. Wonder who actually wrote it? This bailout is scary, and gosh darnit all it will be the dems that put a stop to it…Damn republicans…Please don’t let this bailout happen. All I want to know is who got severance packages and bonuses in the last bailout and if this new, $700 billion bailout also includes that kind of crap.

By rick on September 23rd, 2008 at 11:09 am

Natasha, the dems own this mess. Jimmy Carter started it with his Community Development Act, Bill Clinton enlarged it by expanding the Act and using the federal bully pulpit to force banks into giving loans to unqualified people (read affirmative action in action) and when the republicans attempted to manage a correction in 2003 after major financial markets warned of the impending crisis, Chris Dodd, O’Bama and Barney Frank fought any changes saying the dangers were over inflated. Cry and curse all you want but listening to the liberal talking points will only rot you’re brain. As far as bonuses….invest in the market and vote for the board of directors. Bailout….let them fail and send the 2 biggest takers of Fannie/Freddie money to jail…..that would be Chris and Barack.

By Cooter Brown on September 23rd, 2008 at 12:40 pm

Jim the Mint turn’d a mity nice phrase or too in that thar speech or what’evr. Miss Lindsay has gots to go– I mean ta tell y’all. That sissy son-and-so betta hope dat his masa, Marse John MacKain wins so dats he’s gots a job– perhaps his lawn jockey or somethin’.

I think dat flat-top bob feller is a gonna win despite himself– folls is sik o’ dat Lindsey-Loo. Bring da scalleywag home– The Mint, well, he outta stay if’n he’s a gonna vote ‘gains all dat bail-up, over, and out bitness.

By Stroker Ace on September 23rd, 2008 at 1:18 pm

Rick, you are a moron and it is evident you probably can’t balance your checkbook. Mortgage lending excesses in the early years of this decade ultimately took a toll on the financial sector, bringing down lenders like Countrywide Financial and Wall Street icons like Bear Stearns. As confidence ebbed, credit tightened, and central banks took steps to limit the damage to the economy and the financial system. Interest rates began to fall in 2001 when the tech bubble burst. In 2002 Wall Street and bankers convinced that mortgage backed securities and collatarized debt will help reduce and disperse risk. About 2002, with interest rates low, home prices begin to rise and are artificially inflated (think coast, California etc). About 2006 we saw one of the biggest booms in refi’s and mortgage because lenders were encouraged by low rates to offer loans with little or no money down (programs they call it). The beginning of last year, rates rose and home sales and prices began to dip, and about 3 months later, New Century, one of the biggest mortgage lenders files for banruptcy protection. Late last year, defaults inreased sharply even on supposed “good loans”. So, then Bear Sterns (and we all know that story) pledges 3+billion to bail out one of it’s hedge funds and then it still collapses. Once all this becomes reality, the value of mortgage securities sharply drops causing the banks/etc to take close to 500 billion in write downs. This was not just happening in the US, but also the European market, for example Northern Rock (a british lender) had to turn to the Bank of England for help. I could continue this financial history lesson for you but will not. It is unfair for the bankers who sparked the crisis not to bear the full brunt of its consequences. As a business owner, it is my job to meet a payroll, pay insurance, get my accounts payable done in a timely manner. I got approved based on credit, not some community devlopment act. It was based on my ability to repay. I have many friends who profitted during the mortgage boom (all big Republicans) with loans that were suspect at best…common sense tells you a man earning $50k a year CANNOT qualify for a $350k loan, no matter what the terms, but they were getting them approved left and right, by using the system to the brink. Now my bank, is safe and sound, why?? because they refused to give loans to those that couldn’t pay them. This is simply not a political issue Rick, it is much deeper than that. People driven by greed and wealth, golden parachutes for CEO’s, collapsed pensions….when Enron collapsed, we should have all paid much more attention.

By Married Man on September 23rd, 2008 at 2:02 pm

Lindsey Graham is an evil, traitorous, little girl and she needs to be run out of office, then out of SC, then out of the US.

Graham’s support of Amnesty for these criminals who cross our borders unlawfully shows the depths of his treason. He should be put on trial for treason, for violating his oath of office to uphold the Constitution, and then he should be deported.

By Joseph Reynolds on September 23rd, 2008 at 2:31 pm

So what exactly is Demint’s plan? Its not that I think Bush’s plan will work, but it is a plan. What is the Demint plan?

he says we need to “reform government policies”…well…i notice he avoids specifics..

He then says we need to pass “proven pro-growth reforms”…. again…what exactly is he talking about?

Apparently his only solution is to cut taxes…Don’t you think its going to take more than giving tax breaks?

I expect more from you than this. You are giving Demint a free ride, and getting so excited over the fact that he is publicly stating his opposition to the Bush plan that you dont hold him accountable to providing an actual plan in opposition to it.

the easiest, weakest road to follow is to be “against” something…. but he needs to provide us a plan to consider instead. Doing that, he has the opportunity to show us his vision…and perhaps make the case that he is a legitimate leader of this nation…

Failing to provide any solutions….he merely cements his status as yet another typical failed politician that wont take a stand for anything…but is against everything…

By James on September 23rd, 2008 at 2:32 pm

I hate to jolt the Limbaugh/Hannity/Levin talking point kool-aid, but fair is fair:

The republicans (in name only) had ample opportunity to rein this boondoggle in during their years of having control of Congress and the White House. I suspect little was done since their member districts were reaping the benefit of new subdivisions. Unfortunately, the houses were mortgaged on a foundation of sand – sub-prime mortgages, interest only, and teaser ARMs.

The REAL crime is that this mortgage paper was then rated as Aaa by rating agencies. One rating agency admitted a “spreadsheet” error caused the erroneous superior ratings on billions in mortgages. If that’s not enough to send someone to jail I don’t know what is. Why won’t any member of Congress insist on a special counsel to investigate these ratings agencies? The congress will parade Mark McGwire to a hearing on a game but they won’t press for answers in this morass?

Accepting campaign contributions from Fannie/Freddie is what it is – perfectly legal. Why just name Frank and Dodd? I’m sure there are dozens of republicans on the Fannie/Freddi contribution list as well.

Rick, BOTH parties are to blame on this mess.

By Been there-done that on September 23rd, 2008 at 2:43 pm

I thought I was alone in my thoughts on Miss Graham. Glad to know there are others who feel the same way I do.

By well on September 23rd, 2008 at 3:01 pm

Married man is scary. Not to mention homophobic.

By Brandon on September 24th, 2008 at 10:09 am

If all the fuss is about avoiding gridlock for finacial institutions to be able to borrow and lend…then why not make the money available to SOLVENT banks who have shown real due dilligence in lending. This would keep thing moving and let the **** hit the fan. We’ve go too many banks as it is.

Im with DeMint.

By rick on September 24th, 2008 at 2:15 pm

Aw gee stroker, you mean you got your loan the same as I did? Now how about telling the part about the changes in the lending rules and how Freddie and Fannie pressured the mortgage industry into giving loans against their will to anyone who could sign their names with anything other than an X. Gee, and it was all Republicans that used a system that the Dems changed because of so called RED LINING. I’m glad you’re able to run your business in a constructive honest manner and I salute you for the personal integrity. But if the banking rules that we worked under hadn’t be loosened and if the federal government had done their oversite, this wouldn’t have happened. You’re correct that everybody had their hands in the cookie jar, but the truth is…until the changes in the LAW everyone played the same way and nobody was entitled to a loan that couldn’t qualify after the banking industry did their DUE DILIGENCE. Stupid is stupid and when you’re giving shit away don’t believe that there are not those that will keep coming back for more and more and more until there is nothing left. Human nature sucks but we work with what we got. And think about it….every time the Dems have something on the Repubs they call a press conference….where’s the press conference? The only time the Dems are silent is when the world is about to dump on them…And stoker, I don’t need to, I have quicken…moron

By Stroker Ace on September 24th, 2008 at 2:18 pm

but apparently you need spell check

By rick on September 24th, 2008 at 2:27 pm

James, there are few innocent parties in this mess. When you throw the slop to the hogs, all will feed. An unregulated stream of cash draws all that know how to take advantage of it.
As far as Jim DeMint, maybe he’s trying to slow this process down to give people time to think. Quick, less than thoughtful action will do more to harm the situation than help it. People a panicking and thats a sure road to ruin. Has anyone thought out what this would do to our currency as a whole. Further devaluation of the dollar? More debt to unfriendly governments?
Did anyone check out section 8 of this plan, from what I understand, Paulson et.al will have sole control over use of the funds with no oversite whatsoever. I try to be honest, but I think that giving me sole control over this much money would cause me to forget my honesty….at least a few hundred million worth.

By rick on September 24th, 2008 at 4:51 pm

Wow, such witticisms Stroker. With such a grasp of the mundane, I’m certain you’ll eventually be able to hire someone to do you’re comedy routine for you. Until then may I pass a bit of advice….quit looking at the results and begin looking for the causation of the issue. Oh, and by the way, this piece of advice is good for business as well as politics…..Oh, but you knew that right? With your ability at critical thinking, I hope your wife or partner make the big decisions.

By Brad on October 31st, 2008 at 11:49 am

VOTE BOB CONLEY!!!!! TIME TO GET RID OF THE BACK STABBING WEASELING LOW-LIFE LINDSAY GRAHAM!!!!!!!

Trackbacks

Leave a Comment