Comments on: Carol Fowler Is Kind Of A Bitch

By: Silly Season, Silly Grammar :: FITSNews

Silly Season, Silly Grammar :: FITSNews — Sat, 25 Oct 2008 21:45:53 +0000

[...] awhile, though, we get something pretty funny forwarded our way – like the mailing sent out by the S.C. Democratic Party (SCDP) this week attacking Dee Compton, whom we are told is a Republican candidate for the State [...]

By: SIVLILA

SIVLILA — Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:43:16 +0000

YOU PEOPLE ARE IGNORANT MORONIC REDNECKS. OBVIOUSLY YOU ARE WRONG ABOUT LOOKS AND WOMEN. DOESN’T THAT MEAN YOU ARE A SEXIST? ASSUMING THAT ALL WOMEN THINK ABOUT ALL DAY IS HOW GOOD ANOTHER WOMAN LOOKS COMPARED TO THEM.
NO WONDER REPUBLICAN FEMALES LIKE PALIN. ALL SHE TALKS ABOUT IS LIPSTICK.
THAT’S WHY YOUR GIRL MADE A FOOL OF HERSELF ON NATIONAL T.V. PLENTY OF TIMES.
WHEN WILL YOU IGNORANT REPUBLICAN’S LEARN THAT IT’S NOT ALL ABOUT LOOKS WITH WOMEN? WHY DON’T YOU SAY THAT OBAMA LOOKS BETTER THAN MCCAIN AND THEREFORE MEN ARE JEALOUS OF BARACK? WHAT A DOUBLE STANDARD YOU BELIEVE WOMEN SHOULD LIVE UP TO. DOUBLE STANDARDS ARE VERY TYPICAL OF UNDER-EDUCATED RETARDED REPUBLICONS THAT IS FOR DAMN SURE.
WRITE AN INTELLIGENT POST NEXT TIME IDIOT.
CAN YOU PEOPLE EVER TALK ABOUT THE ISSUES? YOU ARE INCAPABLE OF TALKING ABOUT THE ISSUES BECAUSE ALL YOU DO IS SMEAR AND YOU WILL LOSE THIS ELECTION BECAUSE OF IT.
PALIN WILL NEVER BE THE PRESIDENT. NOT IF WHITE MALES OVER 35 CAN HELP IT.
THEY DON’T WANT THAT BIMBO DUMMY IN THE WHITE HOUSE.
BESIDES SHE’S GHETTO ALASKAN, AND DOESN’T EVEN CARE TO BE AMERICAN.
WHY DON’T ALL OF YOU MOVE BACK TO ALASKA AND MAKE YOURSELVES SEPERATE FROM THE UNITED STATES LIKE YOU WANT TO?

By: :|

:| — Sat, 13 Sep 2008 02:48:55 +0000

This one’s fun, too, when you can get it to work:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8oSoYXrAWdw&feature=related

By: :|

:| — Sat, 13 Sep 2008 01:10:31 +0000

Palin is only lipstick on the canker sore that is the Republican Party with McCai-No @ the helm. She was doing just fine where she was & we hope to ship her back up there for good. Pronto.

Vote a 3rd party this year. It’s our only hope.

……………………

Jimmy Buffet says it all @ “Door Number Three.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ROME2ATY258

By: Todd

Todd — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 21:30:29 +0000

I agree with Stand828 – I thought you were talking about Jean Toal. Not so much the physical descriptions, but the blind loyalty to the Demo’s and the win at all costs mentality. Hey, can you send CF and JT to Alaska? We’ll find out how good a shot Palin really is.

By: James

James — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 18:44:14 +0000

What Fowler was trying to do was plug the hole in the dike (pardon that totally inapprotiate pun) since women that are flocking in droves to the McCain column – evidenced by McCain’s lock on Florida and it isn’t even October!

BTW – that one issue – what a sterile way of saying Fowler is for the ending of a defenseless life. Pat, does it make you feel better about yourself and your views when you don’t have to type the word “abortion”?

By: pat

pat — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:02:25 +0000

what Fowler said was wrong, but she was trying to say — quit voting for that “one issue” and look at all the issues the candidates are proposing. the GOP has hurt our families, and Thomas Frank states that in the Wall Street Journal recently:

The GOP Loves the Heartland To Death
http://www.wsj.com/article/SB122100226859616967.html?mod=hpp_us_inside_today

By: CL

CL — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:48:23 +0000

Frank,

I don’t know why I bother, because you are not concerned with honest debate or the facts, but here goes.

Amendment I – The 1st amendment provides for freedom of religion, not freedom from religion. But nice way to invert the principle. Even if your reading were correct, your objections should be directed at the Democrats. This type of spending dates back to LBJ and the Great Society. There is a landmark SCOTUS (1968, before Nixon was in office) opinion on taxpayer standing dealing with the use of funds authorized under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (Democratic congress and LBJ in the White House) for private religious schools. Plus, Obama has indicated he would continue Bush’s faith based initiatives.

Amendment IV – Again, go talk to the Dems. FDR arrested and put into detention camps Americans of Japanese descent. He did so without probable cause and without any due process for those being detained. Clinton took the position that the government could conduct warrantless physical searches with no foreign intelligence value. http://www.washtimes.com/news/2005/dec/22/20051222-122610-7772r/

Amendment X – Do you really think the Dems respect states’ rights? The justices they have appointed have (for good and ill) trampled on states rights. The conservative justices like Scalia (and Rehnquist before him) have made a concerted effort to scale back creeping federal power (see the Lopez case and commentary on its importance for more detail).

Amendment VIII – whatever your personal views on waterboarding, it is intellectually dishonest to pretend there is no debate on whether it constitutes torture (never mind that it happened 3 times ever). You also dishonestly ignore that McCain disagrees with Bush on this score and paint all conservatives with this brush.

By: rick

rick — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:46:05 +0000

Jan…. 2 things wrong. You’re advertising your lack of education (try spellcheck) and your racism is showing (it’s always whitey’s fault). Might want to have a white man check these things for you before you embarrass yourself in the future.
Or…..shit bitch you’re shrill. whichever…..

By: stand828

stand828 — Thu, 11 Sep 2008 06:33:37 +0000

Oh, the picture and the first line of the story made me think you talking about Jean Toal…