<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Round The Horn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/08/16/round-the-horn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/08/16/round-the-horn/</link>
	<description>Unfair ... Imbalanced</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 04:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Not Only That</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/08/16/round-the-horn/#comment-34117</link>
		<dc:creator>Not Only That</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 12:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=4533#comment-34117</guid>
		<description>You are so confused.  Mande's prose is not "mellifluous."  It's showy, ostentatious, grandiose, conspicuous, flamboyant, overblown, extravagant, ornate, fancy, gaudy, elaborate.  Straight from my own thesaurus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are so confused.  Mande&#8217;s prose is not &#8220;mellifluous.&#8221;  It&#8217;s showy, ostentatious, grandiose, conspicuous, flamboyant, overblown, extravagant, ornate, fancy, gaudy, elaborate.  Straight from my own thesaurus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Vierdsen</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/08/16/round-the-horn/#comment-34044</link>
		<dc:creator>John Vierdsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 17:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=4533#comment-34044</guid>
		<description>Just because you're a lame douche with skin thinner than the ozone layer doesn't mean that John has to respond to every one of your poorly-argued diatribes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because you&#8217;re a lame douche with skin thinner than the ozone layer doesn&#8217;t mean that John has to respond to every one of your poorly-argued diatribes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
