Taxpayer Funded Lobbying On The Rise In SC
YOUR MONEY BEING IS SPENT TO SPEND EVEN MORE OF YOUR MONEY
FITSNews - June 19, 2008 - Every year, House Majority Leader Jim Merrill introduces a bill that would ban the budget-busting practice of taxpayer-funded lobbying in South Carolina … and every year big government backers in the Republican Party team up with the Democrats to make sure Merrill’s bill goes absolutely nowhere.
It’s an annual exercise in futility, as powerful government interests use your money to retain ethically-challenged lobbyists to help them perpetuate their own growth.
According to a report from the S.C. Policy Council, the problem of taxpayer-funded lobbying is only getting worse in South Carolina, jumping from $2.5 million in 2005 to $3 million in 2006, the most recent year for which numbers are available.
Sure, that’s chump change in a $7 billion budget - until you realize that money went directly to feeding the growth of that budget, and that lobbyists only have to bill for the time they actually spend working directly with lawmakers.
From the Policy Council report:
Government is growing faster than our incomes, and a wide range of positive reform has been squashed behind the scenes. There is a common reason for both of those two movements – the power of taxpayer-financed lobbyists. Lobbyists for state agencies and local governments are paid for with taxpayers’ dollars to petition lawmakers for even more public spending – their job is to take the budget process to the back halls of the Statehouse and away from the open floor of the legislature.
Instead of spending public dollars on core functions of government, South Carolina counties, cities and school districts are paying high-powered lobbyists to fight for more public money and thwart accountability and transparency. In 2006, taxpayers spent almost $3 million on publicly financed lobbyists – that was a 15 percent increase from the $2.5 million spent in 2005.
Taxpayer funded lobbyists present a conflict of interest and waste taxpayer money. The Legislature’s annual budget process gives state agencies and local governments many opportunities to explain and justify their budgetary needs, and to make the case for important projects. University presidents, state agency heads and other public entities should have many qualified employees to answer legislators’ questions and present information to the General Assembly. The public should never finance lobbying, especially when they pay to fight for an agenda they often do not support.
That’s the main beef we have with taxpayer-funded lobbying … specifically, why should an individual South Carolinian have to pay for the legislative advocacy of an issue they don’t agree with?
We waste enough money in this state as it is … why should we pay people whose very existence revolves around getting us to waste even more?
Not surprisingly, that’s popular logic in a Republican state like South Carolina.
It’s also why several big government Republicans put a ban on taxpayer-funded lobbying at the top of their 2008 reelection platform - despite the fact that none of them lifted a finger to help pass Merrill’s bill.
For his part, Merrill is stepping down as Majority Leader this year - meaning he’ll be free from his cat-herding responsibilities and will have more time to push meaningful conservative legislation.
Let’s hope a long-overdue ban on the shameful practice of taxpayer-funded lobbying remains at the top of his list …



Comments
By Stroker Ace on July 19th, 2008 at 7:39 pm
while I agree that publicly funded contract lobbying may be questionable, but there are those that are employees of certain agencies that really do more than lobby and they I don’t feel should be penalized for do a part of their job.
By jed on July 20th, 2008 at 12:42 am
don’t forget about the “public” entities like the SPA and the utilities that not only lobby but spend oodles on glitzy ad campaigns and marketing to convince the public (that owns them) to support things that aren’t necessarily in their own best interest. other agencies do media/advertising, but it’s generally public service type stuff (highways or dieways, etc.).
By Philip Branton on July 20th, 2008 at 4:10 pm
Sic..where did you get the photo? Looks more like a “Lovers Quarrel”??
The setting should have been a “Barbeque and Ballots” gala. (Better known as “Barbie-Q and Bribes”) Maybe have Bill “Raunchy” Rauch on the phone with a WallStreet Journ in hand with a female “Sales Rep” pointing at the paper and whispering in his EAR. A caption saying “BUY..Big Boy..Buy! Or maybe a tricked out ESCALADE with “GMF” on the plates for James “Grand Master Flash” Clyburn and in the background have a banner welcoming Jim to some fundraiser??
I wonder if Mrs. Cobb is knowledgeable about this???
By Philip Branton on July 20th, 2008 at 4:13 pm
Sic….
Who owns Buck Ridge Plantation in Orangeburg?
By Rid the state agencies of parasites on July 20th, 2008 at 6:42 pm
Well I have to wonder if Rep. Merrill is doing enough to stop this parasite sucking practice?
Why dont the lawmakers just cut these agencies budgets 30% per year and not fund the projects they are lobbying spending Pr dollars on until they quit hiring lobbyists and unnecessary PR firms.
By Stroker Ace on July 20th, 2008 at 9:24 pm
the photo is from “Thank You for Smoking”…..a classic movie