Democrats Battle For “Republican” Candidates

HYPOCRISY, ETHICS VIOLATIONS & GUBERNATORIAL POSTURING HIGHLIGHT DEMS’ SCHIZOPHRENIC CAMPAIGNING

FITSNews – June 23, 2008 – Two Democratic heavyweights are duking it out on behalf of left-leaning Republican candidates, using illegal campaign tactics to lure Democratic voters into participating in two GOP runoff elections scheduled for tomorrow.

And while the two Democrats – current State Superintendent Jim Rex and his predecessor Inez Tenenbaum – are on the same team this time around, the whole exercise appears to be a continuation of their ongoing battle for frontrunner status in the 2010 Democratic gubernatorial primary.

We’ve already written about Rex’s endorsement of incumbent Sen. Jake Knotts, but FITSNews has learned today that Tenenbaum’s organization – “Rise SC” – is running television advertisements on behalf of Sen. Knotts as well as S.C. Rep. Scott Talley, who is also involved in a close GOP State Senate runoff election. The ads were purchased, incidentally, by longtime Democratic consultant Bud Ferillo.

Of course, the fact that South Carolina’s two most well-known Democratic politicians are actively campaigning on behalf of these “Republicans” isn’t the whole story, as both Rex and Tenenbaum could face ethics investigations for violating state law as a result of their activities …

FITSNews has received reports that mailings sent by “Rise SC” – and campaign e-mails sent by Superintendent Rex – explicitly urge voters to cast their ballots for specific candidates, all of whom ostensibly “support public education” in South Carolina.

The “Rise SC” mailings even include boxes with a “check” mark by the candidates’ names, which (in addition to the explicit voting language) is in clear violation of federal campaign law as articulated in FEC v. Wisconsin Right To Life.

This “express advocacy” – i.e. directly urging recipients to cast their ballots for or against a candidate – would make “Rise SC” subject to regulation by the State Ethics Commission, and force it to comply with registration and disclosure requirements.

Similarly, Superintendent Rex has been using his campaign organization to send out e-mails instructing voters to cast their ballots for Knotts, Talley and other candidates, which is also in violation of state ethics law.

Ironically, Rex and Tenenbaum have been among the most vocal critics of legal third party advocacy ads, which adhere to state and federal law for permitted (and protected) political speech by focusing on specific issues and refraining from instructing recipients to “vote for” or “vote against” specific candidates.

Legal third party advocacy ads – such as those run by groups like South Carolinians for Responsible Government – have been repeatedly assailed by South Carolina’s mainstream media establishment. Local leaders of those groups have been referred to as “cancers,” and legislation targeting their Constitutionally-protected speech has been introduced in the S.C. General Assembly.

Sadly, it appears that attempting to criminalize legal campaign activity wasn’t enough for Rex and Tenenbaum, as both have now resorted to overtly illegal campaign activity on behalf of candidates they believe will tow their “pro-public education” line.

And yet the mainstream media establishment remains curiously silent about this hypocrisy … just as it did when public school officials were busted earlier this month using state resources to campaign for certain candidates, which is also against the law.

To add another ironic twist, Tenenbaum and Rex have overseen South Carolina’s utterly miserable public schools for the past decade, benefiting from astronomical spending increases and yet still producing the same deplorable results on behalf of our school children.

So … in addition to getting absolutely nothing done for our kids, South Carolina’s top two educrats are now resorting to far worse tactics than those employed by the people they have spent the last four years villifying.

All in Republican primaries, no less.

Interestingly enough, though, Rex and Tenenbaum’s campaign activities have little to do with Knotts, Talley and the other candidates they are backing.

As if the recent Democratic superdelegate scandal didn’t make it plain enough, these two are competing for pole position in the 2010 gubernatorial race.

Accordingly, the establishment of networks, databases and communications capabilities in advance of that potentially grueling fight serves to enhance their battle readiness for the upcoming struggle.

Given Tenenbaum’s recent U.S. Senate loss, Rex probably has the heads-up at this point, although the prospect of a local version of “Obama-Hillary” has Democratic activists looking for any advantage they can find to improve their favored candidates positioning.

Of course, after what we’ve uncovered, both Rex and Tenenbaum may end up with ethics violations on their record.

And should Knotts and Talley go down in defeat, they’ll probably also both end up with some egg on their faces.

Follow FITSNews on Twitter and like us on Facebook

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

  1. By Lucky Strike June 23, 2008 at 1:22 pm

    Funny thing is in Aiken that the same people are working to support Scott Singer, a RINO of the worst kind. He’s admitted to having voted for Dukakis and Clinton twice and ran as an independent for the House against the Republican nominee several years ago. Singer has also supported for numerous tax increases while on Aiken County Council and has an anti-business voting record. He’s running against Tom Young, as Republican as you can get, except he spurned SCRG’s money and support so they had to support someone, but they should have just stayed out of it. Young is going to win and SCRG will chalk up another loss. Let’s just hope that Young is more of a supporter of reform of government than the guy he is about to replace in House 81. You should see some of the Democrats, those in and out of the closet, supporting RINO Singer. How does that go about politics and strange bedfellows?

    Reply

  2. By jed bartlet June 23, 2008 at 1:22 pm

    Just a question: would they really be violating federal election laws since the elections are state elections and not federal? I can understand their being against state law, if that is the case…

    Reply

  3. By Hmm June 23, 2008 at 2:33 pm

    Singer a RINO?

    Didn’t Tom Young support Tommy Moore against Mark Sanford?

    And didn’t Tommy Moore’s son write a letter defending Tom Young…

    Hmm…sounds like the folks at TTS are spoking the pipe again, the same one that made them think Bob Staton was a conservative and Karen Floyd was a RINO…

    Yeah…Tom Young, Scott Talley – the latest RINOs from the folks who brought us Bob Status Quo Staton and Mitt the Flip Flopper Romney…

    Reply

  4. By Calhoun Fawls June 23, 2008 at 10:39 pm

    You know, when false conservatives from out of state pour in money to buy South Carolina’s government, it does not really bother me if Tennenbaum and Rex voice their opinion. After all, they are from SC. I don’t see the difference between some fed in Washington or a group of financial fat cats telling SC what it ought to do with its local affairs. There are no real conservatives left out there. Just people who want to grow government and spend it for their means, i.e. helping rich folks go to private schools and giving educrats more money. That is the choice. They all want your money, just for their purposes, and they pay people well to blog about it and send out mail. Businessmen expect a return on their investment. What will it be?

    Reply

  5. By rick June 24, 2008 at 7:27 am

    Ever notice that it’s always out of state money? So, does this mean South Carolina is for sale? How much? If out of state money is always the curse, and instate money is the cure, why do we have one of the most corrupt inept of governments manned by the native sons? Seems rolling in out of state money and people can’t bring any more damage than that being done by the native sons? Just asking?

    Reply

  6. By Clay Pit Crew June 27, 2008 at 8:27 pm

    Tom Young is a life-long Republican. He has solid GOP credentials. He will represent us — the Aiken natives — not the northern liberal imports who despoil the name Republican.

    Scott Singer, on the other hand, is known as the Junior RINO Ranger in Aiken politics. He’s given money to more Democrats that most people can name. He’s proudly voted for Bill Clinton twice (it’s in the Aiken Standard archives). He’s voted for every tax increase and BIG Government growth scheme that’s come along on Aiken County Council. The only thing Republican about Singer is that he runs on the GOP ticket because a Democrat can’t win in the Gated Community of Woodside Plantation. He brags that he was fired by the bank because he opposed the TIF in Aiken County, when the real reason is he forgot he had a job other than promoting Scott Singer.

    We’re not a mouthpiece of TTS. We’re just plain ol’ Aiken County folks.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

*