Bobtailing’s Back

SOUTH CAROLINA LAWMAKERS HAVEN’T LEARNED THEIR LESSON

FITSNews – June 9, 2008 – Senate President Glenn McConnell doesn’t like what’s happened to his own bill promoting tax breaks on the purchase of energy efficient appliances … in fact, he took to the floor of the Senate earlier this session to declare it “unconstitutional.”

What happened? Well, McConnell’s bill got “bobtailed,” a term used to describe the process of unrelated (and typically special interest-driven) additions getting tacked onto bills at the last minute in an effort to improve their likelihood of passage.

There’s just one problem with “bobtailing” – it’s in clear violation of state law, which requires that proposed bills address “one subject.”  The S.C. Supreme Court specifically ruled multi-subject legislation unconstitutional in a high-profile 2005 case involving government watchdog Ned Sloan.  Unhappy with such flagrant disregard for the rule of law, Sloan sued over a bill known as the Life Sciences Act, which much like McConnell’s energy efficiency bill had morphed from a well-intended piece of one-subject legislation into a special interest “Christmas tree.”

For his part, Gov. Mark Sanford has been unequivocal in his stance against “bobtailing,” repeatedly vetoing bills that seek to take this unlawful end-around our State Constitution. Yet while Sanford and McConnell have both stood strong on this issue, sadly most state lawmakers haven’t learned their lesson …

Follow FITSNews on Twitter and like us on Facebook

Tags: , ,

Comments

  1. By Darrell Wallace June 9, 2008 at 4:42 pm

    Time to teach the Legislators their lesson in Constitutionality. They swore to uphold it now they want to break it. Shame on you, you sneaky men & women with your pet projects. Crooked is as crooked does. Kudos to Glenn and the Governor for catching the sneak thieves with their hand in the cookie jar.

    Reply

  2. By west_rhino June 9, 2008 at 5:53 pm

    And we have a problem with a line item veto… I wonder why.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

*