<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hollywood Strike Redux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/06/05/hollywood-strike-redux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/06/05/hollywood-strike-redux/</link>
	<description>Unfair ... Imbalanced</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:38:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob W.</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/06/05/hollywood-strike-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-25633</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=3856#comment-25633</guid>
		<description>Workers&#039; strikes aren&#039;t usually state-sanctioned extortion; instead, they&#039;re a great example of the free market in action (or at least they should be).  A business has a need for my services, at a price I don&#039;t like.  I can refuse to work at that price.  I can even convince my coworkers that they don&#039;t like the price.  The business can then increase their price or decide not to hire us.  No big deal, and not extortion; just people engaging in consensual business relationships.

Perhaps the problem comes when the government gets involved.  I think we would agree that the government shouldn&#039;t be at all involved in strikes and unions, either to regulate or aid them.  Unions are just a group of people that all work at the same place, and should be subject to the same laws (anti-trust, etc.) as everyone else- but not subject to any special laws.  Some unions might have turned into giant political action committees, but if they&#039;re following the law, we&#039;re better off leaving them alone (or joining them if we see fit).

Unions can improve working conditions and pay, and as a free-market proponent yourself, they&#039;re the best way to do these things without government intervention.  Show them some capitalistic love.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Workers&#8217; strikes aren&#8217;t usually state-sanctioned extortion; instead, they&#8217;re a great example of the free market in action (or at least they should be).  A business has a need for my services, at a price I don&#8217;t like.  I can refuse to work at that price.  I can even convince my coworkers that they don&#8217;t like the price.  The business can then increase their price or decide not to hire us.  No big deal, and not extortion; just people engaging in consensual business relationships.</p>
<p>Perhaps the problem comes when the government gets involved.  I think we would agree that the government shouldn&#8217;t be at all involved in strikes and unions, either to regulate or aid them.  Unions are just a group of people that all work at the same place, and should be subject to the same laws (anti-trust, etc.) as everyone else- but not subject to any special laws.  Some unions might have turned into giant political action committees, but if they&#8217;re following the law, we&#8217;re better off leaving them alone (or joining them if we see fit).</p>
<p>Unions can improve working conditions and pay, and as a free-market proponent yourself, they&#8217;re the best way to do these things without government intervention.  Show them some capitalistic love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
