…

UPDATE:

I changed my mind.

Obama IS NOT naive.

McCain is not naive AND he is a seasoned cheater.

And a fruitcake.

:)

Dallas Morning News Thread Update:

Posted by Ed Cognoski @ 4:39 PM Thu, Jun 05, 2008

Two words: Voodoo economics.
report as objectionable

Posted by VivaLaHillary @ 5:35 PM Thu, Jun 05, 2008

Three Facts:

Obama is naive.

McCain is not.

McCain will cheat his way to the White House.

AND I HOPE SHE DOESN”T TOAST OBAMA BECAUSE HE WILL TAKE US TO HELL IN A HAND BASKET PEOPLE!!!

From Dallas Morning News:

Hillary Clinton: I don’t want to be Obama’s VP
2:46 PM Thu, Jun 05, 2008 | Permalink | Yahoo! Buzz
Michael Landauer E-mail News tips

Democratic presidential hopeful New York Senator Hillary Clinton speaks at her election night event on the day of the Montana and South Dakota Democratic presidential primary, at Baruch College in New York, NY on June 3, 2008. Clinton said she had made no decision yet on the future of her candidacy for president after her rival Barack Obama clinched the Democratic party nomination. AFP PHOTO / ROBYN BECK (Photo credit should read ROBYN BECK/AFP/Getty Images) OK, she didn’t really say that. Not in those words. But these are her words, and I think they speak for themselves on the issue of whether she could serve a President Obama. In fact, from reviewing what she says about Obama, I’m not sure how she can justify not voting for McCain.

Are these the words of a future Obama VP?

On health care:
“We’ve got to put up a candidate who’s willing to stand up for it and fight for it … He has called his plan universal, then he has called it `virtually universal,’ but it simply does not deserve that label,”

You know, if you look at the recent article about Senator Obama’s work on health care reform in the Illinois legislature, it’s a very interesting piece about how he basically did the bidding of the insurance companies during that effort.

On foreign experience:
“Voters will have to judge if living in a foreign country at the age of 10 prepares one to face the big, complex international challenges the next president will face. I think we need a president with more experience than that, someone the rest of the world knows, looks up to and has confidence in.”

On foreign policy:

Senator Obama, meanwhile, represents another choice. He wavers from seeming to believe that mediation and meetings without preconditions can solve the world?s most intractable problems. To advocating rash unilateral military action without cooperation from our allies in the most sensitive region of the world.

On the economy:
“There is one job we can’t afford on-the-job training for – our next president. That could be the costliest job training in history. Every day spent learning the ropes is another day of rising costs, mounting deficits and growing anxiety for our families. And they cannot afford to keep waiting.”

I was fighting against those (Republican) ideas when you were practicing law and representing your contributor, Rezko, in his slum landlord business in inner-city Chicago. (Cheers, applause.)

On, well, everything:
I understand Senator Obama is talking about energy today, right here in Pennsylvania. And that?s great. But talking about problems is easy. Solving problems is hard. And speeches are no substitute for solutions. Speeches won?t lower gas prices, stop climate change, or lessen our dependence on oil from Saudi Arabia.

The true test comes when it?s time to match rhetoric with results. And unfortunately, we?ve seen that Senator Obama?s promises and speeches are often just words.

On the campaign trail, Senator Obama talks about clean energy. But in the Senate, he voted for Dick Cheney?s energy bill loaded with new tax breaks for oil companies. When he faced a tough choice, his support for a clean energy future turned out to be just words.

It?s like how he talks about fixing NAFTA. But his top economic adviser assured the Canadian government that he wouldn?t really follow through. His position? Just words.

Senator Obama promises to withdraw from Iraq within 16 months. But his top foreign policy adviser said he’s not really going to rely on that plan. I guess that plan is just words, too.

We need a president who will solve problems. Who will fight for our families long after the speeches are over and the cameras are gone. That?s the choice in this campaign: Solutions you can rely on – versus words you can?t.

Comments

Posted by Zachary Hilbun @ 3:52 PM Thu, Jun 05, 2008

Maybe she wants to be McCain’s VP
report as objectionable

Posted by ~~~VivaLaHillary~~~ @ 4:00 PM Thu, Jun 05, 2008

Blaze a trail! There is a groundswell of female support from those of us who WILL NOT vote for Obama or McCain. We have witnessed the naivete of Obama and the rigging tactics of McCain. We have been where you are — brushed aside as irrelevant. We’re counting on you and have faith in you!

But Jake doesn’t need him. Jake has his own dog handler.

BIN News Editorial Staff – Never Stalked – never will.